A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Handwriting and Spelling in Children with Specific Learning Disabilities

L. Bray, Camille Skubik-Peplaski, Kera B. Ackerman
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Handwriting and Spelling in Children with Specific Learning Disabilities","authors":"L. Bray, Camille Skubik-Peplaski, Kera B. Ackerman","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2021.1934227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Handwriting and spelling deficits are common struggles experienced by children with specific learning disabilities (SLD), but there is little evidence on interventions that target these areas for children with SLD. To systematically review the research investigating the effectiveness of handwriting and spelling interventions for children with SLD. A systematic review was conducted that included studies focusing on handwriting and/or spelling interventions for children with SLD. A Black and Downs checklist was completed for each included article to evaluate validity and reliability. Effect sizes were calculated of results for a unitless comparison. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria: six examined handwriting exclusively, three spelling, and two combined spelling and handwriting. The interventions were grouped into categories of tablet-based, sensorimotor, and/or self-management interventions. Themes of occupation-as-ends versus occupation-as-means were also noted. Those interventions that promoted self-management and used occupation-as-means were found to be most effective. Utilizing the handwriting and spelling within treatment as well as encouraging a child’s autonomy and participation are valuable strategies for occupational therapist to use in improving literacy outcomes for children with SLD.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"34 1","pages":"437 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1934227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Handwriting and spelling deficits are common struggles experienced by children with specific learning disabilities (SLD), but there is little evidence on interventions that target these areas for children with SLD. To systematically review the research investigating the effectiveness of handwriting and spelling interventions for children with SLD. A systematic review was conducted that included studies focusing on handwriting and/or spelling interventions for children with SLD. A Black and Downs checklist was completed for each included article to evaluate validity and reliability. Effect sizes were calculated of results for a unitless comparison. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria: six examined handwriting exclusively, three spelling, and two combined spelling and handwriting. The interventions were grouped into categories of tablet-based, sensorimotor, and/or self-management interventions. Themes of occupation-as-ends versus occupation-as-means were also noted. Those interventions that promoted self-management and used occupation-as-means were found to be most effective. Utilizing the handwriting and spelling within treatment as well as encouraging a child’s autonomy and participation are valuable strategies for occupational therapist to use in improving literacy outcomes for children with SLD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高特殊学习障碍儿童书写和拼写能力干预措施有效性的系统评价
书写和拼写缺陷是患有特殊学习障碍(SLD)的儿童所经历的共同斗争,但针对这些领域的干预措施的证据很少。目的:系统回顾对特殊语言障碍儿童书写和拼写干预效果的研究。我们进行了一项系统的综述,包括对特殊语言障碍儿童手写和/或拼写干预的研究。对每篇纳入的文章完成了一份黑与Downs检查表,以评估有效性和可靠性。计算无单位比较结果的效应量。11项研究符合纳入标准:6项研究只检查笔迹,3项检查拼写,2项检查拼写和笔迹。这些干预措施被分为基于片剂、感觉运动和/或自我管理的干预措施。还注意到以职业为目的和以职业为手段的主题。那些促进自我管理和利用职业作为手段的干预措施被认为是最有效的。在治疗中使用手写和拼写以及鼓励儿童的自主性和参与是职业治疗师用于改善特殊语言障碍儿童识字结果的有价值的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let down by Low Expectations: A Qualitative Interview/participatory Photography Study of Feeding Problems in Autistic Children Executive Functioning in the Schools: Perspectives from Occupational Therapists Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: How to, how much, and how often? A scoping review A Pilot Study on Efficacy of a Play-Based Social Skills Training Group for First-Grade Elementary Children with Autism in Taiwan How can we evaluate collaborative practices in inclusive schools? Challenges and proposed solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1