Algorithmic Trading vs. Bid-Offer Spreads, Volatility, and the Distribution of Profits and Losses: A Simulation

Arne Breuer, Hans-Peter Burghof
{"title":"Algorithmic Trading vs. Bid-Offer Spreads, Volatility, and the Distribution of Profits and Losses: A Simulation","authors":"Arne Breuer, Hans-Peter Burghof","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2200075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic trading leads to contradictory conclusions of market participants and observers: While the former blame it to break the market, the latter find it makes it better. To explain these contradictory views, we create a few-type market simulation in a discrete-time, one-asset world. We analyse both the observable factors average bid-offer spread and volatility as well as the unobservable distribution of profits and losses of the market participants. We conclude that regarding HFT, market observers and market participants talk at cross-purposes.","PeriodicalId":11800,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2200075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Algorithmic trading leads to contradictory conclusions of market participants and observers: While the former blame it to break the market, the latter find it makes it better. To explain these contradictory views, we create a few-type market simulation in a discrete-time, one-asset world. We analyse both the observable factors average bid-offer spread and volatility as well as the unobservable distribution of profits and losses of the market participants. We conclude that regarding HFT, market observers and market participants talk at cross-purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
算法交易与买卖价差,波动性和利润和损失的分配:模拟
算法交易让市场参与者和观察人士得出了相互矛盾的结论:前者指责算法交易破坏了市场,后者认为算法交易让市场变得更好。为了解释这些相互矛盾的观点,我们在一个离散时间、单一资产的世界中创建了几种类型的市场模拟。我们既分析了可观察因素平均买卖价差和波动率,也分析了市场参与者不可观察的盈亏分布。我们的结论是,关于高频交易,市场观察者和市场参与者的谈话是相互矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Risk-Return Tradeoff Among Equity Factors Predictive Regressions under Arbitrary Persistence and Stock Return Predictability News and Trading After Hours High-Frequency Arbitrage and Market Illiquidity President’s Confidence and the Stock Market Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1