Benefit-cost analysis of iron fortification of rice in India: modelling potential economic gains from improving haemoglobin and averting anaemia

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Effectiveness Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19439342.2023.2168728
L. Qureshy, H. Alderman, Navneet Manchanda
{"title":"Benefit-cost analysis of iron fortification of rice in India: modelling potential economic gains from improving haemoglobin and averting anaemia","authors":"L. Qureshy, H. Alderman, Navneet Manchanda","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2023.2168728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents an ex-ante Benefit-Cost analysis of proposed fortification of extruder rice with iron under the social safety net in India. The benefits of iron fortification are estimated in terms of economic gains from increases in current work productivity among adults and future productivity from improvements in learning among school-going children. The base case scenario indicates a benefit cost ratio of 8.2, with 69 percent coming from improved learning in school and the remainder through enhanced work productivity. Benefit-cost ratios are also presented for a range of alternative assumptions, all of these resulting in ratios greater than 1. Nevertheless, despite decades of fortification at scale, a principal conclusion of this study is that future benefit cost models would gain confidence if more evidence is generated on the relationship of improved biomarkers for iron and changes in measures of cognition and labour productivity.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"199 1","pages":"91 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2023.2168728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents an ex-ante Benefit-Cost analysis of proposed fortification of extruder rice with iron under the social safety net in India. The benefits of iron fortification are estimated in terms of economic gains from increases in current work productivity among adults and future productivity from improvements in learning among school-going children. The base case scenario indicates a benefit cost ratio of 8.2, with 69 percent coming from improved learning in school and the remainder through enhanced work productivity. Benefit-cost ratios are also presented for a range of alternative assumptions, all of these resulting in ratios greater than 1. Nevertheless, despite decades of fortification at scale, a principal conclusion of this study is that future benefit cost models would gain confidence if more evidence is generated on the relationship of improved biomarkers for iron and changes in measures of cognition and labour productivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度大米铁强化的效益-成本分析:模拟改善血红蛋白和避免贫血的潜在经济收益
摘要:本文提出了一项事前效益-成本分析,建议在印度社会安全网下用铁强化挤出大米。铁强化的好处是根据成年人当前工作生产力的提高所带来的经济收益和学龄儿童学习能力的改善所带来的未来生产力来估计的。基本情景表明,收益成本比为8.2,其中69%来自改善学校学习,其余来自提高工作效率。效益成本比也提出了一系列可供选择的假设,所有这些导致比率大于1。然而,尽管数十年的大规模强化,本研究的一个主要结论是,如果有更多的证据表明铁的生物标志物的改善与认知和劳动生产率测量的变化之间的关系,未来的效益成本模型将获得信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the small business programme benefit self-employed workers? Evidence from Nicaragua Grow the pie, or have it? Using machine learning to impact heterogeneity in the Ultra-poor graduation model How do patent subsidies drive SMEs to patent? Evidence from China Impact of cash transfer on food accessibility and calorie-intake in Pakistan Self-selection versus population-based sampling for evaluation of an agronomy training program in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1