Cardiac catheterization laboratory activation by social media reduces reperfusion time of patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in community hospital

Guozhong Wang
{"title":"Cardiac catheterization laboratory activation by social media reduces reperfusion time of patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in community hospital","authors":"Guozhong Wang","doi":"10.4103/ed.ed_7_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation by WeChat in community hospitals transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bypassing emergency department (ED) on time delay in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study of STEMI patients who were transferred from community hospitals to Luhe Hospital for primary PCI. Patients were divided into two groups: in CCL group, electrocardiogram (ECG) was transmitted through WeChat in the community hospital and the patients were transferred directly to CCL by emergency medical services (EMS) (n = 43); in control group, patients without ECG transmission were transferred by EMS to ED before CCL arrival (n = 57). The primary endpoint was median first medical contact (FMC)-to-device (FMC2D) times. The secondary endpoint was door-to-device (D2D) times. Results: The baseline clinical data and angiographic features among the two groups were similar (all P > 0.05. There was no difference in the symptom onset-to-FMC time (median interquartile range [IQR] min, 100.00 [74.50–247.00] vs. 105.00 [70.00–180.00], P > 0.05) between the two groups. Compared to control group, CCL group had shortened FMC2D times (median IQR min, 95.00 [72.60–160.58] vs. 160.79 [124.72–205.50], P < 0.001) and shortened D2D time (median IQR min, 17.18 [13.77–21.15] vs. 49.27 [40.26–64.90], P < 0.001). Achievement of the FMC2D time goal of <120 min rose from 29.82% in the control group to 76.74% in the CCL group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CCL activated by WeChat can reduce reperfusion time of STEMI patients who are transferred for PCI from community hospitals.","PeriodicalId":11702,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Disease","volume":"29 1","pages":"52 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ed.ed_7_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation by WeChat in community hospitals transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bypassing emergency department (ED) on time delay in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study of STEMI patients who were transferred from community hospitals to Luhe Hospital for primary PCI. Patients were divided into two groups: in CCL group, electrocardiogram (ECG) was transmitted through WeChat in the community hospital and the patients were transferred directly to CCL by emergency medical services (EMS) (n = 43); in control group, patients without ECG transmission were transferred by EMS to ED before CCL arrival (n = 57). The primary endpoint was median first medical contact (FMC)-to-device (FMC2D) times. The secondary endpoint was door-to-device (D2D) times. Results: The baseline clinical data and angiographic features among the two groups were similar (all P > 0.05. There was no difference in the symptom onset-to-FMC time (median interquartile range [IQR] min, 100.00 [74.50–247.00] vs. 105.00 [70.00–180.00], P > 0.05) between the two groups. Compared to control group, CCL group had shortened FMC2D times (median IQR min, 95.00 [72.60–160.58] vs. 160.79 [124.72–205.50], P < 0.001) and shortened D2D time (median IQR min, 17.18 [13.77–21.15] vs. 49.27 [40.26–64.90], P < 0.001). Achievement of the FMC2D time goal of <120 min rose from 29.82% in the control group to 76.74% in the CCL group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CCL activated by WeChat can reduce reperfusion time of STEMI patients who are transferred for PCI from community hospitals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社交媒体激活心导管实验室可减少转到社区医院进行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者再灌注时间
目的:本研究旨在评价社区医院转经急诊部(ED)行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时,微信激活心导管实验室(CCL)对st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者延迟的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性的队列研究,研究对象是从社区医院转到陆河医院进行初级PCI治疗的STEMI患者。将患者分为两组:CCL组在社区医院通过微信传送心电图,由急救医疗服务(EMS)直接转至CCL (n = 43);对照组无心电图传递患者在CCL到达前经EMS转至ED (n = 57)。主要终点是首次医疗接触(FMC)到设备(FMC2D)时间的中位数。次要终点是门到设备(D2D)时间。结果:两组患者的基线临床资料和血管造影特征相似(P < 0.05)。两组患者症状发作至fmc时间(中位数四分位数范围[IQR] min, 100.00 [74.50-247.00] vs. 105.00 [70.00-180.00], P < 0.05)无差异。与对照组相比,CCL组FMC2D时间缩短(IQR min中位数,95.00[72.60-160.58]比160.79 [124.72-205.50],P < 0.001), D2D时间缩短(IQR min中位数,17.18[13.77-21.15]比49.27 [40.26-64.90],P < 0.001)。FMC2D时间目标<120 min的达成率从对照组的29.82%上升到CCL组的76.74% (P < 0.001)。结论:微信激活CCL可缩短社区医院转PCI STEMI患者再灌注时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Activities-specific balance confidence scale in elderly in community nursing home Evaluation of formaldehyde emissions by school supplies using a low-cost passive sampler and spectrophotometric determination Human immunodeficiency virus self-testing in India: Time to move from evidence to implementation Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A marker for potential short-term neurological deterioration in acute large vessel occlusion patients postmechanical thrombectomy Sustaining and augmenting the pace of ongoing prevention and control activities to attain the goal of leprosy-free world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1