Analisis Didaktis untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Calon Guru Fisika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Gaya Belajar

A. Busyairi, Ahmad Harjono, Muhammad Zuhdi
{"title":"Analisis Didaktis untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Calon Guru Fisika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Gaya Belajar","authors":"A. Busyairi, Ahmad Harjono, Muhammad Zuhdi","doi":"10.29408/kpj.v5i2.4455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the learning outcomes of prospective physics teachers in terms of cognitive and learning styles. The sample consisted of 47 prospective physics teachers at the University of Mataram. The instruments used consisted of the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), the VAK learning style questionnaire, and the learning outcomes test instrument. The research data were then categorized and analyzed using descriptive statistics to see a picture of student learning outcomes in terms of their learning styles and cognitive styles. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a field independence (FI) cognitive style and students who have a field dependence (FD) cognitive style. Students who have FI cognitive style tend to get better scores when compared to FD. When viewed from the learning style, it can be seen that the number of students who have visual learning styles is 46.80%, audio is 8.51%, and kinesthetic is 44.68%. Students who have a kinesthetic learning style tend to get better scores when compared to students who have a visual and audio learning style. By paying attention to the characteristics and percentage of students who have FI and FD cognitive styles and students who have visual, audio, and kinesthetic learning styles, one alternative learning that can be used to improve student learning outcomes is cooperative or experimental-based collaborative learning model.","PeriodicalId":82301,"journal":{"name":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v5i2.4455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the learning outcomes of prospective physics teachers in terms of cognitive and learning styles. The sample consisted of 47 prospective physics teachers at the University of Mataram. The instruments used consisted of the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), the VAK learning style questionnaire, and the learning outcomes test instrument. The research data were then categorized and analyzed using descriptive statistics to see a picture of student learning outcomes in terms of their learning styles and cognitive styles. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be seen that there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a field independence (FI) cognitive style and students who have a field dependence (FD) cognitive style. Students who have FI cognitive style tend to get better scores when compared to FD. When viewed from the learning style, it can be seen that the number of students who have visual learning styles is 46.80%, audio is 8.51%, and kinesthetic is 44.68%. Students who have a kinesthetic learning style tend to get better scores when compared to students who have a visual and audio learning style. By paying attention to the characteristics and percentage of students who have FI and FD cognitive styles and students who have visual, audio, and kinesthetic learning styles, one alternative learning that can be used to improve student learning outcomes is cooperative or experimental-based collaborative learning model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零度分析从认知和学习风格来提高未来物理教师的学习成绩
本研究旨在分析准物理教师在认知和学习风格方面的学习成果。样本包括47名未来的马塔兰大学物理教师。使用的工具包括小组嵌入图形测试(GEFT)、VAK学习风格问卷和学习成果测试工具。然后,研究数据被分类并使用描述性统计分析,以了解学生在学习风格和认知风格方面的学习成果。从数据分析的结果可以看出,场独立(FI)认知风格的学生和场依赖(FD)认知风格的学生在学习成果上存在差异。具有FI认知风格的学生比具有FD认知风格的学生得分更高。从学习风格来看,视觉学习风格的学生占46.80%,音频学习风格的占8.51%,动觉学习风格的占44.68%。采用动觉学习方式的学生比采用视听学习方式的学生得分更高。通过关注具有FI和FD认知风格的学生以及具有视觉、音频和动觉学习风格的学生的特征和百分比,可以用来提高学生学习成果的另一种学习方法是合作或基于实验的协作学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performance Assessment in STEM-EDP Project for High School Students: Validity Aspect Analisis Perbandingan Nilai Efektivitas Koefisien Absorbsi pada Pelepah Pisang dan Eceng Gondok Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Pengembangan Model Perkuliahan PAKDE (Presentasi, Audiensi, Konfirmasi, Diskusi Dan Evaluasi) berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Pengembangan Alat Peraga Fisika Sederhana Berbahan Bekas Pakai pada Materi Gerak Lurus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1