The use of functionality scales in patients with Post-Polio Syndrome

Aline Simão Helou, A. Ramos, A. Oliveira, A. Quadros, F. Fávero
{"title":"The use of functionality scales in patients with Post-Polio Syndrome","authors":"Aline Simão Helou, A. Ramos, A. Oliveira, A. Quadros, F. Fávero","doi":"10.21472/bjbs.061305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Post-Polio Syndrome (PPS) is a neurological disease, resulting in the decrease of the neuromuscular functions being characterized by a set of clinical manifestations that occur in individuals who had acute paralytic poliomyelitis. The patients with PPS begin to present new limitations on the performance of their ADLs and, at the same time, tend to ignore them, continuing their daily work with greater physical effort. The need for a functional evaluation is therefore necessary to find out where the commitments are in the ADLs and to help them without aggravating the degenerative PPS. To identify the main functional assessment scales used in individuals with PPS. A study review of the literature was performed on the functional scales used in patients with PPS described in the articles in the database. We found 12 functional scales in activities of daily living, as follows: Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), International Classification of Impairments, Disability's and Handicaps (ICIDH), Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), Sunnas ADL Index, Katz Index, Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), ADLs-Staircase, Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Older Adult Resource Survey (OARS), and Self-Reporter ADL. None of the 12 scales mentioned in our study is validated for the use in patients with PPS, the most scales found in the literatures reviewed in this research were NHP and ICIDH. Therefore, we found 9 scales validated in Brazil, Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), International Classification of Impairments, Disability's and Handicaps (ICIDH), Older Adult Resource Survey (OARS), Katz Index and Self-Reporter ADL.\n","PeriodicalId":9319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21472/bjbs.061305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-Polio Syndrome (PPS) is a neurological disease, resulting in the decrease of the neuromuscular functions being characterized by a set of clinical manifestations that occur in individuals who had acute paralytic poliomyelitis. The patients with PPS begin to present new limitations on the performance of their ADLs and, at the same time, tend to ignore them, continuing their daily work with greater physical effort. The need for a functional evaluation is therefore necessary to find out where the commitments are in the ADLs and to help them without aggravating the degenerative PPS. To identify the main functional assessment scales used in individuals with PPS. A study review of the literature was performed on the functional scales used in patients with PPS described in the articles in the database. We found 12 functional scales in activities of daily living, as follows: Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), International Classification of Impairments, Disability's and Handicaps (ICIDH), Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), Sunnas ADL Index, Katz Index, Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), ADLs-Staircase, Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Older Adult Resource Survey (OARS), and Self-Reporter ADL. None of the 12 scales mentioned in our study is validated for the use in patients with PPS, the most scales found in the literatures reviewed in this research were NHP and ICIDH. Therefore, we found 9 scales validated in Brazil, Barthel Index, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), International Classification of Impairments, Disability's and Handicaps (ICIDH), Older Adult Resource Survey (OARS), Katz Index and Self-Reporter ADL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓灰质炎后综合征患者功能量表的使用
脊髓灰质炎后综合征(PPS)是一种神经系统疾病,导致神经肌肉功能下降,其特征是急性麻痹性脊髓灰质炎患者出现的一系列临床表现。患有PPS的患者开始对其adl的表现提出新的限制,同时倾向于忽略它们,以更大的体力继续他们的日常工作。因此,有必要进行功能评价,以查明发展中国家的承诺在哪里,并在不加重退行性PPS的情况下帮助他们。确定PPS患者的主要功能评估量表。对数据库中文章中描述的PPS患者使用的功能量表进行了文献研究综述。我们发现了12种日常生活活动功能量表,分别是:Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)、International Classification of impairment, Disability's and handicapped (ICIDH)、functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ)、Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (PASE)、Sunnas ADL Index、Katz Index、Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)、ADLs-Staircase、Barthel Index、functional Independence Measure (FIM)、Elderly Adult Resource Survey (OARS)、Self-Reporter ADL。我们研究中提到的12种量表均未被证实可用于PPS患者,本研究查阅的文献中发现的量表最多的是NHP和ICIDH。因此,我们找到了巴西验证的9种量表:Barthel指数、功能独立性量表(FIM)、功能状态问卷(FSQ)、跌倒效果量表(FES)、诺丁汉健康状况量表(NHP)、国际损伤、残疾和残障分类量表(ICIDH)、老年人资源调查量表(OARS)、Katz指数和自我报告ADL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ações de Ensino/Aprendizagem de Restaurações Indiretas por meio de Resina Direta Tratada Termicamente - RDTT: Relato de Experiência Análise de Enterobactérias em Emerita brasiliensis (Schmitt, 1935) Coletados na Praia de Balneário Rincão, Santa Catarina, Brasil “Gosto de ser livre, fazer as coisas no tempo que quero” Depoimentos de mulheres que optaram pela não maternidade Avaliação da qualidade de vida em pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço acometidos pela caquexia: uma revisão de literatura Strogonoff de frango enriquecido com biomassa de banana verde
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1