Efficient Persistent Fault Analysis with Small Number of Chosen Plaintexts

Fan Zhang, Run Huang, Tianxiang Feng, Xue Gong, Yulong Tao, Kui Ren, Xin-jie Zhao, Shize Guo
{"title":"Efficient Persistent Fault Analysis with Small Number of Chosen Plaintexts","authors":"Fan Zhang, Run Huang, Tianxiang Feng, Xue Gong, Yulong Tao, Kui Ren, Xin-jie Zhao, Shize Guo","doi":"10.46586/tches.v2023.i2.519-542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, Zhang et al. introduced the Persistent Fault Analysis (PFA) for the first time, which uses statistical features of ciphertexts caused by faulty Sbox to recover the key of block ciphers. However, for most of the variants of PFA, the prior knowledge of the fault (location and value) is required, where the corresponding analysis will get more difficult under the scenario of multiple faults. To bypass such perquisite and improve the analysis efficiency for multiple faults, we propose Chosen-Plaintext based Persistent Fault Analysis (CPPFA). CPPFA introduces chosen-plaintext to facilitate PFA and can reduce the key search space of AES-128 to extremely small. Our proposal requires 256 ciphertexts, while previous state-of-the-art work still requires 1509 and 1448 ciphertexts under 8 and 16 faults, respectively, at the only cost of requiring 256 chosen plaintexts. In particular, CPPFA can be applied to the multiple faults scenarios where all fault locations, values and quantity are unknown, and the worst time complexity of CPPFA is O(28+nf ) for AES-128, where nf represents the number of faults. The experimental results show that when nf > 4, 256 pairs of plaintext-ciphertext can recover the master key of AES-128. As for LED-64, only 16 pairs of plaintext-ciphertext reduce the remaining key search space to 210.","PeriodicalId":13186,"journal":{"name":"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.","volume":"13 1","pages":"519-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IACR Trans. Cryptogr. Hardw. Embed. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2023.i2.519-542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2018, Zhang et al. introduced the Persistent Fault Analysis (PFA) for the first time, which uses statistical features of ciphertexts caused by faulty Sbox to recover the key of block ciphers. However, for most of the variants of PFA, the prior knowledge of the fault (location and value) is required, where the corresponding analysis will get more difficult under the scenario of multiple faults. To bypass such perquisite and improve the analysis efficiency for multiple faults, we propose Chosen-Plaintext based Persistent Fault Analysis (CPPFA). CPPFA introduces chosen-plaintext to facilitate PFA and can reduce the key search space of AES-128 to extremely small. Our proposal requires 256 ciphertexts, while previous state-of-the-art work still requires 1509 and 1448 ciphertexts under 8 and 16 faults, respectively, at the only cost of requiring 256 chosen plaintexts. In particular, CPPFA can be applied to the multiple faults scenarios where all fault locations, values and quantity are unknown, and the worst time complexity of CPPFA is O(28+nf ) for AES-128, where nf represents the number of faults. The experimental results show that when nf > 4, 256 pairs of plaintext-ciphertext can recover the master key of AES-128. As for LED-64, only 16 pairs of plaintext-ciphertext reduce the remaining key search space to 210.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少量选择明文的有效持久故障分析
2018年,Zhang等首次引入了持久性故障分析(Persistent Fault Analysis, PFA),利用Sbox故障导致的密文统计特征来恢复分组密码的密钥。然而,对于大多数PFA变体,都需要故障的先验知识(位置和值),在多故障情况下,相应的分析将变得更加困难。为了绕过这些限制,提高多故障分析效率,我们提出了基于选择明文的持久性故障分析(CPPFA)。CPPFA引入了选择明文来简化PFA,可以将AES-128的密钥搜索空间压缩到极小。我们的提议需要256个密文,而以前最先进的工作仍然需要1509个和1448个密文,分别在8个和16个故障下,而唯一的代价是需要256个选择的明文。特别是,CPPFA可以应用于所有故障位置、故障值和故障数量都未知的多故障场景,对于AES-128, CPPFA的最坏时间复杂度为0 (28+nf),其中nf表示故障个数。实验结果表明,当nf > 4时,256对明文-密文可以恢复AES-128的主密钥。对于LED-64,只有16对明文-密文将剩余的密钥搜索空间减少到210。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MMM: Authenticated Encryption with Minimum Secret State for Masking Don't Forget Pairing-Friendly Curves with Odd Prime Embedding Degrees LPN-based Attacks in the White-box Setting Enhancing Quality and Security of the PLL-TRNG Protecting Dilithium against Leakage Revisited Sensitivity Analysis and Improved Implementations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1