Consensus on scales for an interdisciplinary health assessment tool for the elderly population

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Rev Rene Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.15253/2175-6783.20222378471
Maria Clara Duarte Monteiro, M. Martins, S. Schoeller
{"title":"Consensus on scales for an interdisciplinary health assessment tool for the elderly population","authors":"Maria Clara Duarte Monteiro, M. Martins, S. Schoeller","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222378471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to describe the consensus of the content of an instrument for assessing interdisciplinary health care of the elderly population. Methods: consensus study conducted among physicians, nurses, and social workers, contemplating the construction of instrument and the pre-test for selection of scales for use in practice. Questionnaire consisting of questions that identified representative scales in the assessment of the elderly. The scales that obtained consensus criterion of equal to or greater than 75% were considered selected by the experts. Sample was composed through snowball sampling, resulting in 101 participants. Results: of the 13 scales submitted,the professionals indicated that eight were suitable for use and two were already applied within their practice. The excluded became part of the recommendations for good practices in elderly care. A discrepancy was identified between what they consider to be useful and of interest versus what is applied in practice. Conclusion: consensus among experts allowed us to identify and select interdisciplinary assessment data for a proposed instrument to support the care process. Contributions to practice: this contributes to awareness about the use of recommended scales for the elderly and to avoid the overlapping of the same interventions by several professionals, with significant gains for this population.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222378471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: to describe the consensus of the content of an instrument for assessing interdisciplinary health care of the elderly population. Methods: consensus study conducted among physicians, nurses, and social workers, contemplating the construction of instrument and the pre-test for selection of scales for use in practice. Questionnaire consisting of questions that identified representative scales in the assessment of the elderly. The scales that obtained consensus criterion of equal to or greater than 75% were considered selected by the experts. Sample was composed through snowball sampling, resulting in 101 participants. Results: of the 13 scales submitted,the professionals indicated that eight were suitable for use and two were already applied within their practice. The excluded became part of the recommendations for good practices in elderly care. A discrepancy was identified between what they consider to be useful and of interest versus what is applied in practice. Conclusion: consensus among experts allowed us to identify and select interdisciplinary assessment data for a proposed instrument to support the care process. Contributions to practice: this contributes to awareness about the use of recommended scales for the elderly and to avoid the overlapping of the same interventions by several professionals, with significant gains for this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对老年人跨学科健康评估工具量表的共识
目的:描述对老年人跨学科卫生保健评估工具内容的共识。方法:在医生、护士和社工中进行共识性研究,探讨工具的构建和量表选择的预试,以供实践使用。问卷由确定老年人评估中代表性量表的问题组成。获得等于或大于75%的一致标准的量表被认为是由专家选择的。样本采用滚雪球抽样法组成,共101人。结果:在提交的13个量表中,专业人员表示8个适合使用,2个已经在他们的实践中应用。被排除在外的人成为老年人护理良好做法建议的一部分。他们认为有用和感兴趣的东西与实际应用之间存在差异。结论:专家之间的共识使我们能够识别和选择跨学科的评估数据,为拟议的工具来支持护理过程。对实践的贡献:这有助于提高对老年人使用推荐量表的认识,并避免几个专业人员重复使用相同的干预措施,为老年人带来了重大收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shift work disorder among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia Mortality from HIV/AIDS in adolescents and young adults: a temporal time series University Open to Older People: factors associated with the use of information and communication technologies Sleep quality and burnout in higher education teachers Nursing interventions for fall prevention in hospitalized aged people: an integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1