PATIENTS’ OPINION ON HEALTH CARE QUALITY IN MUNICIPAL (COMMUNITY) HOSPITALS IN BULGARIA

Elisaveta Petrova Geretto, Z. Petrova
{"title":"PATIENTS’ OPINION ON HEALTH CARE QUALITY IN MUNICIPAL (COMMUNITY) HOSPITALS IN BULGARIA","authors":"Elisaveta Petrova Geretto, Z. Petrova","doi":"10.18509/gbp.2019.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main aims of Bulgarian health care reform is to provide timely, equal and open access to healthcare resources, which would allow for optimal healthcare, improvement of health status and increased quality of life. Bulgarian health system tendencies, particularly during the last decade are as follows: population size is diminishing, working age population is diminishing, physicians’ and medical specialists’ numbers are diminishing, while the number of health establishments, in particular, hospitals and hospital beds is rising, patients’ numbers are increasing, financial resources dedicated to health are increasing and last but not least the number of sick days per year are also increasing. The aim of the present research is to study patients’ opinion on municipal (community) hospitals with regards to medical services and to indicate possible approaches for optimizing medical services. The opinion of 195 patients in 10 municipal hospitals has been studied. The qquestionnaire consists of 20 separate questions, quantitative and qualitative indicators are related to various characteristics. Quantitative indicator is age, while qualitative indicators are: gender; education; reasons for hospitalisation; opinion on provision of information on the disease, diagnostics, treatment, prognosis and recommendations for follow up treatment; assessment of service quality in the hospital; opinion on patients’ needs; assessment of hospital organisation and patient satisfactions. Results and conclusions: 1. Quality medical care, according to respondents, is the top priority for patient’s satisfaction, followed by individual treatment for every patient. Quality of hospital building and rooms has considerably less weight. 2. Provision of detailed information on the disease, diagnostics, treatment, prognosis and recommendations for follow up treatment contributes significantly to increased patients’ satisfactions. 3. In general, patients approve highly of the medical services quality, irrespective of several critical downfalls on work organisation and hospital accommodation. Yet, patients would gladly recommend the particular hospital to their families and friends. 4. Patients assess highly qualification of medical staff, technical equipment, service quality while they comment negatively underpayment of medical staff in relation to their workload and efforts.","PeriodicalId":9293,"journal":{"name":"BSAVA Congress Proceedings 2019","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSAVA Congress Proceedings 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18509/gbp.2019.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main aims of Bulgarian health care reform is to provide timely, equal and open access to healthcare resources, which would allow for optimal healthcare, improvement of health status and increased quality of life. Bulgarian health system tendencies, particularly during the last decade are as follows: population size is diminishing, working age population is diminishing, physicians’ and medical specialists’ numbers are diminishing, while the number of health establishments, in particular, hospitals and hospital beds is rising, patients’ numbers are increasing, financial resources dedicated to health are increasing and last but not least the number of sick days per year are also increasing. The aim of the present research is to study patients’ opinion on municipal (community) hospitals with regards to medical services and to indicate possible approaches for optimizing medical services. The opinion of 195 patients in 10 municipal hospitals has been studied. The qquestionnaire consists of 20 separate questions, quantitative and qualitative indicators are related to various characteristics. Quantitative indicator is age, while qualitative indicators are: gender; education; reasons for hospitalisation; opinion on provision of information on the disease, diagnostics, treatment, prognosis and recommendations for follow up treatment; assessment of service quality in the hospital; opinion on patients’ needs; assessment of hospital organisation and patient satisfactions. Results and conclusions: 1. Quality medical care, according to respondents, is the top priority for patient’s satisfaction, followed by individual treatment for every patient. Quality of hospital building and rooms has considerably less weight. 2. Provision of detailed information on the disease, diagnostics, treatment, prognosis and recommendations for follow up treatment contributes significantly to increased patients’ satisfactions. 3. In general, patients approve highly of the medical services quality, irrespective of several critical downfalls on work organisation and hospital accommodation. Yet, patients would gladly recommend the particular hospital to their families and friends. 4. Patients assess highly qualification of medical staff, technical equipment, service quality while they comment negatively underpayment of medical staff in relation to their workload and efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对保加利亚市级(社区)医院医疗质量的意见
保加利亚保健改革的主要目标之一是提供及时、平等和开放的保健资源,从而实现最佳保健、改善健康状况和提高生活质量。保加利亚保健系统的趋势,特别是在过去十年中是这样的:人口规模在减少,工作年龄人口在减少,医生和医学专家的人数在减少,而保健机构的数量,特别是医院和医院床位的数量在增加,病人人数在增加,专门用于保健的财政资源在增加,最后但并非最不重要的是,每年的病假也在增加。本研究的目的是了解病人对市(社区)医院医疗服务的意见,并指出优化医疗服务的可能途径。对10所市立医院195名患者的意见进行了调查。qquestionnaire由20个独立的问题组成,定量和定性指标涉及到各种特征。定量指标为年龄,定性指标为:性别;教育;住院原因;关于提供疾病信息、诊断、治疗、预后和后续治疗建议的意见;医院服务质量评价;对患者需求的意见;医院组织和患者满意度评估。结果与结论:1。受访者认为,患者满意度最高的是优质医疗服务,其次是个体化治疗。医院建筑和房间的质量大大减轻了重量。2. 提供有关疾病、诊断、治疗、预后和后续治疗建议的详细信息,有助于显著提高患者的满意度。3.总的来说,病人对医疗服务质量的评价很高,尽管在工作组织和医院住宿方面出现了一些严重的问题。然而,病人会很乐意向他们的家人和朋友推荐这家医院。4. 患者对医务人员的素质、技术设备、服务质量评价很高,但对医务人员的工作量和努力报酬过低的情况评价不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TEMPORARY DYNAMICS OF WATER TEMPERATURE IN THE CARPATHIAN DAM RESERVOIR (BESKO IN THE UPPER VISTULA BASIN) UNIVERSITY CITIES AND THEIR ROLE IN THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF CREATIVE ECONOMIES PROJECTION OF THE ROMA POPULATION IN BULGARIA (2020-2050) OUTLINES OF THE ÇAYIRBAĞI OPHIOLITES OF KONYA (CENTRAL ANATOLIA) UAS BASED RAPID MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF SAND DUNES ALONG THE BULGARIAN BLACK SEA COST: THE CASE OF “CORAL†BEACH, BULGARIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1