Comparative Study between Continuous Thoracic Epidural vs. Thoracic Spinal Anaesthesia in Breast Surgery

A. Ahmed, H. Ali, O. Helal, Tarek Sobhi
{"title":"Comparative Study between Continuous Thoracic Epidural vs. Thoracic Spinal Anaesthesia in Breast Surgery","authors":"A. Ahmed, H. Ali, O. Helal, Tarek Sobhi","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this work is to compare between thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (TSA) conducted for breast surgeries as regard to hemodynamic changes (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, ETCO2), postoperative pain control, postoperative analgesic requirements, surgeon satisfaction, postoperative ambulation time and perioperative complication. \nSetting: Al-Hussein and Sayed Galal hospitals. \nPatients and Methods: This work was done upon 40 female patient undergoing breast surgeries. Patients were divided randomly into 2 equal groups according to the type of anesthetic technique had been chosen. Group I were anaesthetized by thoracic epidural anesthesia and group II by segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia. \nResults: Recovery and ambulation time was more or less equal in the both groups. This is important since the patient can readily return to her family and social environment and can decrease the cost of the procedure, although this was not specifically assessed in this study. Post-operative pain was compared at the time 0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 hour by using VAS. \nConclusion: We found that epidural blockade a preferred choice of anesthetic management for breast surgery.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this work is to compare between thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) and segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (TSA) conducted for breast surgeries as regard to hemodynamic changes (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, ETCO2), postoperative pain control, postoperative analgesic requirements, surgeon satisfaction, postoperative ambulation time and perioperative complication. Setting: Al-Hussein and Sayed Galal hospitals. Patients and Methods: This work was done upon 40 female patient undergoing breast surgeries. Patients were divided randomly into 2 equal groups according to the type of anesthetic technique had been chosen. Group I were anaesthetized by thoracic epidural anesthesia and group II by segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia. Results: Recovery and ambulation time was more or less equal in the both groups. This is important since the patient can readily return to her family and social environment and can decrease the cost of the procedure, although this was not specifically assessed in this study. Post-operative pain was compared at the time 0, 1, 2, 4 and 8 hour by using VAS. Conclusion: We found that epidural blockade a preferred choice of anesthetic management for breast surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸部手术中连续胸段硬膜外麻醉与胸段脊髓麻醉的比较研究
目的:比较胸段性硬膜外麻醉(TEA)与胸段性脊髓麻醉(TSA)在乳房手术中血流动力学变化(血压、心率、血氧饱和度、ETCO2)、术后疼痛控制、术后镇痛需求、外科医生满意度、术后下床时间及围手术期并发症等方面的差异。环境:Al-Hussein和Sayed Galal医院。患者和方法:本研究对40例接受乳房手术的女性患者进行了研究。根据麻醉方式的不同,将患者随机分为两组。第一组采用胸段硬膜外麻醉,第二组采用胸段性脊髓麻醉。结果:两组患者的恢复时间和活动时间基本相同。这是很重要的,因为患者可以很容易地回到她的家庭和社会环境中,并可以降低手术的成本,尽管这在本研究中没有特别评估。采用VAS比较术后0、1、2、4、8小时疼痛情况。结论:我们发现硬膜外阻滞是乳房手术麻醉管理的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurogenic information in autoimmune diseases and chronic pain syndromes Predictive Validity of Lumbar X-ray Images and MRIs for Chronic Low Back Pain Subtypes Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Spontaneous Pain in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Dexketoprofen for Mild to Moderate Pain among Filipino Adults: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1