D. G. da Silva, K. F. Moura, A. C. de Souza, Kenny Gutemberg Nunes Silva, C. B. Vidigal, Juliana da Silva Jezuíno, Rafaella Cardoso Gravena, G. G. Pelosi, D. C. Gerardin, Maria do Carmo Franco, G. Ceravolo
{"title":"Topiramate treatment during the peripubertal period does not alter aortic endothelial function in female Wistar rats.","authors":"D. G. da Silva, K. F. Moura, A. C. de Souza, Kenny Gutemberg Nunes Silva, C. B. Vidigal, Juliana da Silva Jezuíno, Rafaella Cardoso Gravena, G. G. Pelosi, D. C. Gerardin, Maria do Carmo Franco, G. Ceravolo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4333542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nThis study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term adverse effects of blood pressure (BP), vascular endothelial function, and estrogen receptor (ERα and ERβ) modulation on endothelial function in female Wistar rats treated with topiramate (TPM), an antiepileptic drug, during the peripubertal period.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nFemale Wistar rats were treated with TPM (41 mg/kg) or water (CTR group) by gavage from postnatal day (PND) 28 to 50 (peripubertal phase). At the end of the treatment, the TPM and CTR rats were divided into two groups and evaluated after 24 h or from PND 85 (adulthood). The rats were evaluated for: thoracic aorta reactivity to phenylephrine (Phenyl), acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP); aortic ring reactivity after ERα and ERβ antagonism; and BP.\n\n\nKEY FINDINGS\nIt was observed that vascular response to Phenyl, ACh, and SNP was similar between TPM and CTR rats in the short- and long-term evaluations. In addition, the ER antagonism did not interfere with aortic contraction or relaxation in either TPM or CTR.\n\n\nSIGNIFICANCE\nTaken together, the results show that TPM treatment during the peripubertal period does not alter aortic endothelial function and its estrogen modulation via classic ER in female Wistar rats, suggesting that TPM treatment in this period is safe for the vascular system.","PeriodicalId":11962,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIMS
This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term adverse effects of blood pressure (BP), vascular endothelial function, and estrogen receptor (ERα and ERβ) modulation on endothelial function in female Wistar rats treated with topiramate (TPM), an antiepileptic drug, during the peripubertal period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Female Wistar rats were treated with TPM (41 mg/kg) or water (CTR group) by gavage from postnatal day (PND) 28 to 50 (peripubertal phase). At the end of the treatment, the TPM and CTR rats were divided into two groups and evaluated after 24 h or from PND 85 (adulthood). The rats were evaluated for: thoracic aorta reactivity to phenylephrine (Phenyl), acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP); aortic ring reactivity after ERα and ERβ antagonism; and BP.
KEY FINDINGS
It was observed that vascular response to Phenyl, ACh, and SNP was similar between TPM and CTR rats in the short- and long-term evaluations. In addition, the ER antagonism did not interfere with aortic contraction or relaxation in either TPM or CTR.
SIGNIFICANCE
Taken together, the results show that TPM treatment during the peripubertal period does not alter aortic endothelial function and its estrogen modulation via classic ER in female Wistar rats, suggesting that TPM treatment in this period is safe for the vascular system.