THE ANALYSIS OF HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGIES ON COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN PREVENTING STUNTING FOR MOTHERS WITH TODDLERS AT BANGUN PURBA SUB-DISTRICT

Maria Putri, Rezeki Siregar, R. K. Rochadi, L. S. Andayani
{"title":"THE ANALYSIS OF HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGIES ON COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN PREVENTING STUNTING FOR MOTHERS WITH TODDLERS AT BANGUN PURBA SUB-DISTRICT","authors":"Maria Putri, Rezeki Siregar, R. K. Rochadi, L. S. Andayani","doi":"10.56943/jsh.v2i2.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Stunting is a growth disorder in children under five due to chronic malnutrition and recurrent infections. Therefore, efforts are needed to increase community participation in preventing stunting and the strategy to implement a health promotion strategy. Bangun Purba sub-district has been included in the stunting locus since 2020. This study aimed to analyze health promotion strategies (advocacy, partnerships, and community empowerment) on community participation in stunting prevention. Method. This type of research was a mixed method with an explanatory sequential design with a quantitative approach of interviewing 131 respondents and qualitative with in-depth interviews with 10 informants. The data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression). Result & Analysis. The results showed that 49.6% of respondents stated that advocacy was not good, there was an influence between advocacy and community participation (p=0.046), but the implementation of advocacy was good enough, along with public commitment and government support. The partnership was stated by 72.2% of respondents in the not good category because partnerships in stunting prevention not implemented optimally, there was an influence between partnerships on community participation (p=0.042). Community empowerment was stated by 72.5% of respondents in not good category due to activities not running actively, there was an influence between community empowerment on community participation (p=0.038). The community empowerment variable was the greatest variable influence on community participation with OR = 0.536. Discussion. Good coordination and synergize well in the prevention and control of stunting so that Deli Serdang Regency becomes a stunting-free Regency.","PeriodicalId":22927,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of scientific articles \"Health and Education millennium","volume":"208 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of scientific articles \"Health and Education millennium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56943/jsh.v2i2.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Stunting is a growth disorder in children under five due to chronic malnutrition and recurrent infections. Therefore, efforts are needed to increase community participation in preventing stunting and the strategy to implement a health promotion strategy. Bangun Purba sub-district has been included in the stunting locus since 2020. This study aimed to analyze health promotion strategies (advocacy, partnerships, and community empowerment) on community participation in stunting prevention. Method. This type of research was a mixed method with an explanatory sequential design with a quantitative approach of interviewing 131 respondents and qualitative with in-depth interviews with 10 informants. The data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression). Result & Analysis. The results showed that 49.6% of respondents stated that advocacy was not good, there was an influence between advocacy and community participation (p=0.046), but the implementation of advocacy was good enough, along with public commitment and government support. The partnership was stated by 72.2% of respondents in the not good category because partnerships in stunting prevention not implemented optimally, there was an influence between partnerships on community participation (p=0.042). Community empowerment was stated by 72.5% of respondents in not good category due to activities not running actively, there was an influence between community empowerment on community participation (p=0.038). The community empowerment variable was the greatest variable influence on community participation with OR = 0.536. Discussion. Good coordination and synergize well in the prevention and control of stunting so that Deli Serdang Regency becomes a stunting-free Regency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
班冈普尔巴街道社区参与预防幼儿母亲发育迟缓的健康促进战略分析
介绍。发育迟缓是五岁以下儿童由于慢性营养不良和反复感染而出现的一种生长障碍。因此,需要努力增加社区参与预防发育迟缓和执行促进健康战略的战略。自2020年以来,班冈普尔巴街道已被列入发育迟缓发生地。本研究旨在分析社区参与预防发育迟缓的健康促进策略(宣传、伙伴关系和社区赋权)。方法。这种类型的研究是一种混合方法,解释顺序设计,定量方法采访131名受访者,定性与10名被调查者进行深入访谈。采用单因素、双因素和多因素分析(logistic回归)对数据进行分析。结果与分析。结果显示,49.6%的受访者认为倡导不好,倡导与社区参与之间存在影响(p=0.046),但倡导的实施还不错,公众承诺和政府支持也不错。72.2%的受访者认为伙伴关系不好,因为预防发育迟缓的伙伴关系没有得到最佳实施,伙伴关系之间对社区参与有影响(p=0.042)。72.5%的受访者表示社区赋权不佳,因为活动不积极,社区赋权对社区参与有影响(p=0.038)。社区赋权变量对社区参与的影响最大,OR = 0.536。讨论。在预防和控制发育迟缓方面进行良好的协调和协同,使德里塞当县成为一个无发育迟缓的县。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PREVENTING HYPOTENSION CAUSED BY SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN NON PREECLAPMTIC PREGNANCIES WITH CAESAREAN SECTION ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING COMMUNITY-BASED HYPERTENSION CONTROL EFFORTS FACTORS AFFECTING MEDICATION ADHERENCE LEVEL IN DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENS: A LITERATURE REVIEW DESCRIPTION OF THE QUALITY OF THE TEAM'S PROFESSIONAL NURSING CARE MODEL (MAKP) IMPLEMENTATION WOUND CARE WITH MOIST WOUND DRESSINGS FOR HEALING DIABETIC GANGRENE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1