Perceived Family and Partner Support and the Work-Family Interface: A Meta-analytic Review

H. Kelley, Ashley B. LeBaron‐Black, E. Hill, Diana J. Meter
{"title":"Perceived Family and Partner Support and the Work-Family Interface: A Meta-analytic Review","authors":"H. Kelley, Ashley B. LeBaron‐Black, E. Hill, Diana J. Meter","doi":"10.5093/jwop2021a15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study employed meta-analytic techniques to elucidate the role of perceived partner and family support in four measures of the work-family interface. We extracted 183 effect sizes from 82 samples and a total of N = 36,226 individuals. We found perceived familial (partner and family) support was negatively associated with work-to-family conflict (r = -.099) and family-to-work conflict (r = -.178). It was positively associated with work-to-family enrichment (r = .173) and family-to-work enrichment (r = .378). Various sample-level moderators were investigated through meta regression and subgroup analyses, including whether the support measure was family or partner focused. Perceived family support showed larger magnitude associations with the two conflict outcome variables than partner support, while there were no significant differences between family and partner support and the two enrichment outcomes. The results suggest that familial support is an essential component of successfully minimizing work-family conflict and maximizing work-family enrichment, and that whether the measure of support is partner or family specific may impact the magnitude of results. El apoyo familiar y de pareja percibido y la interconexión trabajo-familia: una revisión metaanalítica","PeriodicalId":46388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a15","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study employed meta-analytic techniques to elucidate the role of perceived partner and family support in four measures of the work-family interface. We extracted 183 effect sizes from 82 samples and a total of N = 36,226 individuals. We found perceived familial (partner and family) support was negatively associated with work-to-family conflict (r = -.099) and family-to-work conflict (r = -.178). It was positively associated with work-to-family enrichment (r = .173) and family-to-work enrichment (r = .378). Various sample-level moderators were investigated through meta regression and subgroup analyses, including whether the support measure was family or partner focused. Perceived family support showed larger magnitude associations with the two conflict outcome variables than partner support, while there were no significant differences between family and partner support and the two enrichment outcomes. The results suggest that familial support is an essential component of successfully minimizing work-family conflict and maximizing work-family enrichment, and that whether the measure of support is partner or family specific may impact the magnitude of results. El apoyo familiar y de pareja percibido y la interconexión trabajo-familia: una revisión metaanalítica
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知家庭、伴侣支持与工作-家庭界面:一项元分析回顾
本研究采用元分析的方法来阐明感知伴侣和家庭支持在工作家庭界面的四项测量中的作用。我们从82个样本中提取了183个效应量,总共N = 36226个个体。我们发现感知到的家庭(伴侣和家庭)支持与工作与家庭冲突(r = - 0.099)和家庭与工作冲突(r = - 0.178)呈负相关。它与工作对家庭的富集(r = .173)和家庭对工作的富集(r = .378)呈正相关。通过meta回归和亚组分析调查了各种样本水平的调节因子,包括支持措施是否以家庭或伴侣为重点。感知到的家庭支持与两个冲突结果变量的相关性大于伴侣支持,而家庭和伴侣支持与两个充实结果之间没有显著差异。结果表明,家庭支持是成功减少工作-家庭冲突和最大限度地提高工作-家庭丰富性的重要组成部分,并且无论支持的测量是伴侣还是家庭都可能影响结果的大小。El apoyo familiar y de pareja percibido y la interconexión trabajo-familia: una revisión metaanalítica
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Validez Predictiva e Igualdad de Trato de la “Oposición” como Método de Selección para Inspectores de Hacienda y Técnicos de Hacienda del Estado Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Workers’ Production of Safe Food Heavy Work Investment, Workaholism, Servant Leadership, and Organizational Outcomes: A Study among Italian Workers Diversity of Social Ties and Employee Innovation: The Importance of Informal Learning and Reciprocity Big Four LinkedIn Dimensions: Signals of Soft Skills?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1