Lithogeochemistry of clayey rocks and volcanic tuffs in the Vendian succession of the western slope of the Middle Urals: similarities and differences

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.21638/spbu07.2020.309
A. Maslov
{"title":"Lithogeochemistry of clayey rocks and volcanic tuffs in the Vendian succession of the western slope of the Middle Urals: similarities and differences","authors":"A. Maslov","doi":"10.21638/spbu07.2020.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lithogeochemical features of gray- and green-colored, as well as red-colored clayey rocks and volcanic tuffs found among Vendian deposits of the western slope of the Middle Urals (Serebryanka Group, Koiva Formation; Sylvitsa Group, Starye pechi Formation, Chernyi Kamen Formation) are considered. The materials presented and their analysis make it possible to reasonably assume that clayey rocks of usual color and their red-colored varieties do not fundamentally differ in their characteristics. On the discriminant lithogeochemical diagrams, their data points form fields characterized by significant, if not almost complete, overlaps. Moreover, as follows from an analysis of the Strakhov and Boström module values, as well as the position of the data points on the (Y/Ho) PAAS –(Ce/Ce *) PAAS diagram, they do not contain exhalation components. The sources of the fine-grained aluminosilicoclastic material for clayey rocks of different colors were mainly acidic (magmatic?) rocks. Volcanic tuffs, on the contrary, are composed of material similar in composition to trachyandesites, andesites, and trachyandesibasalts. The data presented in the article give reason to believe that the red color of many clay rocks present among the Vendian deposits of the Middle Urals is the result of pedogenic processes, as is expected for the red-colored rocks present among the Upper Riphean and Vendian deposits of the Southern Urals. On the other hand, some of the interlayers that we took in the field for volcanic tuffs, as previously assumed, can be ordinary sedimentary rocks, the color of which was changed by secondary processes (gleying, etc.), including modern ones.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2020.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The lithogeochemical features of gray- and green-colored, as well as red-colored clayey rocks and volcanic tuffs found among Vendian deposits of the western slope of the Middle Urals (Serebryanka Group, Koiva Formation; Sylvitsa Group, Starye pechi Formation, Chernyi Kamen Formation) are considered. The materials presented and their analysis make it possible to reasonably assume that clayey rocks of usual color and their red-colored varieties do not fundamentally differ in their characteristics. On the discriminant lithogeochemical diagrams, their data points form fields characterized by significant, if not almost complete, overlaps. Moreover, as follows from an analysis of the Strakhov and Boström module values, as well as the position of the data points on the (Y/Ho) PAAS –(Ce/Ce *) PAAS diagram, they do not contain exhalation components. The sources of the fine-grained aluminosilicoclastic material for clayey rocks of different colors were mainly acidic (magmatic?) rocks. Volcanic tuffs, on the contrary, are composed of material similar in composition to trachyandesites, andesites, and trachyandesibasalts. The data presented in the article give reason to believe that the red color of many clay rocks present among the Vendian deposits of the Middle Urals is the result of pedogenic processes, as is expected for the red-colored rocks present among the Upper Riphean and Vendian deposits of the Southern Urals. On the other hand, some of the interlayers that we took in the field for volcanic tuffs, as previously assumed, can be ordinary sedimentary rocks, the color of which was changed by secondary processes (gleying, etc.), including modern ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
中乌拉尔西坡文甸演替中粘土岩和火山凝灰岩的岩石地球化学:异同
中乌拉尔西坡塞雷布良卡组科瓦组文甸沉积中灰绿色和红色粘土岩和火山凝灰岩的岩石地球化学特征;考虑Sylvitsa组、Starye pechi组、Chernyi Kamen组)。所提出的材料及其分析使我们有可能合理地假设,通常颜色的粘土岩石和它们的红色品种在特征上没有根本区别。在区别性的岩石地球化学图上,它们的数据点形成了具有显著重叠(如果不是几乎完全重叠的话)特征的场。此外,从Strakhov和Boström模块值的分析以及(Y/Ho) PAAS - (Ce/Ce *) PAAS图上数据点的位置可以看出,它们不包含呼气成分。不同颜色粘土岩的细粒铝硅碎屑物质来源以酸性(岩浆岩)为主。相反,火山凝灰岩的成分与粗面山岩、安山岩和粗面山岩玄武岩相似。本文所提供的资料使我们有理由相信,乌拉尔中部文甸矿床中许多粘土岩的红色是成土作用的结果,正如我们所期望的那样,乌拉尔南部上里芬和文甸矿床中的红色岩石也是如此。另一方面,我们在火山凝灰岩领域所取的一些中间层,如先前所假定的,可能是普通的沉积岩,其颜色被次生作用(闪变等)改变,包括现代的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1