Health Literacy Perceptions and Knowledge in Pediatric Continuity Practices

E. Griffeth, I. Sharif, Alexandria Caldwell, M. Townsend Cooper, Hollyce Tyrrell, M. Dunlap
{"title":"Health Literacy Perceptions and Knowledge in Pediatric Continuity Practices","authors":"E. Griffeth, I. Sharif, Alexandria Caldwell, M. Townsend Cooper, Hollyce Tyrrell, M. Dunlap","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220208-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low health literacy affects one-third of adults in the United States and can have a negative effect on health behavior and outcomes. Objective: The goal of this study was to examine attitudes and knowledge of health literacy among pediatric residents and faculty in pediatric resident continuity clinics across the country. Methods: An online mixed-methods survey was distributed to pediatric faculty and residents through the Academic Pediatric Association's Continuity Research Network. The 20-question survey included questions about the participants' health literacy knowledge and health literacy practices in continuity clinics, such as use of universal health literacy precautions. Categorical answer choices were dichotomized into positive and negative groupings and resident and faculty responses were compared using the Chi-squared test (significance p < .05). Qualitative data were analyzed using emergent coding and grounded theory to determine themes. Key Results: Responses were received from 402 individuals at 24 pediatric residency programs. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that they could correctly identify participants with low health literacy (76% residents vs. 53% faculty). Only 19% of residents and 26% of faculty were familiar with universal health literacy precautions. Many residents and faculty had received no training in health literacy (37% residents vs. 38% faculty). Barriers and challenges around health literacy included time, language, limited training or resources, low literacy, disease mismanagement, and fixed misconceptions. Conclusion: Despite ample evidence in the literature to the contrary, most respondents believed they could correctly identify individuals with low health literacy. Additionally, most participants had not heard of universal health literacy precautions and were unaware of their usage in their practice setting. This is not consistent with current expert recommendations. These findings are troubling as they are from academic residency programs, indicating an educational deficit. These findings point toward a next step in health literacy education for pediatric residents. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(1):e51–e60.] Plain Language Summary: Pediatric residents and faculty in continuity clinics were surveyed about their opinions, health literacy knowledge, ability, and practices in continuity clinics. Despite evidence to the contrary, most respondents believed they could correctly identify individuals with low health literacy and had not heard of universal health literacy precautions. These findings highlight the need for more health literacy education for pediatric residents.","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"e51 - e60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220208-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Low health literacy affects one-third of adults in the United States and can have a negative effect on health behavior and outcomes. Objective: The goal of this study was to examine attitudes and knowledge of health literacy among pediatric residents and faculty in pediatric resident continuity clinics across the country. Methods: An online mixed-methods survey was distributed to pediatric faculty and residents through the Academic Pediatric Association's Continuity Research Network. The 20-question survey included questions about the participants' health literacy knowledge and health literacy practices in continuity clinics, such as use of universal health literacy precautions. Categorical answer choices were dichotomized into positive and negative groupings and resident and faculty responses were compared using the Chi-squared test (significance p < .05). Qualitative data were analyzed using emergent coding and grounded theory to determine themes. Key Results: Responses were received from 402 individuals at 24 pediatric residency programs. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that they could correctly identify participants with low health literacy (76% residents vs. 53% faculty). Only 19% of residents and 26% of faculty were familiar with universal health literacy precautions. Many residents and faculty had received no training in health literacy (37% residents vs. 38% faculty). Barriers and challenges around health literacy included time, language, limited training or resources, low literacy, disease mismanagement, and fixed misconceptions. Conclusion: Despite ample evidence in the literature to the contrary, most respondents believed they could correctly identify individuals with low health literacy. Additionally, most participants had not heard of universal health literacy precautions and were unaware of their usage in their practice setting. This is not consistent with current expert recommendations. These findings are troubling as they are from academic residency programs, indicating an educational deficit. These findings point toward a next step in health literacy education for pediatric residents. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(1):e51–e60.] Plain Language Summary: Pediatric residents and faculty in continuity clinics were surveyed about their opinions, health literacy knowledge, ability, and practices in continuity clinics. Despite evidence to the contrary, most respondents believed they could correctly identify individuals with low health literacy and had not heard of universal health literacy precautions. These findings highlight the need for more health literacy education for pediatric residents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童连续性实践中的健康素养认知和知识
背景:低健康素养影响着美国三分之一的成年人,并可能对健康行为和结果产生负面影响。目的:本研究的目的是考察全国儿科住院医师和儿科住院医师连续性诊所的教师对健康素养的态度和知识。方法:通过儿科学术协会的连续性研究网络,对儿科教师和住院医师进行在线混合方法调查。20个问题的调查包括关于参与者的健康素养知识和连续性诊所的健康素养实践的问题,例如普遍健康素养预防措施的使用。分类答案选择被分为积极组和消极组,住院医师和教师的回答使用卡方检验进行比较(显著性p < 0.05)。定性数据分析使用紧急编码和扎根理论来确定主题。主要结果:我们收到了来自24个儿科住院医师项目的402名患者的反馈。大多数参与者同意或强烈同意他们可以正确识别健康素养低的参与者(76%的居民对53%的教师)。只有19%的居民和26%的教师熟悉全民健康素养预防措施。许多住院医生和教师没有接受过健康素养方面的培训(37%的住院医生对38%的教师)。卫生知识普及方面的障碍和挑战包括时间、语言、培训或资源有限、识字率低、疾病管理不善以及固有的误解。结论:尽管文献中有大量相反的证据,但大多数受访者认为他们可以正确识别健康素养低的个体。此外,大多数参与者没有听说过全民健康知识普及预防措施,也不知道这些措施在实践环境中的使用情况。这与目前的专家建议不一致。这些发现令人不安,因为它们来自学术住院医师项目,表明了教育赤字。这些发现为儿科住院医师的健康素养教育指明了下一步。健康素养研究与实践[j] .中国医学工程学报,2010;6(1):551 - 560。摘要:对连续性诊所的儿科住院医师和教师的意见、健康素养知识、能力和在连续性诊所的实践进行了调查。尽管有相反的证据,但大多数答复者认为,他们能够正确识别卫生知识普及程度低的个人,并且没有听说过普及卫生知识的预防措施。这些发现强调了对儿科住院医师进行更多健康素养教育的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1