Comparative study of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke

Haibing Ren, Hui-qin Liu, Si-Yang Wang, Jianying Zhang, Wenjin Yang, Xiaohui Zhao, Ke Qing, G. Xiao, Yongjun Cao
{"title":"Comparative study of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke","authors":"Haibing Ren, Hui-qin Liu, Si-Yang Wang, Jianying Zhang, Wenjin Yang, Xiaohui Zhao, Ke Qing, G. Xiao, Yongjun Cao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo comparatively analyze the safety and efficacy of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 116 patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke, admitted to our hospitals from October 2015 to March 2018, were chosen in our study; their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients accepted direct mechanical thrombectomy and 53 accepted bridging therapy. The preoperative baseline data and the diagnoses and treatments of the two groups were analyzed; the degrees of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI), incidences of hemorrhage transformation and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores and mortality rate 90 d after operation were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nThe preoperative Alberta stroke program early CT scale (ASPECTS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of the direct mechanical thrombectomy group were significantly lower than those of the bridge therapy group (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe clinical efficacy and safety of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke are similar. \n \n \nKey words: \nIschemic stroke; Anterior circulation; Mechanical thrombectomy; Intravenous thrombolysis; Bridging therapy","PeriodicalId":10104,"journal":{"name":"中华神经医学杂志","volume":"9 1","pages":"131-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华神经医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2020.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To comparatively analyze the safety and efficacy of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke. Methods A total of 116 patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke, admitted to our hospitals from October 2015 to March 2018, were chosen in our study; their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 63 patients accepted direct mechanical thrombectomy and 53 accepted bridging therapy. The preoperative baseline data and the diagnoses and treatments of the two groups were analyzed; the degrees of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI), incidences of hemorrhage transformation and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores and mortality rate 90 d after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The preoperative Alberta stroke program early CT scale (ASPECTS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of the direct mechanical thrombectomy group were significantly lower than those of the bridge therapy group (P 0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy and safety of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for patients with acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke are similar. Key words: Ischemic stroke; Anterior circulation; Mechanical thrombectomy; Intravenous thrombolysis; Bridging therapy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接机械取栓与桥接治疗急性前循环大动脉闭塞性脑卒中的比较研究
目的比较分析直接机械取栓与桥接治疗急性前循环大动脉闭塞性脑卒中的安全性和有效性。方法选取2015年10月至2018年3月我院收治的116例急性前循环大动脉闭塞性脑卒中患者作为研究对象;回顾性分析其临床资料。其中直接机械取栓63例,桥接治疗53例。分析两组患者术前基线资料及诊治情况;比较两组脑梗死改良溶栓程度(mTICI)、出血转化及症状性颅内出血发生率、改良Rankin评分(mRS)及术后90 d死亡率。结果直接机械取栓组术前Alberta卒中程序早期CT评分(ASPECTS)和Glasgow昏迷评分(GCS)均显著低于桥接治疗组(P < 0.05)。结论直接机械取栓与桥接治疗急性前循环大动脉闭塞性脑卒中的临床疗效和安全性相似。关键词:缺血性脑卒中;前循环;机械血栓切除术;静脉溶栓;桥接治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华神经医学杂志
中华神经医学杂志 Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6272
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Perioperative risk factors associated with prognoses of patients with acute ischemic stroke accepted mechanical thrombectomy Recent advance in relation between chronic subdural hematoma and intracranial vein circulation Intraoperative ultrasound in microsurgical resection of supratentorial cavernous malformations Comparative study of direct mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy for acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke Changes of functional brain networks and their relations with cognitive function in patients with end-stage renal disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1