Training residents in pediatric literacy: impact on knowledge, attitudes and practice

Ann Hazzard, Sharon Dabrow, Marianne Celano, Terri McFadden-Garden, Trisha Melhado
{"title":"Training residents in pediatric literacy: impact on knowledge, attitudes and practice","authors":"Ann Hazzard,&nbsp;Sharon Dabrow,&nbsp;Marianne Celano,&nbsp;Terri McFadden-Garden,&nbsp;Trisha Melhado","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00085.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Objective</b> To determine whether training in emergent literacy-building techniques increases self-reported literacy-related knowledge, attitudes, and intervention with patients.</p>\n <p><b>Design</b> Quasi-experimental; prepost with intervention and comparison groups.</p>\n <p><b>Subjects/setting</b> Pediatric resident continuity clinics in three urban locations, serving primarily low-income patients. A total of 66 residents participated.</p>\n <p><b>Intervention</b> Residents in the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 48) were scheduled to receive a half-hour training session as part of their clinic didactic series. In addition, some intervention residents were exposed to other literacy-related training such as Grand Rounds, readings, and individual modelling by a supervising physician related to specific clinic families. Residents in the comparison group (<i>n</i> = 18) received no literacy training.</p>\n <p><b>Measurement</b> A demographic questionnaire was administered at pretesting. The Knowledge About Literacy Development and Attitudes Regarding Early Childhood Literacy Scales were administered prior to training and 6 months later. The Practice Activities questionnaire was administered at post-testing only.</p>\n <p><b>Results</b> Relative to 18 comparison subjects, 48 residents in the intervention group exhibited trends toward more frequent assessment of literacy milestones and more frequent literacy-related anticipatory guidance. Specifically, the observation of modelling by a supervising physician was significantly related to an increased frequency of literacy-related assessment and anticipatory guidance and to a trend toward more positive attitudes. Intervention and comparison residents did not significantly differ overall in knowledge or attitude gains. However, literacy-facilitative attitudes were significantly correlated with frequency of literacy-related anticipatory guidance.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions/implications for practice</b> Residents had fairly high initial levels of general literacy-related knowledge</p>\n <p>and positive attitudes about providing guidance in this area to parents.</p>\n <p>Exposure to specific training in this area does appear to lead to an increased likelihood of addressing these issues in practice. Modeling by a supervising physician may be a particularly important component of training that can help residents learn how to integrate literacy assessment with overall developmental assessment and family guidance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 4","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00085.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00085.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective To determine whether training in emergent literacy-building techniques increases self-reported literacy-related knowledge, attitudes, and intervention with patients.

Design Quasi-experimental; prepost with intervention and comparison groups.

Subjects/setting Pediatric resident continuity clinics in three urban locations, serving primarily low-income patients. A total of 66 residents participated.

Intervention Residents in the intervention group (n = 48) were scheduled to receive a half-hour training session as part of their clinic didactic series. In addition, some intervention residents were exposed to other literacy-related training such as Grand Rounds, readings, and individual modelling by a supervising physician related to specific clinic families. Residents in the comparison group (n = 18) received no literacy training.

Measurement A demographic questionnaire was administered at pretesting. The Knowledge About Literacy Development and Attitudes Regarding Early Childhood Literacy Scales were administered prior to training and 6 months later. The Practice Activities questionnaire was administered at post-testing only.

Results Relative to 18 comparison subjects, 48 residents in the intervention group exhibited trends toward more frequent assessment of literacy milestones and more frequent literacy-related anticipatory guidance. Specifically, the observation of modelling by a supervising physician was significantly related to an increased frequency of literacy-related assessment and anticipatory guidance and to a trend toward more positive attitudes. Intervention and comparison residents did not significantly differ overall in knowledge or attitude gains. However, literacy-facilitative attitudes were significantly correlated with frequency of literacy-related anticipatory guidance.

Conclusions/implications for practice Residents had fairly high initial levels of general literacy-related knowledge

and positive attitudes about providing guidance in this area to parents.

Exposure to specific training in this area does appear to lead to an increased likelihood of addressing these issues in practice. Modeling by a supervising physician may be a particularly important component of training that can help residents learn how to integrate literacy assessment with overall developmental assessment and family guidance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培训住院医师儿科素养:对知识、态度和实践的影响
目的探讨紧急读写能力建设技术培训是否能提高患者自我报告的读写能力相关知识、态度和干预。准实验设计;加上干预组和对照组。在三个城市地区设置儿科住院医师连续性诊所,主要服务于低收入患者。共有66名居民参与了调查。干预组住院医师(n = 48)计划接受半小时的培训,作为其临床教学系列的一部分。此外,一些干预住院医生接受了其他与读写能力相关的培训,如大查房、阅读和由与特定诊所家庭相关的监督医生进行的个人建模。对照组(n = 18)居民未接受读写培训。测试前采用人口统计问卷。在培训前和培训后6个月分别进行读写能力发展知识和幼儿读写能力态度测试。实践活动问卷仅在测试后进行。结果干预组的48名居民表现出更频繁的识字里程碑评估和更频繁的与识字相关的预期指导的趋势。具体来说,监督医生对模型的观察与读写能力相关评估和预期指导的频率增加以及倾向于更积极的态度显著相关。干预组和比较组的居民在知识和态度上总体上没有显著差异。然而,识字促进态度与识字相关的预期指导频率显著相关。住院医师具有相当高的初步识字知识水平,并对向家长提供这方面的指导持积极态度。接受这一领域的专门培训似乎确实增加了在实践中解决这些问题的可能性。指导医生的建模可能是培训的一个特别重要的组成部分,它可以帮助住院医生学习如何将读写能力评估与整体发展评估和家庭指导结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The greatest impact of war and conflict Child, adolescent and student health monitor Social gradients in child health: why do they occur and what can paediatricians do about them? Current literature Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1