Standardizing digital forensic examination procedures: A look at Windows 10 in cases involving images depicting child sexual abuse

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY WIREs. Forensic science Pub Date : 2021-05-06 DOI:10.1002/WFS2.1417
G. Horsman
{"title":"Standardizing digital forensic examination procedures: A look at Windows 10 in cases involving images depicting child sexual abuse","authors":"G. Horsman","doi":"10.1002/WFS2.1417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a topic area, the need for the standardization of operational practices in digital forensics has seen much discussion. There are clear benefits for digital forensics if its procedures can be harmonized including increasing the reliability of the work produced by its practitioners, consistency of practice, and the potential for greater quality control, however, attaining standardization is a difficult task, and further work in this field is required. This work discusses the “ standardization challenge ” assessing both the need for standardization and the feasibility of achieving it. It is suggested that those actively contributing in this area should consider the development of models for defining operational practice which are offence-specific , device-specific and operating system-specific . To support this proposal, an example standard is offered and discussed which suggests and documents the minimum expected requirements for the examination of Windows 10 devices in cases involving images depicting child sexual abuse. This article is categorized under:","PeriodicalId":75325,"journal":{"name":"WIREs. Forensic science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs. Forensic science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/WFS2.1417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a topic area, the need for the standardization of operational practices in digital forensics has seen much discussion. There are clear benefits for digital forensics if its procedures can be harmonized including increasing the reliability of the work produced by its practitioners, consistency of practice, and the potential for greater quality control, however, attaining standardization is a difficult task, and further work in this field is required. This work discusses the “ standardization challenge ” assessing both the need for standardization and the feasibility of achieving it. It is suggested that those actively contributing in this area should consider the development of models for defining operational practice which are offence-specific , device-specific and operating system-specific . To support this proposal, an example standard is offered and discussed which suggests and documents the minimum expected requirements for the examination of Windows 10 devices in cases involving images depicting child sexual abuse. This article is categorized under:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化数字法医检查程序:看看Windows 10在涉及儿童性虐待图像的案件中的应用
作为一个主题领域,对数字取证操作实践标准化的需求已经引起了很多讨论。如果能够协调数字取证的程序,包括提高从业人员所做工作的可靠性、实践的一致性和更好的质量控制的潜力,那么数字取证的好处是显而易见的,然而,实现标准化是一项艰巨的任务,需要在这一领域开展进一步的工作。这项工作讨论了“标准化挑战”,评估了标准化的需要和实现它的可行性。建议在这一领域积极作出贡献的人应考虑发展模型,以定义针对特定攻击、特定设备和特定操作系统的操作实践。为了支持这一建议,本文提供并讨论了一个示例标准,该标准建议并记录了在涉及儿童性虐待图像的情况下对Windows 10设备进行检查的最低预期要求。本文分类如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The prevalence, risks, and detection of driving under the influence of nitrous oxide Chlorate‐based homemade explosives: A review The importance of digital evidence strategies The metaverse—Not a new frontier for crime “Noble cause casuistry” in forensic genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1