SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS: EVOLUTION BEYOND BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS

IF 0.7 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Journal of Green Building Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.3992/jgb.17.4.199
U. Weerasinghe
{"title":"SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS: EVOLUTION BEYOND BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS","authors":"U. Weerasinghe","doi":"10.3992/jgb.17.4.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The publication of the Brundtland Commission Report, popularly known as Our Common Future, was the precursor for what was to follow in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development or the Earth Summit. Both these events played a fundamental role in the global initiatives towards sustainability. The adoption of Agenda 21, a blueprint for sustainable development for the 21st century was a crucial agreement of the Rio Summit, which marked the beginning of an era where the term Sustainable Development came to be associated with all human interventions on planet earth.\n In this context, the building industry, which makes a significant impact on the social, environmental and economic well-being of the society, has a prime responsibility in meeting with sustainability requirements in all facets of the design, construction and operation of buildings. Currently efforts are being made by the building industry and the allied professions to adhere to sustainability norms by enhancing the current green building practices. The emergence of building environmental assessment (BEA) methods is such an attempt in addressing these issues, but is considered as insufficient to contend with the wider spectrum of sustainability.\n A technique to address complex attributes of sustainable performance of building projects has not been attempted before, owing to the dynamic nature of the concept of sustainability. This paper attempts to develop a framework to enhance current BEA methods, as the next stage of development towards meeting global sustainability initiatives. The main objective is to evolve a set of indicators that will assist in determining sustainability of a building. Three widely used BEA methods and Agenda 21, are analyzed, along with a focus group, to derive sustainability indicators. A total of 62 indicators under 10 categories are identified, some of which are common to BEA methods, while several new indicators are introduced to address sustainability issues not previously accounted for in BEA methods. The final outcome is a framework that can be used to determine the extent of sustainability of building projects.\n With the aid of the proposed framework of indicators, it is possible to develop a complete sustainability index by allocating values to each indicator, through a survey of professionals in the building industry. Such an index could be used as a tool in developing sustainable buildings, thus meeting with aspirations of building design teams and clientele who seek high quality sustainable solutions for their endeavours. This effort would also pave way for further research into the domain of building sustainability.","PeriodicalId":51753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Green Building","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Green Building","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.17.4.199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The publication of the Brundtland Commission Report, popularly known as Our Common Future, was the precursor for what was to follow in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development or the Earth Summit. Both these events played a fundamental role in the global initiatives towards sustainability. The adoption of Agenda 21, a blueprint for sustainable development for the 21st century was a crucial agreement of the Rio Summit, which marked the beginning of an era where the term Sustainable Development came to be associated with all human interventions on planet earth. In this context, the building industry, which makes a significant impact on the social, environmental and economic well-being of the society, has a prime responsibility in meeting with sustainability requirements in all facets of the design, construction and operation of buildings. Currently efforts are being made by the building industry and the allied professions to adhere to sustainability norms by enhancing the current green building practices. The emergence of building environmental assessment (BEA) methods is such an attempt in addressing these issues, but is considered as insufficient to contend with the wider spectrum of sustainability. A technique to address complex attributes of sustainable performance of building projects has not been attempted before, owing to the dynamic nature of the concept of sustainability. This paper attempts to develop a framework to enhance current BEA methods, as the next stage of development towards meeting global sustainability initiatives. The main objective is to evolve a set of indicators that will assist in determining sustainability of a building. Three widely used BEA methods and Agenda 21, are analyzed, along with a focus group, to derive sustainability indicators. A total of 62 indicators under 10 categories are identified, some of which are common to BEA methods, while several new indicators are introduced to address sustainability issues not previously accounted for in BEA methods. The final outcome is a framework that can be used to determine the extent of sustainability of building projects. With the aid of the proposed framework of indicators, it is possible to develop a complete sustainability index by allocating values to each indicator, through a survey of professionals in the building industry. Such an index could be used as a tool in developing sustainable buildings, thus meeting with aspirations of building design teams and clientele who seek high quality sustainable solutions for their endeavours. This effort would also pave way for further research into the domain of building sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续建筑:超越建筑环境评价方法的进化
《布伦特兰委员会报告》,通俗地称为《我们共同的未来》,是1992年在里约热内卢举行的联合国环境与发展会议或地球首脑会议的前身。这两项活动都对可持续发展的全球倡议发挥了根本作用。21世纪可持续发展蓝图《21世纪议程》的通过是联合国首脑会议达成的一项重要协议,标志着可持续发展一词与地球上所有人类干预活动联系在一起的新时代的开始。在这种背景下,对社会、环境和经济福祉产生重大影响的建筑行业,在满足建筑设计、建造和运营各个方面的可持续性要求方面负有主要责任。目前,建筑行业和相关专业正在努力通过加强现行的绿色建筑实践来遵守可持续发展规范。建筑环境评价(BEA)方法的出现就是解决这些问题的一种尝试,但被认为不足以应付更广泛的可持续性。由于可持续性概念的动态性质,以前从未尝试过处理建筑项目可持续绩效的复杂属性的技术。本文试图建立一个框架来加强当前的BEA方法,作为满足全球可持续发展倡议的下一个发展阶段。主要目标是制定一套有助于确定建筑物可持续性的指标。与焦点小组一起分析了三种广泛使用的经济分析方法和《21世纪议程》,以得出可持续性指标。共确定了10个类别下的62个指标,其中一些是经济分析方法所共有的,同时采用了一些新的指标来处理经济分析方法以前没有考虑到的可持续性问题。最终的结果是一个框架,可以用来确定建筑项目的可持续性程度。在建议的指标框架的帮助下,可以通过对建筑行业专业人员的调查,通过分配每个指标的值来制定一个完整的可持续性指数。该指数可作为发展可持续建筑的工具,从而满足建筑设计团队和客户寻求高质量可持续解决方案的愿望。这一努力也将为建筑可持续性领域的进一步研究铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Green Building is to present the very best peer-reviewed research in green building design, construction, engineering, technological innovation, facilities management, building information modeling, and community and urban planning. The Research section of the Journal of Green Building publishes peer-reviewed articles in the fields of engineering, architecture, construction, construction management, building science, facilities management, landscape architecture, interior design, urban and community planning, and all disciplines related to the built environment. In addition, the Journal of Green Building offers the following sections: Industry Corner that offers applied articles of successfully completed sustainable buildings and landscapes; New Directions in Teaching and Research that offers guidance from teachers and researchers on incorporating innovative sustainable learning into the curriculum or the likely directions of future research; and Campus Sustainability that offers articles from programs dedicated to greening the university campus.
期刊最新文献
STUDENTS’ AWARENESS, EXPECTATIONS, AND PERCEPTIONS ABOUT SUSTAINABILITY: A CASE STUDY IN AN ORDINARY UNIVERSITY IN CHINA EXPLORING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF WELL-CERTIFIED K-12 SCHOOLS: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON INTERNATIONAL CASES DURABILITY BEHAVIOR OF BANANA FIBER-REINFORCED NATURAL POZZOLAN GEOPOLYMER ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR GREEN BUILDING BY USING A SEMI-AUTOMATIC METHOD A STUDY ON THE EVALUATION METHODS OF INDOOR LIGHT ENVIRONMENT FOR OCCUPANT COMFORT AND WELL-BEING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1