{"title":"Sedimentological and ecological significance of a biodeformational structure associated with an unusual feeding behavior in gulls (Larus sp.)","authors":"S. Melnyk, Cody N. Lazowski, M. Gingras","doi":"10.1080/10420940.2022.2067535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Shorebirds produce a range of biogenic sedimentary structures related to their feeding behaviors, the most common of which are probing behaviors that result in morphologically simple impressions or indentations on the surface of a sedimentary substrate. Here we describe an unusual biodeformational structure made by a feeding gull (Larus sp.) produced as the tracemaker kneaded the sediment by moving its feet back and forth in place. This process liquified the sediment making it easier to catch invertebrate prey — the most common of which is the varnish clam (Nuttallia obscurata) — that are advected to the top of the liquified sediment. The bird retreated slowly backward as the sediment was liquified, an effort that is interpreted to represent continued and ongoing feeding in the sediment of prey-rich substrates. The resulting structure comprises a series of nested, concavo-convex sediment mounds and a terminal bowl-shaped impression. The aim of this paper is to document the trace–tracemaker association and provide a means of comparison with similar structures. Most notably, the structure bears similarities to Piscichnus, which represents ray feeding traces produced by hydraulic jetting (fodichnia) or nesting behaviors (calichnia) in fish. Piscichnus, however, lacks the nested mounds that result from the tracemaker systematically moving backward as it searches for food.","PeriodicalId":51057,"journal":{"name":"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces","volume":"49 1","pages":"84 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2022.2067535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Shorebirds produce a range of biogenic sedimentary structures related to their feeding behaviors, the most common of which are probing behaviors that result in morphologically simple impressions or indentations on the surface of a sedimentary substrate. Here we describe an unusual biodeformational structure made by a feeding gull (Larus sp.) produced as the tracemaker kneaded the sediment by moving its feet back and forth in place. This process liquified the sediment making it easier to catch invertebrate prey — the most common of which is the varnish clam (Nuttallia obscurata) — that are advected to the top of the liquified sediment. The bird retreated slowly backward as the sediment was liquified, an effort that is interpreted to represent continued and ongoing feeding in the sediment of prey-rich substrates. The resulting structure comprises a series of nested, concavo-convex sediment mounds and a terminal bowl-shaped impression. The aim of this paper is to document the trace–tracemaker association and provide a means of comparison with similar structures. Most notably, the structure bears similarities to Piscichnus, which represents ray feeding traces produced by hydraulic jetting (fodichnia) or nesting behaviors (calichnia) in fish. Piscichnus, however, lacks the nested mounds that result from the tracemaker systematically moving backward as it searches for food.
期刊介绍:
The foremost aim of Ichnos is to promote excellence in ichnologic research. Primary emphases center upon the ethologic and ecologic significance of tracemaking organisms; organism-substrate interrelationships; and the role of biogenic processes in environmental reconstruction, sediment dynamics, sequence or event stratigraphy, biogeochemistry, and sedimentary diagenesis. Each contribution rests upon a firm taxonomic foundation, although papers dealing solely with systematics and nomenclature may have less priority than those dealing with conceptual and interpretive aspects of ichnology. Contributions from biologists and geologists are equally welcome.
The format for Ichnos is designed to accommodate several types of manuscripts, including Research Articles (comprehensive articles dealing with original, fundamental research in ichnology), and Short Communications (short, succinct papers treating certain aspects of the history of ichnology, book reviews, news and notes, or invited comments dealing with current or contentious issues). The large page size and two-column format lend flexibility to the design of tables and illustrations. Thorough but timely reviews and rapid publication of manuscripts are integral parts of the process.