Visual Attention to Tobacco-Related Stimuli in a 3D Virtual Store

L. Dutra, J. Nonnemaker, Nathaniel Taylor, Ashley L. Feld, B. Bradfield, John W. Holloway, Edward Hill, Annice E Kim
{"title":"Visual Attention to Tobacco-Related Stimuli in a 3D Virtual Store","authors":"L. Dutra, J. Nonnemaker, Nathaniel Taylor, Ashley L. Feld, B. Bradfield, John W. Holloway, Edward Hill, Annice E Kim","doi":"10.3768/rtipress.2020.rr.0036.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used eye tracking to measure visual attention to tobacco products and pro- and anti-tobacco advertisements (pro-ads and anti-ads) during a shopping task in a three-dimensional virtual convenience store. We used eye-tracking hardware to track the percentage of fixations (number of times the eye was essentially stationary; F) and dwell time (time spent looking at an object; DT) for several categories of objects and ads for 30 adult current cigarette smokers. We used Wald F-tests to compare fixations and dwell time across categories, adjusting comparisons of ads by the number of each type of ad. Overall, unadjusted for the number of each object, participants focused significantly greater attention on snacks and drinks and tobacco products than ads (all P<0.005). Adjusting for the number of each type of ad viewed, participants devoted significantly greater visual attention to pro-ads than anti-ads or ads unrelated to tobacco (P<0.001). Visual attention for anti-ads was significantly greater when the ads were placed on the store’s external walls or hung from the ceiling than when placed on the gas pump or floor (P<0.005). In a cluttered convenience store environment, anti-ads at the point of sale have to compete with many other stimuli. Restrictions on tobacco product displays and advertisements at the point of sale could reduce the stimuli that attract smokers’ attention away from anti-ads.","PeriodicalId":88935,"journal":{"name":"Methods report (RTI Press)","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods report (RTI Press)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2020.rr.0036.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used eye tracking to measure visual attention to tobacco products and pro- and anti-tobacco advertisements (pro-ads and anti-ads) during a shopping task in a three-dimensional virtual convenience store. We used eye-tracking hardware to track the percentage of fixations (number of times the eye was essentially stationary; F) and dwell time (time spent looking at an object; DT) for several categories of objects and ads for 30 adult current cigarette smokers. We used Wald F-tests to compare fixations and dwell time across categories, adjusting comparisons of ads by the number of each type of ad. Overall, unadjusted for the number of each object, participants focused significantly greater attention on snacks and drinks and tobacco products than ads (all P<0.005). Adjusting for the number of each type of ad viewed, participants devoted significantly greater visual attention to pro-ads than anti-ads or ads unrelated to tobacco (P<0.001). Visual attention for anti-ads was significantly greater when the ads were placed on the store’s external walls or hung from the ceiling than when placed on the gas pump or floor (P<0.005). In a cluttered convenience store environment, anti-ads at the point of sale have to compete with many other stimuli. Restrictions on tobacco product displays and advertisements at the point of sale could reduce the stimuli that attract smokers’ attention away from anti-ads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维虚拟商店中烟草相关刺激的视觉注意
我们使用眼动追踪技术测量了在三维虚拟便利店购物过程中人们对烟草产品以及支持和反对烟草广告(支持广告和反对广告)的视觉注意力。我们使用眼动追踪硬件来追踪注视的百分比(眼睛基本静止的次数;F)和停留时间(注视一个物体的时间;(DT)为几类物品和30名成年吸烟者的广告。我们使用Wald f检验来比较不同类别的固定时间和停留时间,并根据每种类型广告的数量调整广告的比较。总的来说,不考虑每个物品的数量,参与者对零食、饮料和烟草产品的注意力明显高于广告(均P<0.005)。调整每种类型广告的观看次数后,参与者对支持广告的视觉注意力明显高于反对广告或与烟草无关的广告(P<0.001)。当广告放置在商店的外墙或悬挂在天花板上时,反广告的视觉注意力明显高于放置在加油站或地板上(P<0.005)。在杂乱的便利商店环境中,销售点的反广告必须与许多其他刺激物竞争。在销售点限制烟草产品的展示和广告,可以减少把吸烟者的注意力从反广告上吸引过来的刺激物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Attention to Tobacco-Related Stimuli in a 3D Virtual Store Interactive visualization to facilitate monitoring longitudinal survey data and paradata Implications of Alternative Land Conversion Cost Specifications on Projected Afforestation Potential in the United States. A Control Theory Model of Smoking. Visualization of Categorical Longitudinal and Times Series Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1