Performance Optimization of Ti-6Al-4V Milling Process Using Sustainable Cooling Approach and Application of Rao Algorithms

IF 2.2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s11665-023-08672-0
Yogesh V. Deshpande, T. A. Madankar, Dhriti Khatri, Maseera Sayyed
{"title":"Performance Optimization of Ti-6Al-4V Milling Process Using Sustainable Cooling Approach and Application of Rao Algorithms","authors":"Yogesh V. Deshpande,&nbsp;T. A. Madankar,&nbsp;Dhriti Khatri,&nbsp;Maseera Sayyed","doi":"10.1007/s11665-023-08672-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Titanium alloy is the most promising superalloy widely used in avionics systems, because of its high strength and great corrosion resistance. Machining efficiency of this alloy can be enhanced with modeling and optimization approaches. In the present work, modeling of response surface methodology is used for milling of Ti-6Al-4V using no-coolant (dry), minimum amount coolant (MAC), and use of liquid carbon dioxide as cryogen with spray of nitrogen gas besides minimum amount of biodegradable mixture (Hybrid). Cutting speed (<i>v</i>), feed rate (<i>f</i>), and depth of cut (<i>d</i>) are input parameters, whereas temperature, tool wear, surface finish, and material removal rate are responses. GA, JAYA, and Rao1, 2, and 3 algorithms were used to solve a multi-objective function (Z). For hybrid condition compared to no-coolant and MAC, 35 and 17% reduction in T, 32 and 21% reduction in <i>V</i><sub>f</sub>, 45 and 33% reduction in <i>R</i><sub>a,</sub> and 45 and 15% improvement in MRR, respectively, was observed. JAYA performed 91, 64, 62, and 57% better than GA, Rao-1, Rao-2, and Rao-3 algorithms, respectively, for MAC condition. It has been observed that JAYA algorithm is better at achieving steady state and requires less generations, whereas Rao algorithms run faster. From the computational tests, it is observed that the performance of the Rao algorithm is superior to the other optimization algorithms. In terms of execution time, Rao-1 performed 49, 74, and 42% better than Rao-3, whereas 60, 77, and 41% better when compared to Rao-2 for three milling conditions, respectively.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","volume":"33 19","pages":"10201 - 10215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-023-08672-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Titanium alloy is the most promising superalloy widely used in avionics systems, because of its high strength and great corrosion resistance. Machining efficiency of this alloy can be enhanced with modeling and optimization approaches. In the present work, modeling of response surface methodology is used for milling of Ti-6Al-4V using no-coolant (dry), minimum amount coolant (MAC), and use of liquid carbon dioxide as cryogen with spray of nitrogen gas besides minimum amount of biodegradable mixture (Hybrid). Cutting speed (v), feed rate (f), and depth of cut (d) are input parameters, whereas temperature, tool wear, surface finish, and material removal rate are responses. GA, JAYA, and Rao1, 2, and 3 algorithms were used to solve a multi-objective function (Z). For hybrid condition compared to no-coolant and MAC, 35 and 17% reduction in T, 32 and 21% reduction in Vf, 45 and 33% reduction in Ra, and 45 and 15% improvement in MRR, respectively, was observed. JAYA performed 91, 64, 62, and 57% better than GA, Rao-1, Rao-2, and Rao-3 algorithms, respectively, for MAC condition. It has been observed that JAYA algorithm is better at achieving steady state and requires less generations, whereas Rao algorithms run faster. From the computational tests, it is observed that the performance of the Rao algorithm is superior to the other optimization algorithms. In terms of execution time, Rao-1 performed 49, 74, and 42% better than Rao-3, whereas 60, 77, and 41% better when compared to Rao-2 for three milling conditions, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用可持续冷却方法和 Rao 算法优化 Ti-6Al-4V 铣削工艺的性能
钛合金具有高强度和耐腐蚀性,是航空电子系统中最有前途的超级合金。通过建模和优化方法可以提高这种合金的加工效率。本研究采用响应面方法建模,使用无冷却剂(干式)、最小量冷却剂(MAC)、液态二氧化碳作为低温剂并喷洒氮气以及最小量生物降解混合物(混合式)对 Ti-6Al-4V 进行铣削。切削速度 (v)、进给量 (f) 和切削深度 (d) 是输入参数,而温度、刀具磨损、表面光洁度和材料去除率则是响应参数。采用 GA、JAYA 和 Rao1、2、3 算法求解多目标函数 (Z)。在混合工况下,与无冷却剂和 MAC 相比,T 分别降低了 35%和 17%,Vf 分别降低了 32%和 21%,Ra 分别降低了 45%和 33%,MRR 分别提高了 45%和 15%。在 MAC 条件下,JAYA 的性能分别比 GA、Rao-1、Rao-2 和 Rao-3 算法好 91%、64%、62% 和 57%。据观察,JAYA 算法在实现稳定状态方面表现更好,所需的代数也更少,而 Rao 算法则运行得更快。从计算测试中可以看出,Rao 算法的性能优于其他优化算法。就执行时间而言,在三种铣削条件下,Rao-1 的性能分别比 Rao-3 好 49%、74% 和 42%,而 Rao-2 则分别比 Rao-1 好 60%、77% 和 41%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1120
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: ASM International''s Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance focuses on solving day-to-day engineering challenges, particularly those involving components for larger systems. The journal presents a clear understanding of relationships between materials selection, processing, applications and performance. The Journal of Materials Engineering covers all aspects of materials selection, design, processing, characterization and evaluation, including how to improve materials properties through processes and process control of casting, forming, heat treating, surface modification and coating, and fabrication. Testing and characterization (including mechanical and physical tests, NDE, metallography, failure analysis, corrosion resistance, chemical analysis, surface characterization, and microanalysis of surfaces, features and fractures), and industrial performance measurement are also covered
期刊最新文献
Effects of Retrogression and Re-aging (RRA) Processes on Corrosion Properties in AA 7020 Aluminium Alloy Synergistic Effect of Ex Situ and In Situ Reinforcements on the Dry Reciprocating Wear Behavior of AA6061-B4C Composite Fabricated Using Varying K2TiF6 Flux Content Effects of Ga Content on Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Response of Heterostructured Dual-Phase Ag-49Cu Alloys Effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the Mechanical Properties and Defect Tolerance of Selective-Laser-Melted 316L Stainless Steel Mechanical and Metallurgical Properties of Foam Developed by Friction Stir Tube Deposition Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1