Molecular and serological studies of Egyptian strains of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus and their comparison with vaccine strains.

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.20506/rst.39.3.3195
Dalia A. M. Abd El-Moaty, S.E.A. ABO-DALAL, O. Salman, N. ABDEL-WANEES, A. M. Abbas
{"title":"Molecular and serological studies of Egyptian strains of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus and their comparison with vaccine strains.","authors":"Dalia A. M. Abd El-Moaty, S.E.A. ABO-DALAL, O. Salman, N. ABDEL-WANEES, A. M. Abbas","doi":"10.20506/rst.39.3.3195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination is the major control measure for rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). The co-circulation of different RHDV genotypes in Egypt has led to the need to determine the most effective vaccine strain and the cross-protection between these genotypes. Rabbits seronegative for RHDV were vaccinated with the commercial GI.1a (RHDVa) vaccine strain Giza2006 and the GI.1d (G5) vaccine strain Giza97. The rabbits were challenged three weeks post vaccination with GI.1a (RHDVa) strains Giza2010 and Kal2012 and GI.1d (G5) RHDV Giza97 and RHDV2014 to determine the degree of cross-protection and evaluate immunity and cross-reactivity by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). Both vaccines were fully protective three weeks post vaccination, with 95% protection for the GI.1a vaccine and 94.7% for the GI.1d vaccine, with no direct relationship between mortality rates and the genotype of the challenge strain. The antibody titres obtained using the HI test were one log higher for the GI.1a compared with the GI.1d vaccine, but post-challenge titres showed increased responses, expressed as 1?3 log2 higher titres, for the GI.1d vaccine. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the Egyptian strain RHDV2014 revealed its relatedness to the GI.1d genotype and showed no evidence of the presence of GI.2 in Egypt until 2014. In conclusion, both GI.1d (G5) and GI.1a (RHDVa)-based vaccines are protective against both RHDV genotypes present in Egypt but continuous monitoring of circulating strains is essential because the arrival of GI.2 in Egypt will require new vaccination strategies.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"215 1","pages":"1039-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.3.3195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Vaccination is the major control measure for rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). The co-circulation of different RHDV genotypes in Egypt has led to the need to determine the most effective vaccine strain and the cross-protection between these genotypes. Rabbits seronegative for RHDV were vaccinated with the commercial GI.1a (RHDVa) vaccine strain Giza2006 and the GI.1d (G5) vaccine strain Giza97. The rabbits were challenged three weeks post vaccination with GI.1a (RHDVa) strains Giza2010 and Kal2012 and GI.1d (G5) RHDV Giza97 and RHDV2014 to determine the degree of cross-protection and evaluate immunity and cross-reactivity by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). Both vaccines were fully protective three weeks post vaccination, with 95% protection for the GI.1a vaccine and 94.7% for the GI.1d vaccine, with no direct relationship between mortality rates and the genotype of the challenge strain. The antibody titres obtained using the HI test were one log higher for the GI.1a compared with the GI.1d vaccine, but post-challenge titres showed increased responses, expressed as 1?3 log2 higher titres, for the GI.1d vaccine. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the Egyptian strain RHDV2014 revealed its relatedness to the GI.1d genotype and showed no evidence of the presence of GI.2 in Egypt until 2014. In conclusion, both GI.1d (G5) and GI.1a (RHDVa)-based vaccines are protective against both RHDV genotypes present in Egypt but continuous monitoring of circulating strains is essential because the arrival of GI.2 in Egypt will require new vaccination strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兔出血性疾病病毒埃及株的分子和血清学研究及其与疫苗株的比较。
疫苗接种是兔出血性疾病病毒(RHDV)的主要控制措施。埃及不同RHDV基因型的共循环导致需要确定最有效的疫苗株和这些基因型之间的交叉保护。兔rhdvv血清阴性接种GI.1a (RHDVa)商业疫苗株Giza2006和GI.1d (G5)疫苗株Giza97。接种3周后,兔分别接种GI.1a (RHDVa)菌株Giza2010和Kal2012以及GI.1d (G5) RHDV Giza97和RHDV2014,通过血凝抑制(HI)和间接酶联免疫吸附试验(iELISA)测定交叉保护程度,评估免疫和交叉反应性。两种疫苗在接种后三周均具有完全保护作用,GI.1a疫苗的保护作用为95%,GI.1d疫苗的保护作用为94.7%,死亡率与攻毒菌株的基因型之间没有直接关系。与GI.1d疫苗相比,使用HI试验获得的GI.1a抗体滴度高1个对数,但攻毒后滴度显示出增加的应答,表示为1?GI.1d疫苗的滴度提高了3倍。埃及菌株RHDV2014的序列和系统发育分析显示其与GI.1d基因型有亲缘关系,直到2014年埃及才有GI.2基因型存在的证据。总之,基于GI.1d (G5)和GI.1a (RHDVa)的疫苗对埃及存在的两种RHDV基因型都具有保护作用,但持续监测流行毒株至关重要,因为GI.2抵达埃及将需要新的疫苗接种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
期刊最新文献
Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: a century of progress and the future. Rinderpest and peste des petits ruminants: state of play in disease eradication efforts. The science of animal welfare in the One Health-One Welfare agenda: local solutions for global challenges. Shifting from wildlife disease threats to wildlife health. Strategic challenges in the global control of high pathogenicity avian influenza.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1