Evaluating the use of patient pathway scores in medical assessments.

Sarah A. Rothery, H. Green, C. Hale
{"title":"Evaluating the use of patient pathway scores in medical assessments.","authors":"Sarah A. Rothery, H. Green, C. Hale","doi":"10.7748/en.2017.e1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim This article describes the modification and testing of a triage tool, the patient pathway assessment score (PPAS), which could be used by all grades of nursing staff to triage patients in a medical assessment area (MAA). The aim was to increase patient satisfaction and reduce waiting times. Method Staff scored all patients using PPAS, but used the existing triage process to assign patients to one of the MAA's two pathways. Two researchers reviewed patients' notes retrospectively to determine which pathway they should have followed and compared this to the outcome that would have occurred if the PPAS score had been used. Results Full, rather than theoretical, use of the PPAS tool could have reduced patient waiting times, as 55 (24%) out of 231 patients would have been allocated to the correct pathway. Conclusion The tool could improve patients' journeys through the MAA by ensuring they are allocated to the correct pathway. It is now implemented in practice.","PeriodicalId":94315,"journal":{"name":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","volume":"10 1","pages":"27-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2017.e1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim This article describes the modification and testing of a triage tool, the patient pathway assessment score (PPAS), which could be used by all grades of nursing staff to triage patients in a medical assessment area (MAA). The aim was to increase patient satisfaction and reduce waiting times. Method Staff scored all patients using PPAS, but used the existing triage process to assign patients to one of the MAA's two pathways. Two researchers reviewed patients' notes retrospectively to determine which pathway they should have followed and compared this to the outcome that would have occurred if the PPAS score had been used. Results Full, rather than theoretical, use of the PPAS tool could have reduced patient waiting times, as 55 (24%) out of 231 patients would have been allocated to the correct pathway. Conclusion The tool could improve patients' journeys through the MAA by ensuring they are allocated to the correct pathway. It is now implemented in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估患者路径评分在医学评估中的应用。
目的本文介绍了一种分诊工具——患者路径评估评分(PPAS)的改进和测试,该工具可被各级护理人员用于医学评估区(MAA)的患者分诊。其目的是提高患者满意度,减少等待时间。方法:工作人员使用PPAS对所有患者进行评分,但使用现有的分诊流程将患者分配到MAA的两种途径之一。两名研究人员回顾了患者的记录,以确定他们应该遵循的途径,并将其与使用PPAS评分可能发生的结果进行比较。结果:全面而非理论上使用PPAS工具可以减少患者的等待时间,因为231名患者中有55名(24%)将被分配到正确的途径。结论该工具通过确保患者被分配到正确的路径,可以改善患者通过MAA的旅程。目前已在实践中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding non-traumatic dental presentations to emergency and urgent care: a critically appraised topic. The power of nursing triage notes: alcohol and substance use challenges in frequent attenders to rural emergency departments. Redesigning the first point of contact for walk-in patients in the emergency department: a service evaluation of the First Encounter model. Maximising learning from patient safety incidents in emergency care. Addressing the mental health crisis by enhancing paramedics' training in Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1