Pathways to Increasing Trust in Public Health Data

C. Augustin, I. Holeman, E. Salomon, H. Olsen, Phillip Azar, M. Ayyangar
{"title":"Pathways to Increasing Trust in Public Health Data","authors":"C. Augustin, I. Holeman, E. Salomon, H. Olsen, Phillip Azar, M. Ayyangar","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2021.1979808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Digital tools make it easier to collect data about patients closer to where they live, understand their health needs better, and treat them faster, thereby saving lives. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are increasingly collecting digital data through the course of care delivery. However, despite the widespread championing of digital health tools, the full impact of these technologies has not been realized because CHW-collected data is often considered low quality and unreliable for data-driven decision-making. At a systemic level, mistrust in the quality of the data (a lack of so-called ‘data trust’) limits the potential impact. The primary objective of this research program was to identify inconsistent or problematic data (IoP) occurring across a digitally enabled CHW health system in order to recommend changes in digital health tools and processes that might increase trust in CHW-collected data. In this exploratory study, data were analyzed using a variety of statistical and data science approaches including clustering algorithms, histograms, box plots, and Sankey diagrams. IoP were identified from a suite of 160 tests internally developed to identify IoP at the health platform level. As anticipated, data exhibited issues with accuracy, completeness, and timeliness across digital health forms. While each IoP issue identified could be individually remediated, recommendations provided are centered on a platform-wide (and tool agnostic) approach to data quality in community health.","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"45 1","pages":"24 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2021.1979808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Digital tools make it easier to collect data about patients closer to where they live, understand their health needs better, and treat them faster, thereby saving lives. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are increasingly collecting digital data through the course of care delivery. However, despite the widespread championing of digital health tools, the full impact of these technologies has not been realized because CHW-collected data is often considered low quality and unreliable for data-driven decision-making. At a systemic level, mistrust in the quality of the data (a lack of so-called ‘data trust’) limits the potential impact. The primary objective of this research program was to identify inconsistent or problematic data (IoP) occurring across a digitally enabled CHW health system in order to recommend changes in digital health tools and processes that might increase trust in CHW-collected data. In this exploratory study, data were analyzed using a variety of statistical and data science approaches including clustering algorithms, histograms, box plots, and Sankey diagrams. IoP were identified from a suite of 160 tests internally developed to identify IoP at the health platform level. As anticipated, data exhibited issues with accuracy, completeness, and timeliness across digital health forms. While each IoP issue identified could be individually remediated, recommendations provided are centered on a platform-wide (and tool agnostic) approach to data quality in community health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加对公共卫生数据信任的途径
数字工具可以更容易地收集患者的数据,更好地了解他们的健康需求,更快地对他们进行治疗,从而挽救生命。社区卫生工作者(CHWs)越来越多地通过提供护理过程收集数字数据。然而,尽管数字卫生工具得到了广泛的支持,但这些技术的全部影响尚未实现,因为卫生保健中心收集的数据通常被认为质量低且不可靠,无法用于数据驱动的决策。在系统层面上,对数据质量的不信任(缺乏所谓的“数据信任”)限制了潜在的影响。本研究项目的主要目的是识别数字化卫生保健系统中出现的不一致或有问题的数据(IoP),以便建议改变数字卫生工具和流程,从而增加对卫生保健收集数据的信任。在这项探索性研究中,使用各种统计和数据科学方法分析数据,包括聚类算法、直方图、箱形图和桑基图。IoP是从内部开发的一套160个测试中确定的,该测试旨在确定健康平台级别的IoP。正如预期的那样,数字健康表格中的数据在准确性、完整性和及时性方面存在问题。虽然所确定的每一个IoP问题都可以单独加以补救,但所提供的建议集中在对社区卫生数据质量采取全平台(与工具无关)的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple discoveries in causal inference: LATE for the party. Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R Three Welcome Arrivals for 2023: 1. Florence Nightingale Bayesian Probability for Babies Fresh Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1