ADAPTING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION FOR THE AI ERA: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Chih-Wen Lan
{"title":"ADAPTING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION FOR THE AI ERA: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS","authors":"Chih-Wen Lan","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Architectural design courses are an essential part of many universities' curricula, offering students the opportunity to learn about building construction, building physics, mechanics, environmental ecology, and architectural aesthetics. Traditional architectural training typically starts with architectural graphics and model making by hand, which helps students understand the relationship between human scale and space scale and develops their aesthetic taste and innovative thinking. However, the rise of advanced technologies and AI products in recent years has led to a decline in students' interest in practical training. Some students prefer to use online searches to understand room size rather than taking measurements, and they would rather learn how to use 3D printers than how to make models with utility knives. This trend has prompted questions about the relevance of traditional architectural training methods to the new generation of students. Should educators abandon traditional training and adopt new technologies? This research examines traditional architectural training methods through personal teaching experience in universities, using first-stage AI skills to compare traditional methods and adjusted methods. The study seeks to determine the adaptability of traditional training methods to face AI trends while maintaining the relevance of human scale and space scale, aesthetic taste, and innovative thinking. The findings of this research offer insights into how educators can adjust their teaching methods to provide students with the necessary skills to succeed in the current and future technological environment. The study also offers discussions and possible solutions to address the challenges faced by architectural educators for future generations.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Architectural design courses are an essential part of many universities' curricula, offering students the opportunity to learn about building construction, building physics, mechanics, environmental ecology, and architectural aesthetics. Traditional architectural training typically starts with architectural graphics and model making by hand, which helps students understand the relationship between human scale and space scale and develops their aesthetic taste and innovative thinking. However, the rise of advanced technologies and AI products in recent years has led to a decline in students' interest in practical training. Some students prefer to use online searches to understand room size rather than taking measurements, and they would rather learn how to use 3D printers than how to make models with utility knives. This trend has prompted questions about the relevance of traditional architectural training methods to the new generation of students. Should educators abandon traditional training and adopt new technologies? This research examines traditional architectural training methods through personal teaching experience in universities, using first-stage AI skills to compare traditional methods and adjusted methods. The study seeks to determine the adaptability of traditional training methods to face AI trends while maintaining the relevance of human scale and space scale, aesthetic taste, and innovative thinking. The findings of this research offer insights into how educators can adjust their teaching methods to provide students with the necessary skills to succeed in the current and future technological environment. The study also offers discussions and possible solutions to address the challenges faced by architectural educators for future generations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应人工智能时代的建筑设计教育:初步发现和未来方向
建筑设计课程是许多大学课程的重要组成部分,为学生提供了学习建筑施工、建筑物理、力学、环境生态学和建筑美学的机会。传统的建筑训练通常从手绘建筑图形和模型制作开始,帮助学生理解人的尺度和空间尺度的关系,培养他们的审美情趣和创新思维。然而,近年来先进技术和人工智能产品的兴起导致学生对实践培训的兴趣下降。一些学生更喜欢通过在线搜索来了解房间大小,而不是测量,他们更愿意学习如何使用3D打印机,而不是如何用美工刀制作模型。这一趋势引发了人们对传统建筑培训方法与新一代学生的相关性的质疑。教育工作者是否应该放弃传统的培训而采用新技术?本研究通过个人在大学的教学经验来检验传统的建筑培训方法,使用第一阶段的AI技能来比较传统方法和调整后的方法。该研究旨在确定传统训练方法在面对人工智能趋势时的适应性,同时保持人类尺度和空间尺度、审美品味和创新思维的相关性。这项研究的结果为教育工作者如何调整他们的教学方法,为学生提供在当前和未来的技术环境中取得成功所需的技能提供了见解。该研究还提供了讨论和可能的解决方案,以解决未来几代建筑教育工作者面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEASURING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN STUDENTS WITH/WITHOUT CARE-RESPONSIBILITIES TO PUSH GENDER EQUITY DESIGN OF POWER ELECTRONIC SYSTEM WITH VARIABLE TOPOLOGY OF THE MAIN CIRCUIT FOR EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT OF LABORATORY EXERCISES OF POWER SEMICONDUCTOR CONVERTERS IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENHANCING STUDENT PREPAREDNESS FOR CLINICAL EXAMS CRITICAL REFLEXIVITY AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN EDUCATION AND BEYOND CHALLENGES – TOWARDS CONTINUOUS PEER ASSESSMENT IN UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMING CLASSES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1