Exomoon candidates from transit timing variations: eight Kepler systems with TTVs explainable by photometrically unseen exomoons

C. Fox, P. Wiegert
{"title":"Exomoon candidates from transit timing variations: eight Kepler systems with TTVs explainable by photometrically unseen exomoons","authors":"C. Fox, P. Wiegert","doi":"10.1093/mnras/staa3743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If a transiting exoplanet has a moon, that moon could be detected directly from the transit itproduces itself, or indirectly via the transit timing variations it produces in its parent planet. There is a range of parameter space where the Kepler Space Telescope is sensitive to the TTVs exomoons might produce, though the moons themselves would be too small to detect photometrically via their own transits. The Earth's Moon, for example, produces TTVs of 2.6 minutes amplitude by causing our planet to move around their mutual center of mass. This ismore than Kepler's short-cadence interval of 1 minute and so nominally detectable (if transit timings are of comparable accuracy), even though the Moon's transit signatureis only 7% that of Earth's, well below Kepler's nominal threshold. Here we explore eight systems from the Kepler data set to examine the exomoon hypothesisas an explanation for their transit timing variations, which we compare with the alternatehypothesis that the TTVs are caused by an non-transiting planet in the system. We find that the TTVs of six of these systems could be plausibly explained by an exomoon, the size of which would not be nominally detectable by Kepler. Though we also find that the TTVsc ould be equally well reproduced by the presence of a non-transiting planet in the system, the observations are nevertheless completely consistent with a existence of a dynamically stablemoon small enough to fall below Kepler's photometric threshold for transit detection, and these systems warrant further observation and analysis.","PeriodicalId":8428,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

If a transiting exoplanet has a moon, that moon could be detected directly from the transit itproduces itself, or indirectly via the transit timing variations it produces in its parent planet. There is a range of parameter space where the Kepler Space Telescope is sensitive to the TTVs exomoons might produce, though the moons themselves would be too small to detect photometrically via their own transits. The Earth's Moon, for example, produces TTVs of 2.6 minutes amplitude by causing our planet to move around their mutual center of mass. This ismore than Kepler's short-cadence interval of 1 minute and so nominally detectable (if transit timings are of comparable accuracy), even though the Moon's transit signatureis only 7% that of Earth's, well below Kepler's nominal threshold. Here we explore eight systems from the Kepler data set to examine the exomoon hypothesisas an explanation for their transit timing variations, which we compare with the alternatehypothesis that the TTVs are caused by an non-transiting planet in the system. We find that the TTVs of six of these systems could be plausibly explained by an exomoon, the size of which would not be nominally detectable by Kepler. Though we also find that the TTVsc ould be equally well reproduced by the presence of a non-transiting planet in the system, the observations are nevertheless completely consistent with a existence of a dynamically stablemoon small enough to fall below Kepler's photometric threshold for transit detection, and these systems warrant further observation and analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自凌日时间变化的系外候选者:8个开普勒系统的ttv可以通过光度学上看不见的系外卫星来解释
如果一颗凌日系外行星有一颗卫星,那颗卫星可以直接通过它自己产生的凌日来探测,或者通过它在其母行星上产生的凌日时间变化来间接探测。在一定的参数范围内,开普勒太空望远镜对系外卫星可能产生的ttv很敏感,尽管这些卫星本身太小,无法通过它们自己的凌日来探测光度。例如,地球的月球通过使我们的星球围绕它们的共同质心移动而产生2.6分钟振幅的ttv。这比开普勒的1分钟的短周期间隔要多,所以名义上是可以探测到的(如果凌日时间具有相当的准确性),尽管月球的凌日特征只有地球的7%,远低于开普勒的名义阈值。在这里,我们探索了来自开普勒数据集的8个系统,以检验系外卫星假说对其凌日时间变化的解释,并将其与另一种假说进行了比较,即ttv是由系统中非凌日行星引起的。我们发现,其中六个系统的ttv可以用一颗系外卫星来解释,它的大小在名义上是开普勒探测不到的。虽然我们还发现,TTVsc也可以通过系统中存在一颗非凌日行星来很好地再现,但观测结果仍然完全符合一个动态稳定的卫星的存在,这个卫星小到足以低于开普勒探测凌日的光度阈值,这些系统值得进一步观察和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisiting The Averaged Problem in The Case of Mean-Motion Resonances of The Restricted Three-Body Problem. Global Rigorous Treatment and Application To The Co-Orbital Motion. Automatic planetary defense Deflecting NEOs by missiles shot from L1 and L3 (Earth-Moon). Modeling the nonaxisymmetric structure in the HD 163296 disk with planet-disk interaction Origin and dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt Revised planet brightness temperatures using the Planck/LFI 2018 data release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1