4CPS-288 Clinical pharmacist’s impact in improving the safety of therapies for patients using oral anticancer agents: a prospective single centre study

J. Tabe
{"title":"4CPS-288 Clinical pharmacist’s impact in improving the safety of therapies for patients using oral anticancer agents: a prospective single centre study","authors":"J. Tabe","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Oral anticancer agents (OAA) are frequently used in oncology practice. Drug interactions involving OAA are of great concern as they can cause an altered safety or efficacy profile for cancer treatments. Aim and objectives To estimate the prevalence of potential drug interactions in cancer patients to justify the implementation of preventive actions to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of cancer management, in a context where the relevance of care is a public health issue. Material and methods Data on drugs used for comorbidities, OAA, over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and herbal supplements were collected through a structured interview with the patient, a review of medical records and a call to the dispensing pharmacist. Potential drug interactions involving OAA were detected during the primary prescribing process using the databases Lexicomp and Micromedex. Results 51 patients were included in the study. The median age of patients was 70 years. We identified 26 potentially clinically significant interactions (PCSI) in 24 patients (47%). Of the PCSI detected, 17.4% were assessed by both sources as major interactions and 8.7% as moderate interactions. The OAA that interacted the most were anagrelide (19.2%), capecitabine (15.4%) and lenalidomide (11.5%). PCSI involving OAA appeared in the following therapeutic classes: PPI 26.9%, herbal therapy 11.5% and antiplatelet–anticoagulants 11.5%. We observed that 30.8% of PCSI resulted in an altered efficacy profile of the OAA. Conclusion and relevance Analysis of PCSI in cancer patients allows the description of the use of OAA and thus how to optimise monitoring of the correct use of these drugs. The clinical pharmacist can improve drug safety by notifying hospital and frontline healthcare staff of PCSI to reduce drug therapy problems and optimise drug therapy for these patients. References and/or acknowledgements Ranchon F, Bouret C, Charpiat B, et al. Securisation de l’emploi des chimiotherapies anticancereuses administrables par voie orale. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier 2009;44:36–44. Banna GL, Collova E, Gebbia V, et al. Anticancer oral therapy: Emerging related issues. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2010;36:595–605. Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Oral anticancer agents (OAA) are frequently used in oncology practice. Drug interactions involving OAA are of great concern as they can cause an altered safety or efficacy profile for cancer treatments. Aim and objectives To estimate the prevalence of potential drug interactions in cancer patients to justify the implementation of preventive actions to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of cancer management, in a context where the relevance of care is a public health issue. Material and methods Data on drugs used for comorbidities, OAA, over-the-counter (OTC) drugs and herbal supplements were collected through a structured interview with the patient, a review of medical records and a call to the dispensing pharmacist. Potential drug interactions involving OAA were detected during the primary prescribing process using the databases Lexicomp and Micromedex. Results 51 patients were included in the study. The median age of patients was 70 years. We identified 26 potentially clinically significant interactions (PCSI) in 24 patients (47%). Of the PCSI detected, 17.4% were assessed by both sources as major interactions and 8.7% as moderate interactions. The OAA that interacted the most were anagrelide (19.2%), capecitabine (15.4%) and lenalidomide (11.5%). PCSI involving OAA appeared in the following therapeutic classes: PPI 26.9%, herbal therapy 11.5% and antiplatelet–anticoagulants 11.5%. We observed that 30.8% of PCSI resulted in an altered efficacy profile of the OAA. Conclusion and relevance Analysis of PCSI in cancer patients allows the description of the use of OAA and thus how to optimise monitoring of the correct use of these drugs. The clinical pharmacist can improve drug safety by notifying hospital and frontline healthcare staff of PCSI to reduce drug therapy problems and optimise drug therapy for these patients. References and/or acknowledgements Ranchon F, Bouret C, Charpiat B, et al. Securisation de l’emploi des chimiotherapies anticancereuses administrables par voie orale. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier 2009;44:36–44. Banna GL, Collova E, Gebbia V, et al. Anticancer oral therapy: Emerging related issues. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2010;36:595–605. Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床药师对提高口服抗癌药物治疗安全性的影响:一项前瞻性单中心研究
背景与重要性口服抗癌药物(OAA)是肿瘤学实践中经常使用的药物。涉及OAA的药物相互作用引起了极大的关注,因为它们可能导致癌症治疗的安全性或有效性的改变。目的和目标估计癌症患者中潜在药物相互作用的普遍程度,以证明在护理相关性是一个公共卫生问题的背景下,实施预防行动以优化癌症管理的有效性和效率是合理的。材料和方法通过对患者进行结构化访谈、查阅医疗记录和致电配药药剂师,收集用于合并症、OAA、非处方药(OTC)和草药补充剂的药物数据。使用Lexicomp和Micromedex数据库在初始处方过程中检测涉及OAA的潜在药物相互作用。结果51例患者纳入研究。患者中位年龄为70岁。我们在24例患者(47%)中发现了26例潜在的临床显著相互作用(PCSI)。在检测到的PCSI中,17.4%被两个来源评估为主要相互作用,8.7%被评估为中度相互作用。相互作用最多的OAA分别为阿那格列特(19.2%)、卡培他滨(15.4%)和来那度胺(11.5%)。涉及OAA的PCSI出现在以下治疗类别:PPI 26.9%,草药治疗11.5%,抗血小板-抗凝剂11.5%。我们观察到30.8%的PCSI导致了OAA疗效的改变。结论和相关性分析癌症患者的PCSI允许描述OAA的使用,从而如何优化监测这些药物的正确使用。临床药师可以通过通知医院和一线医护人员PCSI来提高用药安全性,减少药物治疗问题,优化这些患者的药物治疗。Ranchon F, Bouret C, Charpiat B等。化疗药物、抗癌药物和可管理药物的证券化。医院法医学2009;44:36-44。刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,等。抗癌口服治疗:新出现的相关问题。癌症治疗评论2010;36:595-605。利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1