Comparison of two ketamine/xylazine anesthesic protocols in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)

M. Guevara, Sofía Ana Lorenzo Acquaro, M. Giai, P. Gargiulo
{"title":"Comparison of two ketamine/xylazine anesthesic protocols in pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)","authors":"M. Guevara, Sofía Ana Lorenzo Acquaro, M. Giai, P. Gargiulo","doi":"10.21472/bjbs.051114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pig (Sus scrofa domestica) is an animal used as an experimental model in surgical procedures. This makes the use of anaesthesia necessary. The present study constitutes a comparison between two different ketamine/xylazine concentration protocols. One protocol used ketamine 10% + xylazine 10% (high concentration), and the other ketamine 5% + xylazine 2% (low concentration). Concentrations were chosen since these are the most common presentations in the veterinary market. In the present experiments, twenty male and female pigs (Sus scrofa domestica; 20 kg each), were assigned into two different groups. The first one was integrated by pigs treated with high concentration protocol (n = 10), and the second one, composed by pigs that received low concentration protocol (n = 10). Parameters measured were the time in which the animals were placed in sternal decubitus, and the heart rate. The effects of these drugs were considered not only specifically in its sedative effects, but also in the respiratory system. Based on these results, we conclude that the first protocol showed better results than the second one. The time in which the animals were placed in sternal decubitus was lower in the first one (p < 0.001). Differences between the effects on the respiratory system (p = 0.37) and sedative effects (p = 0.87) were not significant, even when focusing on the last measurement, higher concentration protocol was twenty percent (20%) more effective than lower.","PeriodicalId":9319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":"83 1","pages":"765-772"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21472/bjbs.051114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pig (Sus scrofa domestica) is an animal used as an experimental model in surgical procedures. This makes the use of anaesthesia necessary. The present study constitutes a comparison between two different ketamine/xylazine concentration protocols. One protocol used ketamine 10% + xylazine 10% (high concentration), and the other ketamine 5% + xylazine 2% (low concentration). Concentrations were chosen since these are the most common presentations in the veterinary market. In the present experiments, twenty male and female pigs (Sus scrofa domestica; 20 kg each), were assigned into two different groups. The first one was integrated by pigs treated with high concentration protocol (n = 10), and the second one, composed by pigs that received low concentration protocol (n = 10). Parameters measured were the time in which the animals were placed in sternal decubitus, and the heart rate. The effects of these drugs were considered not only specifically in its sedative effects, but also in the respiratory system. Based on these results, we conclude that the first protocol showed better results than the second one. The time in which the animals were placed in sternal decubitus was lower in the first one (p < 0.001). Differences between the effects on the respiratory system (p = 0.37) and sedative effects (p = 0.87) were not significant, even when focusing on the last measurement, higher concentration protocol was twenty percent (20%) more effective than lower.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮/噻嗪两种猪麻醉方案的比较
猪(Sus scrofa domestica)是外科手术中用作实验模型的动物。这就需要使用麻醉剂。本研究是对两种不同氯胺酮/噻嗪浓度方案的比较。一种方案使用氯胺酮10% +木嗪10%(高浓度),另一种方案使用氯胺酮5% +木嗪2%(低浓度)。选择浓度是因为这些是兽医市场上最常见的表现。本试验选用20只公、母猪(苏氏家猪;每只体重20公斤),分为两组。第一组由高浓度处理的猪组成(n = 10),第二组由低浓度处理的猪组成(n = 10)。测量的参数是动物处于胸骨卧位的时间和心率。这些药物的作用不仅体现在镇静作用上,而且还体现在呼吸系统上。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,第一种方案比第二种方案效果更好。第一组动物处于胸骨卧位的时间较低(p < 0.001)。对呼吸系统的影响(p = 0.37)和镇静作用(p = 0.87)之间的差异不显著,即使在最后一次测量时,高浓度方案比低浓度方案有效20%(20%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ações de Ensino/Aprendizagem de Restaurações Indiretas por meio de Resina Direta Tratada Termicamente - RDTT: Relato de Experiência Análise de Enterobactérias em Emerita brasiliensis (Schmitt, 1935) Coletados na Praia de Balneário Rincão, Santa Catarina, Brasil “Gosto de ser livre, fazer as coisas no tempo que quero” Depoimentos de mulheres que optaram pela não maternidade Avaliação da qualidade de vida em pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço acometidos pela caquexia: uma revisão de literatura Strogonoff de frango enriquecido com biomassa de banana verde
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1