Use of prophylactic antibiotics on surgical site infections in arthroplasty patients (Scoping Review)

Irsan Fahmi Almuhtarihan, S Suharjono, Primadenny Ariesa Airlangga, E. Padolo
{"title":"Use of prophylactic antibiotics on surgical site infections in arthroplasty patients (Scoping Review)","authors":"Irsan Fahmi Almuhtarihan, S Suharjono, Primadenny Ariesa Airlangga, E. Padolo","doi":"10.1177/22104917221082313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Increased demand for arthroplasty also increases the number of complications of arthroplasty, especially surgical site infection (SSI). One of the effective strategies in preventing surgical site infection is the use of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics. Objective To identify and analyse information from clinical studies regarding factors affecting the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in arthroplasty patients. Methods A scoping review was conducted through the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases within a publication range from January 2004 to August 2020. Study data are extracted and analysed by a minimum of two reviewers. Results The search results found 2.419 articles, with 39 articles were included for further analysis. Cefazolin monotherapy was the most frequently studied antibiotic (15 articles) followed by vancomycin monotherapy (8 articles). Most widely used antibiotics in arthroplasty were cefazolin mono-therapy (997.599 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0,20–16,05%) followed by vancomycin mono-therapy (125.170 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0.27–3,88%) The correct antibiotic dose has a lower percentage of the SSI than the wrong antibiotic dose. Meanwhile, administration of antibiotics within single dose or <24 h had a lower SSI percentage than administration of antibiotics >24 h. Administration antibiotics before incision also have a lower SSI percentage than after incision. There were no studies that discussed re-dosing of antibiotics in this scoping review. Conclusions There is still a need for further research related to the duration and specific timing of first dose of prophylactic antibiotics, especially regarding single dose or multiple dose antibiotics to obtain maximum effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"323 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221082313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Increased demand for arthroplasty also increases the number of complications of arthroplasty, especially surgical site infection (SSI). One of the effective strategies in preventing surgical site infection is the use of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics. Objective To identify and analyse information from clinical studies regarding factors affecting the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in arthroplasty patients. Methods A scoping review was conducted through the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases within a publication range from January 2004 to August 2020. Study data are extracted and analysed by a minimum of two reviewers. Results The search results found 2.419 articles, with 39 articles were included for further analysis. Cefazolin monotherapy was the most frequently studied antibiotic (15 articles) followed by vancomycin monotherapy (8 articles). Most widely used antibiotics in arthroplasty were cefazolin mono-therapy (997.599 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0,20–16,05%) followed by vancomycin mono-therapy (125.170 procedures with SSI incidence range: 0.27–3,88%) The correct antibiotic dose has a lower percentage of the SSI than the wrong antibiotic dose. Meanwhile, administration of antibiotics within single dose or <24 h had a lower SSI percentage than administration of antibiotics >24 h. Administration antibiotics before incision also have a lower SSI percentage than after incision. There were no studies that discussed re-dosing of antibiotics in this scoping review. Conclusions There is still a need for further research related to the duration and specific timing of first dose of prophylactic antibiotics, especially regarding single dose or multiple dose antibiotics to obtain maximum effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性抗生素在关节置换术患者手术部位感染中的应用(范围综述)
背景:关节置换术需求的增加也增加了关节置换术并发症的数量,尤其是手术部位感染(SSI)。预防手术部位感染的有效策略之一是使用适当的预防性抗生素。目的对影响关节置换术患者预防性抗生素使用效果的因素进行临床分析。方法对2004年1月至2020年8月出版的PubMed、Scopus和谷歌Scholar数据库进行范围综述。研究数据由至少两名审稿人提取和分析。结果检索到文献2.419篇,其中纳入39篇进行进一步分析。头孢唑林单药治疗是研究最多的抗生素(15篇),其次是万古霉素单药治疗(8篇)。关节置换术中最广泛使用的抗生素是头孢唑林单药(997.599例,SSI发生率范围:0.20 - 16.05%),其次是万古霉素单药(125.170例,SSI发生率范围:0.27 - 3.88%)。正确的抗生素剂量比错误的抗生素剂量的SSI百分比要低。同时,单次给药或24 h给药。切口前使用抗生素的SSI百分比也低于切口后。在本综述中没有研究讨论抗生素的重新给药。结论预防性抗生素首次给药的持续时间和具体时间,特别是单剂量或多剂量抗生素,仍需进一步研究,以获得最大的抗生素预防效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1