{"title":"Towards an Ethnography Commons","authors":"Eli Elinoff","doi":"10.26686/ce.v1i1.4126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"| How might the notion of an ethnography commons transform ethnographic research practice and pedagogy? In this paper, I consider how the concept of the commons, in all of its messiness, might provide a way of not only addressing questions surrounding the boundaries of ethnographic research and knowledge that have been fundamental to anthropology since Writing Culture (Clifford and Marcus 1986), but also for crafting more transformative research and social interventions into the world itself. I do so first by considering how contemporary structures of capitalism are shaping the university, our research, and our relationships with our students. Then, I trace the ways in which the debates about the boundaries of ethnography have transformed research and pedagogy over the last 20 years. Finally, I conclude by suggesting a number of potential trajectories for acting on the promise of the commons through ethnographic teaching and research.","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/ce.v1i1.4126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
| How might the notion of an ethnography commons transform ethnographic research practice and pedagogy? In this paper, I consider how the concept of the commons, in all of its messiness, might provide a way of not only addressing questions surrounding the boundaries of ethnographic research and knowledge that have been fundamental to anthropology since Writing Culture (Clifford and Marcus 1986), but also for crafting more transformative research and social interventions into the world itself. I do so first by considering how contemporary structures of capitalism are shaping the university, our research, and our relationships with our students. Then, I trace the ways in which the debates about the boundaries of ethnography have transformed research and pedagogy over the last 20 years. Finally, I conclude by suggesting a number of potential trajectories for acting on the promise of the commons through ethnographic teaching and research.
民族志公地的概念将如何改变民族志研究实践和教学?在本文中,我考虑了公地的概念,在它所有的混乱中,如何提供一种方法,不仅可以解决围绕民族志研究和知识的边界的问题,这些问题自写作文化(Clifford and Marcus 1986)以来一直是人类学的基础,而且还可以为世界本身创造更多的变革性研究和社会干预。为此,我首先考虑了当代资本主义结构是如何塑造大学、我们的研究以及我们与学生的关系的。然后,我追溯了在过去的20年里,关于民族志边界的争论是如何改变了研究和教学的。最后,我提出了一些潜在的轨迹,通过民族志教学和研究来实现共同的承诺。
期刊介绍:
Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.