A prospective study on treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

T. Das, K. Chatterjee
{"title":"A prospective study on treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin","authors":"T. Das, K. Chatterjee","doi":"10.5455/ijmsph.2020.12348201930012020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rechallenge of a platinum-based chemotherapy is the most common approach for a recurrent platinumsensitive epithelial carcinoma ovary. However, this carries a substantial risk of cumulative neurotoxicity. Objectives: In the present study, we tried to compare the efficacy and toxicities of gemcitabine pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination regimen to rechallenge of paclitaxel-carboplatin in this setting. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups each containing 15 patients. The study group received injection gemcitabine at the dose of 1 g/m2 injection intravenously on day 1 and day 8 and liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1 in a 3 weekly cycle up to a total of six cycles in absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The control group patients were treated with injection paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 I/V infusion and injection carboplatin at a dose considering area under the curve 6 in a 3 weekly for six cycles. Results: In the study arm, out of 14 patients, 4 (28.57%) patients had complete response, 6 (42.85%) had partial response, 3 (21.42%) had stable disease, and 1 (7.14%) showed disease progression. In the control arm, 6 (40%) patients out of 15 showed complete response, and 4 (26.66%) partial response. Disease progression was noted in 1 (6.66%) patient. There was less incidence of neurotoxicity compared to the control arm. Conclusion: Chemotherapy with a combination of gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows equivalent efficacy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer when compared to rechallenge of platinum-based chemotherapy. The regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile with lesser incidence of neuropathy than rechallenge of paclitaxel-carboplatin combination.","PeriodicalId":14153,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","volume":"48 1","pages":"224-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2020.12348201930012020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rechallenge of a platinum-based chemotherapy is the most common approach for a recurrent platinumsensitive epithelial carcinoma ovary. However, this carries a substantial risk of cumulative neurotoxicity. Objectives: In the present study, we tried to compare the efficacy and toxicities of gemcitabine pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination regimen to rechallenge of paclitaxel-carboplatin in this setting. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups each containing 15 patients. The study group received injection gemcitabine at the dose of 1 g/m2 injection intravenously on day 1 and day 8 and liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1 in a 3 weekly cycle up to a total of six cycles in absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The control group patients were treated with injection paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 I/V infusion and injection carboplatin at a dose considering area under the curve 6 in a 3 weekly for six cycles. Results: In the study arm, out of 14 patients, 4 (28.57%) patients had complete response, 6 (42.85%) had partial response, 3 (21.42%) had stable disease, and 1 (7.14%) showed disease progression. In the control arm, 6 (40%) patients out of 15 showed complete response, and 4 (26.66%) partial response. Disease progression was noted in 1 (6.66%) patient. There was less incidence of neurotoxicity compared to the control arm. Conclusion: Chemotherapy with a combination of gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin shows equivalent efficacy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer when compared to rechallenge of platinum-based chemotherapy. The regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile with lesser incidence of neuropathy than rechallenge of paclitaxel-carboplatin combination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吉西他滨和聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性上皮性卵巢癌的前瞻性研究
背景:铂基化疗是复发性卵巢铂敏感上皮癌最常见的治疗方法。然而,这带来了累积神经毒性的巨大风险。目的:在本研究中,我们试图比较吉西他滨聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素联合方案在这种情况下对紫杉醇-卡铂的再挑战的疗效和毒性。材料与方法:共纳入30例患者。患者随机分为两组,每组15例。研究组在没有疾病进展或不可接受的毒性的情况下,在第1天和第8天静脉注射剂量为1 g/m2的吉西他滨,在第1天注射剂量为30 mg/m2的脂质体阿霉素,以3周为一个周期,总共6个周期。对照组患者注射紫杉醇,剂量为175 mg/m2 I/V输注,卡铂注射剂量考虑曲线下面积6,每3周治疗6个周期。结果:研究组14例患者中,完全缓解4例(28.57%),部分缓解6例(42.85%),病情稳定3例(21.42%),疾病进展1例(7.14%)。在对照组中,15例患者中有6例(40%)完全缓解,4例(26.66%)部分缓解。1例(6.66%)患者出现疾病进展。与对照组相比,神经毒性发生率较低。结论:吉西他滨联合聚乙二醇化脂质体多柔比星联合化疗与铂基化疗相比,对铂敏感的复发性卵巢癌疗效相当。该方案具有可接受的毒性,与紫杉醇-卡铂联合治疗相比,其神经病变发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitude, and preventive behavior toward COVID-19 of high school students in Bangkok, Thailand: A study among students in harrow's international school Knowledge, attitude, and drug resistance preventive behaviors of high school students in Bangkok Effect of neurodynamic techniques on radiating symptoms and mechanosensitivity of neural tissue in subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial Correlation of homocysteine and Vitamin B12 level as a surrogative marker for early detection of sensorineural hearing loss in children Mutations in genes onset the disease of cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1