Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 pulmonary typical carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score matching analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivac125
Hao Yang, Tong-hua Mei
{"title":"Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 pulmonary typical carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Hao Yang, Tong-hua Mei","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivac125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract OBJECTIVES It is widely accepted that surgical resection of localized pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) tumours remains the primary curative modality. However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the survival rates of patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours who underwent sublobar resection or lobectomy. METHODS We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients who underwent surgery after being diagnosed with stage T1-2N0M0 TCs from 2004 to 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to equalize the baseline characteristics between the sublobar resection group and the lobectomy group. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were performed for survival analysis. RESULTS Of the 2469 patients included, 658 (26.65%) underwent sublobar resection and 1811 (73.35%) underwent lobectomy. All 2469 patients were analysed with PSM and, following PSM, 812 patients were included in the final analysis and divided into 2 groups of 406 patients. In the matched cohort, Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in survival curves between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours [5-year overall survival (OS) = 90.78% vs 93.30%; hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–1.80; P = 0.505]. Subgroup analysis by tumour size showed that the sublobar resection group was identical to the lobectomy group in OS for tumours ≤3.0 cm. In addition, no difference in OS between surgical groups was observed in any subgroups. In the multivariable Cox analysis, age ≤65 years, female sex, married status and adequate lymph node assessment (≥5) were associated with improved OS, whereas the extent of resection was not. CONCLUSIONS Sublobar resection seems to be associated with similar survival to lobectomy for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. This analysis suggests that sublobar resection should be considered an appropriate alternative for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours. However, further validations are needed in large, multicentre prospective studies.","PeriodicalId":13621,"journal":{"name":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES It is widely accepted that surgical resection of localized pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) tumours remains the primary curative modality. However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the survival rates of patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours who underwent sublobar resection or lobectomy. METHODS We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients who underwent surgery after being diagnosed with stage T1-2N0M0 TCs from 2004 to 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to equalize the baseline characteristics between the sublobar resection group and the lobectomy group. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were performed for survival analysis. RESULTS Of the 2469 patients included, 658 (26.65%) underwent sublobar resection and 1811 (73.35%) underwent lobectomy. All 2469 patients were analysed with PSM and, following PSM, 812 patients were included in the final analysis and divided into 2 groups of 406 patients. In the matched cohort, Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in survival curves between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours [5-year overall survival (OS) = 90.78% vs 93.30%; hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–1.80; P = 0.505]. Subgroup analysis by tumour size showed that the sublobar resection group was identical to the lobectomy group in OS for tumours ≤3.0 cm. In addition, no difference in OS between surgical groups was observed in any subgroups. In the multivariable Cox analysis, age ≤65 years, female sex, married status and adequate lymph node assessment (≥5) were associated with improved OS, whereas the extent of resection was not. CONCLUSIONS Sublobar resection seems to be associated with similar survival to lobectomy for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. This analysis suggests that sublobar resection should be considered an appropriate alternative for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours. However, further validations are needed in large, multicentre prospective studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺叶下切除术与肺叶切除术治疗T1-2N0M0期肺典型类癌:基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析
摘要目的手术切除局限性肺典型类癌(TC)肿瘤是目前公认的主要治疗方式。然而,最佳切除范围仍有争议。本研究旨在探讨T1-2N0M0期TC肿瘤患者行叶下切除术或肺叶切除术后的生存率。方法:我们查询了2004年至2016年诊断为T1-2N0M0期tc后接受手术的患者的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库。倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析用于平衡叶下切除术组和叶下切除术组之间的基线特征。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型。结果纳入的2469例患者中,658例(26.65%)行肺叶下切除术,1811例(73.35%)行肺叶切除术。所有2469例患者进行PSM分析,在PSM之后,812例患者被纳入最终分析,分为2组406例患者。在匹配的队列中,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在T1-2N0M0期TC肿瘤患者中,叶下切除术组和叶下切除术组的生存曲线无显著差异[5年总生存率(OS) = 90.78% vs 93.30%;风险比1.18,95%置信区间:0.77-1.80;p = 0.505]。肿瘤大小的亚组分析显示,肿瘤≤3.0 cm的OS,叶下切除术组与叶下切除术组相同。此外,在任何亚组中,手术组之间的OS均无差异。在多变量Cox分析中,年龄≤65岁、女性、婚姻状况和足够的淋巴结评估(≥5)与OS改善相关,而切除程度与OS改善无关。结论:如果淋巴结评估充分,对于T1-2N0M0期TC肿瘤,叶下切除术与叶下切除术的生存率相似。该分析表明,对于T1-2N0M0期TC肿瘤,应考虑采用叶下切除术。然而,需要在大型、多中心的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS) publishes scientific contributions in the field of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, covering all aspects of surgery of the heart, vessels and the chest. The journal publishes a range of article types including: Best Evidence Topics; Brief Communications; Case Reports; Original Articles; State-of-the-Art; Work in Progress Report.
期刊最新文献
Local tumour residue after microwave ablation for lung cancer: a case report. Long-term outcomes of papillary muscle relocation anteriorly for functional mitral regurgitation. Postoperative aortic injury caused by a staple line formed during wedge resection of the lung. Surgical management of cardiac cystic echinococcosis in a paediatric patient: a case report. Congenital aortocaval fistula combined with patent ductus arteriosus in an infant: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1