‘SYRIZA and Podemos, we shall overcome’? Left transnational cooperation in times of crisis

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Capital and Class Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1177/03098168211061585
Vladimir Bortun
{"title":"‘SYRIZA and Podemos, we shall overcome’? Left transnational cooperation in times of crisis","authors":"Vladimir Bortun","doi":"10.1177/03098168211061585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Eurozone crisis and its austerity-centred management opened up a fertile ground for the so-called ‘radical left parties’ (RLPs) and their anti-austerity agenda. Moreover, it provided a unique opportunity for this party family to enhance its rather underdeveloped transnational cooperation. Sharing several objective and subjective features, SYRIZA (Greece) and Podemos (Spain) – arguably the two most prominent European RLPs today – seemed particularly well-placed to develop a strong transnational cooperation. However, the current literature has hardly addressed whether such expectations have been borne out. Indeed, despite a recently increased interest in the radical left, there are still very few studies focusing on the transnational cooperation among RLPs. Building on documentary research and qualitative elite interviews covering the 2014–2017 period, the article has two main objectives: first, to map the cooperation between SYRIZA and Podemos by identifying the key channels and actors of this process; second, to assess their cooperation over said period, with a focus on the factors fuelling and obstructing it. The article argues that the relationship between the two parties reached its peak around SYRIZA’s electoral victory in January 2015 but declined following its deal with the ‘Troika’ 6 months later, which blatantly contradicted SYRIZA’s anti-austerity programme. It is shown that while the main incentives behind their cooperation have been their shared opposition to neoliberalism, the European Union’s (EU) reaction to the crisis, and the similarities in their countries’ economic situations, the main obstacles hindering that cooperation have been the primacy of national politics and the diverging views on the EU. The findings arguably provide useful insights for the wider left transnational cooperation today, in a time of renewed global capitalist crisis, when such cooperation is perhaps more relevant than ever.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital and Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168211061585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Eurozone crisis and its austerity-centred management opened up a fertile ground for the so-called ‘radical left parties’ (RLPs) and their anti-austerity agenda. Moreover, it provided a unique opportunity for this party family to enhance its rather underdeveloped transnational cooperation. Sharing several objective and subjective features, SYRIZA (Greece) and Podemos (Spain) – arguably the two most prominent European RLPs today – seemed particularly well-placed to develop a strong transnational cooperation. However, the current literature has hardly addressed whether such expectations have been borne out. Indeed, despite a recently increased interest in the radical left, there are still very few studies focusing on the transnational cooperation among RLPs. Building on documentary research and qualitative elite interviews covering the 2014–2017 period, the article has two main objectives: first, to map the cooperation between SYRIZA and Podemos by identifying the key channels and actors of this process; second, to assess their cooperation over said period, with a focus on the factors fuelling and obstructing it. The article argues that the relationship between the two parties reached its peak around SYRIZA’s electoral victory in January 2015 but declined following its deal with the ‘Troika’ 6 months later, which blatantly contradicted SYRIZA’s anti-austerity programme. It is shown that while the main incentives behind their cooperation have been their shared opposition to neoliberalism, the European Union’s (EU) reaction to the crisis, and the similarities in their countries’ economic situations, the main obstacles hindering that cooperation have been the primacy of national politics and the diverging views on the EU. The findings arguably provide useful insights for the wider left transnational cooperation today, in a time of renewed global capitalist crisis, when such cooperation is perhaps more relevant than ever.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“激进左翼联盟和我们可以党,我们会战胜的”?在危机时刻离开跨国合作
欧元区危机及其以紧缩为中心的管理为所谓的“激进左翼政党”(rlp)及其反紧缩议程开辟了肥沃的土壤。此外,它还为这个政党大家庭加强其相当不发达的跨国合作提供了一个独特的机会。希腊的激进左翼联盟(SYRIZA)和西班牙的“我们可以”党(Podemos)——可以说是当今欧洲最著名的两大左翼政党——在发展强大的跨国合作方面具有若干客观和主观特征,似乎处于有利地位。然而,目前的文献几乎没有提到这些期望是否已经得到证实。事实上,尽管最近对激进左翼的兴趣有所增加,但关注rlp之间跨国合作的研究仍然很少。本文以2014-2017年期间的文献研究和定性精英访谈为基础,有两个主要目标:首先,通过确定这一过程的关键渠道和行动者,描绘激进左翼联盟和“我们可以”之间的合作;第二,评估两国在上述时期的合作,重点分析推动和阻碍合作的因素。文章认为,两党之间的关系在2015年1月激进左翼联盟选举胜利前后达到顶峰,但在6个月后与“三驾马车”达成协议后下降,这公然与激进左翼联盟的反紧缩计划相矛盾。研究表明,虽然两国合作背后的主要动机是共同反对新自由主义、欧盟对危机的反应以及两国经济状况的相似性,但阻碍合作的主要障碍是国家政治的首要地位和对欧盟的分歧看法。可以说,这些发现为今天更广泛的左翼跨国合作提供了有用的见解,在全球资本主义危机重新爆发的时代,这种合作可能比以往任何时候都更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Capital and Class
Capital and Class POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Book review: Hope in Hopeless Times Book Review: Caste Matters Book Review: We the Elites: Why the US Constitution Serves the Few Book Review: Can Global Capitalism Endure? Book Review: Politics of Immunity: Security and the Policing of Bodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1