Use of the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity and Mayo endoscopic score for predicting the therapeutic effect of mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis

Haotian Chen , Lexi Wu , Mengyu Wang , Bule Shao , Lingna Ye , Yu Zhang , Qian Cao
{"title":"Use of the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity and Mayo endoscopic score for predicting the therapeutic effect of mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis","authors":"Haotian Chen ,&nbsp;Lexi Wu ,&nbsp;Mengyu Wang ,&nbsp;Bule Shao ,&nbsp;Lingna Ye ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Qian Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2021.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) are developed as objective methods of evaluating endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and MES in predicting the patient's response to mesalazine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients with UC who had undergone colonoscopy within 1 month before starting mesalazine between October 2011 and July 2016 were retrospectively collected at the Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The median follow-up was 81 months, and all the data were analyzed in January 2021. The primary outcome was the need for step-up treatment, which included the use of corticosteroids, immunomodulatory, or surgery during admission and follow-up. Data were analyzed using the χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher exact test, Spearman test, <em>t</em>-test, and Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Totally, 65 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 (18.5%) needed step-up treatment due to nonresponse to mesalazine. The UCEIS score, MES, and the ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) score were significantly higher in patients who had nonresponse to mesalazine (UCEIS score: 6.92 ± 0.69 vs. 4.45 ± 1.17, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; MES: 2.67 ± 0.49 vs. 2.15 ± 0.69, <em>p</em> = 0.024; UCDAI score: 9.33 ± 1.87 vs. 6.70 ± 2.38, <em>p</em> = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, the UCEIS score (OR = 25.65, 95% CI: 3.048–45.985, <em>p</em> = 0.003), UCDAI score (OR = 1.605, 95% CI: 1.144–2.254, <em>p</em> = 0.006), and C-reactive protein level (OR = 1.056, 95% CI: 1.006–1.108, <em>p</em> = 0.026) were independent risk factors of nonresponse. The area under the ROC curve of UCEIS was 0.95, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84.6%, a cut-off value of 6, which outperformed the MES with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70. When the UCEIS score ≥6, 60% of patients eventually needed step-up treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The UCEIS is a useful instrument for predicting the therapeutic effect in patients with UC treated with mesalazine. The high probability of mesalazine treatment failure and benefits of other therapies should be discussed in patients with baseline UCEIS score ≥6.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lers.2021.04.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) are developed as objective methods of evaluating endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and MES in predicting the patient's response to mesalazine.

Methods

Consecutive patients with UC who had undergone colonoscopy within 1 month before starting mesalazine between October 2011 and July 2016 were retrospectively collected at the Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The median follow-up was 81 months, and all the data were analyzed in January 2021. The primary outcome was the need for step-up treatment, which included the use of corticosteroids, immunomodulatory, or surgery during admission and follow-up. Data were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, Spearman test, t-test, and Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Totally, 65 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 (18.5%) needed step-up treatment due to nonresponse to mesalazine. The UCEIS score, MES, and the ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) score were significantly higher in patients who had nonresponse to mesalazine (UCEIS score: 6.92 ± 0.69 vs. 4.45 ± 1.17, p < 0.001; MES: 2.67 ± 0.49 vs. 2.15 ± 0.69, p = 0.024; UCDAI score: 9.33 ± 1.87 vs. 6.70 ± 2.38, p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, the UCEIS score (OR = 25.65, 95% CI: 3.048–45.985, p = 0.003), UCDAI score (OR = 1.605, 95% CI: 1.144–2.254, p = 0.006), and C-reactive protein level (OR = 1.056, 95% CI: 1.006–1.108, p = 0.026) were independent risk factors of nonresponse. The area under the ROC curve of UCEIS was 0.95, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84.6%, a cut-off value of 6, which outperformed the MES with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70. When the UCEIS score ≥6, 60% of patients eventually needed step-up treatment.

Conclusions

The UCEIS is a useful instrument for predicting the therapeutic effect in patients with UC treated with mesalazine. The high probability of mesalazine treatment failure and benefits of other therapies should be discussed in patients with baseline UCEIS score ≥6.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用溃疡性结肠炎内镜严重程度指数和Mayo内镜评分预测美沙拉嗪对溃疡性结肠炎患者的治疗效果
目的建立溃疡性结肠炎内镜严重程度指数(UCEIS)和Mayo内镜评分(MES),作为评估溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者内镜严重程度的客观方法。本研究的目的是探讨UCEIS和MES在预测患者对美沙拉嗪的反应方面的诊断准确性。方法回顾性收集2011年10月至2016年7月浙江大学医学院邵逸夫医院消化内科1个月内连续行结肠镜检查的UC患者。中位随访81个月,所有数据于2021年1月进行分析。主要结局是需要加强治疗,包括在入院和随访期间使用皮质类固醇、免疫调节剂或手术。数据分析采用χ2或Fisher精确检验、Spearman检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。结果共纳入65例患者,其中12例(18.5%)因对美沙拉嗪无反应需要加强治疗。美沙拉嗪无反应患者的UCEIS评分、MES和溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数(UCDAI)评分均显著高于对照组(UCEIS评分:6.92±0.69比4.45±1.17,p <0.001;MES: 2.67±0.49 vs. 2.15±0.69,p = 0.024;UCDAI得分:9.33±1.87和6.70±2.38,p = 0.002)。在多因素分析中,UCEIS评分(OR = 25.65, 95% CI: 3.048 ~ 45.985, p = 0.003)、UCDAI评分(OR = 1.605, 95% CI: 1.144 ~ 2.254, p = 0.006)和c反应蛋白水平(OR = 1.056, 95% CI: 1.006 ~ 1.108, p = 0.026)是无反应的独立危险因素。UCEIS的ROC曲线下面积为0.95,灵敏度为100%,特异性为84.6%,截断值为6,优于MES的ROC曲线下面积为0.70。当UCEIS评分≥6时,60%的患者最终需要加强治疗。结论UCEIS是预测美沙拉嗪治疗UC疗效的有效工具。对于基线UCEIS评分≥6的患者,应讨论美萨拉嗪治疗失败的高概率和其他治疗的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life Managerial perspectives of scaling up robotic-assisted surgery in healthcare systems: A systematic literature review Minimally invasive management of parapharyngeal space tumors: Introducing a decision-making algorithm and radiologic tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1