Educational Equity Patterns in South Carolina Career and Technical Education

Nickolas J. Sumpter, C. Cale, Michelle McCraney, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar
{"title":"Educational Equity Patterns in South Carolina Career and Technical Education","authors":"Nickolas J. Sumpter, C. Cale, Michelle McCraney, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v15n2p32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuller Hamilton et al. (2015) review provided a suggested model to improve Career and Technical Education (CTE) equity so that this study could be replicated systematically. National resources examining CTE educational equity components did not exist. The problem addressed in the replication study was the need to explore educational inequity within the South Carolina CTE Health Science career cluster. No CTE educational equity research exists in South Carolina, so the purpose of the replication study was to explore educational inequity within the South Carolina CTE Health Science career cluster. Cultural Replication Theory was the conceptual framework used for this replication study. Four research questions were formulated to examine the CTE enrollment patterns in South Carolina concerning four demographic characteristics, namely sex, race/ethnicity, region, and socioeconomic status. Students enrolled in CTE within South Carolina during the 2018-19 school year was the population selected. Secondary data was collected from a sample of 196,318 CTE enrollees and examined using descriptive analysis procedures. Overall results were not uniform. Inconsistent levels of inequity existed within race, ethnicity, and sex. In addition, inequity was present regarding regional effects and socioeconomic status. Future recommendations for research include conducting a qualitative or mixed-method study to further explain the enrollment patterns of CTE programs in South Carolina. Implications for practice to address the inequities in South Carolina include improving the underrepresentation of educators by sex and race/ethnicity, recommending equity audits, examination of access and availability of opportunities within CTE programs, and encouragement of all educators actively adopting and advancing an equity agenda from the original study.","PeriodicalId":12573,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Health Science","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v15n2p32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuller Hamilton et al. (2015) review provided a suggested model to improve Career and Technical Education (CTE) equity so that this study could be replicated systematically. National resources examining CTE educational equity components did not exist. The problem addressed in the replication study was the need to explore educational inequity within the South Carolina CTE Health Science career cluster. No CTE educational equity research exists in South Carolina, so the purpose of the replication study was to explore educational inequity within the South Carolina CTE Health Science career cluster. Cultural Replication Theory was the conceptual framework used for this replication study. Four research questions were formulated to examine the CTE enrollment patterns in South Carolina concerning four demographic characteristics, namely sex, race/ethnicity, region, and socioeconomic status. Students enrolled in CTE within South Carolina during the 2018-19 school year was the population selected. Secondary data was collected from a sample of 196,318 CTE enrollees and examined using descriptive analysis procedures. Overall results were not uniform. Inconsistent levels of inequity existed within race, ethnicity, and sex. In addition, inequity was present regarding regional effects and socioeconomic status. Future recommendations for research include conducting a qualitative or mixed-method study to further explain the enrollment patterns of CTE programs in South Carolina. Implications for practice to address the inequities in South Carolina include improving the underrepresentation of educators by sex and race/ethnicity, recommending equity audits, examination of access and availability of opportunities within CTE programs, and encouragement of all educators actively adopting and advancing an equity agenda from the original study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南卡罗来纳州职业技术教育的教育公平模式
Fuller Hamilton等人(2015)的综述提供了一个改善职业技术教育(CTE)公平的建议模型,从而可以系统地复制本研究。考察CTE教育公平成分的国家资源并不存在。在重复研究中解决的问题是需要探索南卡罗来纳州CTE健康科学职业集群中的教育不平等。南卡罗来纳州没有CTE教育公平研究,因此本重复研究的目的是探讨南卡罗来纳州CTE健康科学职业集群内的教育不公平。文化复制理论是这个复制研究使用的概念框架。研究人员制定了四个研究问题,以考察南卡罗来纳州CTE的招生模式,涉及四个人口统计学特征,即性别、种族/民族、地区和社会经济地位。在2018-19学年在南卡罗来纳州注册CTE的学生是被选中的人群。次要资料收集自196,318名CTE入组者的样本,并使用描述性分析程序进行检查。总体结果并不一致。种族、民族和性别之间的不平等程度不一致。此外,在区域影响和社会经济地位方面也存在不平等。未来的研究建议包括进行定性或混合方法研究,以进一步解释南卡罗来纳州CTE项目的招生模式。解决南卡罗来纳不平等问题的实践意义包括改善性别和种族/民族教育工作者的代表性不足,建议公平审计,检查CTE项目中的机会和可用性,并鼓励所有教育工作者积极采用和推进原始研究中的公平议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial Potential of Sarang Semut Herbal Extract (Myrmecodia pendans) from Timor Against Staphylococcus aureus: An In Vitro Study Reviewer Acknowledgements for Global Journal of Health Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2024. Creatine Supplements: What the Research Says about How It Can Help Healthy Athletes Socio-Demographic Determinants of Quality of Life Among Aging Population in Thailand Incidence of Recurrent Low Back Pain as a Side Effect of Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Obese Versus Non-Obese Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1