Comparative study of Intraoperative Haemodynamics and recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in patients receiving General Anaesthesia

M. Kavya
{"title":"Comparative study of Intraoperative Haemodynamics and recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane in patients receiving General Anaesthesia","authors":"M. Kavya","doi":"10.26611/10151932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inhaled anesthetics used for general anaesthesia have a rapid onset and offset of action. The Induction and recovery depends on anaesthetic drug solubility, cardiac output and minute ventilation. Sevoflurane and desflurane have low blood gas partition coefficients, and therefore share the advantage of faster onset and recovery from anaesthesia when compared to other inhaled anesthetics. Hence, we designed this prospective randomized study to compare the intraoperative haemodynamic parameters and recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane. Methods: Sixty patients aged between 18-50 years belonging to ASA I and II scheduled for elective general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups to receive desflurane(group D) and sevoflurane(group S) for the maintenance of anaesthesia. Both groups were premedicated, pre oxygenated and induced with propofol. Muscle relaxation maintained with vecuronium. Desflurane and sevoflurane concentrations were adjusted according to entropy parameters and clinical variables like HR, NIBP, MAP and SPO2. Neuromuscular blockade reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Recovery characteristics assessed using modified Aldrete scoring. Results: The intraoperative haemodynamics was similar with both desflurane and sevoflurane, and was maintained within 20% of baseline values. However, early recovery characteristics were significantly better in group D. Time to eye opening was 6.63 + 2.17 min in group S versus 4.77 + 1.41 min in group D (P< 0.001). Time to Extubation was 8.03 + 2.54 min in group S and 5.93 + 1.44 min in group D (P < 0.001). Response to verbal commands was 8.77 + 3.01 min in group S and 6.97 + 1.67 min in group D (P < 0.001). Modified Aldrete score were significantly better in group D than group S at 1st min, 2nd min and 3rd min. Thereafter, modified Aldrete score assessed at 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 min were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Both desflurane and sevoflurane produce similar stable haemodynamic profile. Despite the faster early recovery with desflurane, no significant differences were found between the two volatile anaesthetics after 5 minutes during intermediate recovery period.","PeriodicalId":18595,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10151932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inhaled anesthetics used for general anaesthesia have a rapid onset and offset of action. The Induction and recovery depends on anaesthetic drug solubility, cardiac output and minute ventilation. Sevoflurane and desflurane have low blood gas partition coefficients, and therefore share the advantage of faster onset and recovery from anaesthesia when compared to other inhaled anesthetics. Hence, we designed this prospective randomized study to compare the intraoperative haemodynamic parameters and recovery characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane. Methods: Sixty patients aged between 18-50 years belonging to ASA I and II scheduled for elective general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups to receive desflurane(group D) and sevoflurane(group S) for the maintenance of anaesthesia. Both groups were premedicated, pre oxygenated and induced with propofol. Muscle relaxation maintained with vecuronium. Desflurane and sevoflurane concentrations were adjusted according to entropy parameters and clinical variables like HR, NIBP, MAP and SPO2. Neuromuscular blockade reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Recovery characteristics assessed using modified Aldrete scoring. Results: The intraoperative haemodynamics was similar with both desflurane and sevoflurane, and was maintained within 20% of baseline values. However, early recovery characteristics were significantly better in group D. Time to eye opening was 6.63 + 2.17 min in group S versus 4.77 + 1.41 min in group D (P< 0.001). Time to Extubation was 8.03 + 2.54 min in group S and 5.93 + 1.44 min in group D (P < 0.001). Response to verbal commands was 8.77 + 3.01 min in group S and 6.97 + 1.67 min in group D (P < 0.001). Modified Aldrete score were significantly better in group D than group S at 1st min, 2nd min and 3rd min. Thereafter, modified Aldrete score assessed at 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 min were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Both desflurane and sevoflurane produce similar stable haemodynamic profile. Despite the faster early recovery with desflurane, no significant differences were found between the two volatile anaesthetics after 5 minutes during intermediate recovery period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地氟醚与七氟醚在全麻患者术中血流动力学及恢复特征的比较研究
背景:用于全身麻醉的吸入麻醉药起效快且作用偏移。诱导和恢复取决于麻醉药物的溶解度、心输出量和分钟通气量。七氟醚和地氟醚具有较低的血气分割系数,因此与其他吸入麻醉剂相比,具有更快起效和恢复的优点。因此,我们设计了这项前瞻性随机研究,比较地氟醚和七氟醚的术中血流动力学参数和恢复特征。方法:选取60例年龄在18 ~ 50岁,属于ASA I、II级的择期全麻患者,随机分为两组,分别给予地氟醚(D组)和七氟醚(S组)维持麻醉。两组均给予预用药、预充氧和异丙酚诱导。维库溴铵维持肌肉松弛。根据熵参数及HR、NIBP、MAP、SPO2等临床变量调整地氟醚和七氟醚浓度。新斯的明和甘芦酸酯可逆转神经肌肉阻滞。采用改进的Aldrete评分法评估恢复特征。结果:地氟醚和七氟醚的术中血流动力学相似,维持在基线值的20%以内。D组早期恢复特征明显优于S组,S组睁眼时间为6.63 + 2.17 min, D组为4.77 + 1.41 min (P< 0.001)。拔管时间S组为8.03 + 2.54 min, D组为5.93 + 1.44 min (P < 0.001)。S组对口头命令的反应时间为8.77 + 3.01 min, D组为6.97 + 1.67 min (P < 0.001)。D组改良Aldrete评分在第1分钟、第2分钟、第3分钟明显优于S组,此后5、10、15、30、60分钟两组改良Aldrete评分相近。结论:地氟醚和七氟醚具有相似的稳定血流动力学特征。尽管地氟醚的早期恢复更快,但在中期恢复5分钟后,两种挥发性麻醉剂之间没有显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of sedation levels and adverse effects axillary brachial plexus block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine Efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation A comparative study of different types of video laryngoscopes in viewing ease and time of Intubation and laryngoscopic response A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia A comparative study of supreme laryngeal mask airway versus laryngeal tube undergoing general anesthesia in short surgical procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1