Diametral tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cements with modified powder ratio for uses in atraumatic restorative treatment

Fernanda Souza Vieira, Roberta Pinto Pereira, S. X. S. Costa, D. Figueiredo
{"title":"Diametral tensile strength of conventional glass ionomer cements with modified powder ratio for uses in atraumatic restorative treatment","authors":"Fernanda Souza Vieira, Roberta Pinto Pereira, S. X. S. Costa, D. Figueiredo","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372022001320200107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the diametral tensile strength of Brazilian brands of conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC) when modified powder ratio in their composition compared to each other, and with high viscosity glass ionomer cement for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Methods: Experimental study with five groups (n=10 each) and specimens (2.5 mm in height and 5.0 mm in diameter), considering G1 (Maxxion R-MR), G2 (Vidrion R-VR) and G3 Vitro molar (VM-control) according to manufacturer recommending powder/liquid (1:1), G4 (MR) and G5 (VR) plus powder (2:1). The specimens were stored in an oven at 37 ± 1 ° C for 1 day. Diametral Tensile Test was performed by the Instron model 4444. Means differences were tested by Student´s T-Test (α = 5%). Results: There significant differences were in the means (standard deviation) of diametral tensile strength of MR (1:1) 4.24 (±1.47) and MR (2:1), 5.74 (±1.51) (p=0.039) and VR (1:1) 4.50 (±1.27) and VR (2:1) 6.20 (±1.89) (p=0.029). When comparing MR and VR (2:1) with MV (1:1) 4.82 (±1.17), VR 2: 1, 6.20 (±1.89) showed significant differences (p=0.0336). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in the means of diametral tensile strength of Brazilian brands conventional GICs when powder increment, approaching the performance observed by the high viscosity GIC.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022001320200107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the diametral tensile strength of Brazilian brands of conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC) when modified powder ratio in their composition compared to each other, and with high viscosity glass ionomer cement for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Methods: Experimental study with five groups (n=10 each) and specimens (2.5 mm in height and 5.0 mm in diameter), considering G1 (Maxxion R-MR), G2 (Vidrion R-VR) and G3 Vitro molar (VM-control) according to manufacturer recommending powder/liquid (1:1), G4 (MR) and G5 (VR) plus powder (2:1). The specimens were stored in an oven at 37 ± 1 ° C for 1 day. Diametral Tensile Test was performed by the Instron model 4444. Means differences were tested by Student´s T-Test (α = 5%). Results: There significant differences were in the means (standard deviation) of diametral tensile strength of MR (1:1) 4.24 (±1.47) and MR (2:1), 5.74 (±1.51) (p=0.039) and VR (1:1) 4.50 (±1.27) and VR (2:1) 6.20 (±1.89) (p=0.029). When comparing MR and VR (2:1) with MV (1:1) 4.82 (±1.17), VR 2: 1, 6.20 (±1.89) showed significant differences (p=0.0336). Conclusion: There was a significant increase in the means of diametral tensile strength of Brazilian brands conventional GICs when powder increment, approaching the performance observed by the high viscosity GIC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良粉比常规玻璃离子水门合剂在非创伤性修复中的直径抗拉强度
【摘要】目的:研究巴西品牌常规玻璃离子水门合剂(GIC)在其组成中修改粉比时的直径抗拉强度,并与高粘度玻璃离子水门合剂进行非创伤修复治疗(ART)的比较。方法:实验研究分为5组(每组10人)和标本(高2.5 mm,直径5.0 mm), G1 (Maxxion R-MR), G2 (Vidrion R-VR)和G3体外磨牙(vm -对照),按厂家推荐的粉液比1:1,G4 (MR)和G5 (VR)加粉(2:1)。标本在37±1℃的烘箱中保存1天。直径拉伸试验采用Instron 4444模型。均值差异采用Student’st检验(α = 5%)。结果:MR(1:1) 4.24(±1.47)、MR(2:1) 5.74(±1.51)(p=0.039)、VR(1:1) 4.50(±1.27)、VR(2:1) 6.20(±1.89)(p=0.029)的直径抗拉强度均值(标准差)有显著性差异。MR、VR(2:1)与MV(1:1)(4.82(±1.17)、VR(2:1)(6.20(±1.89))比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.0336)。结论:巴西品牌常规GIC的直径抗拉强度随粉末的增加而显著增加,接近高粘度GIC的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sleep disorders are associated with both morning temporal and jaw pain among adults and elderly: a population-based study in Brazil Radiolucent image in lower third molar: hidden caries or pre-eruptive resorption?: a case report Edentulism and number of medications are associated with nutritional status in older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study Fluoride in Mozambique: retrospective study Evidence-practice gap in treatment recommendations for proximal caries among Brazilian dentists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1