A Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Vortex-Induced Motion of a Deep-Draft Semi-Submersible

Hyunchul Jang, Dae-Hyun Kim, M. Agrawal, Sébastien Loubeyre, Dongwhan Lee, Jerry Huang, Y. Law, A. Magee, A. Koop
{"title":"A Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Vortex-Induced Motion of a Deep-Draft Semi-Submersible","authors":"Hyunchul Jang, Dae-Hyun Kim, M. Agrawal, Sébastien Loubeyre, Dongwhan Lee, Jerry Huang, Y. Law, A. Magee, A. Koop","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-63785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Platform Vortex Induced Motion (VIM) is an important cause of fatigue damage on risers and mooring lines connected to deep-draft semi-submersible floating platforms. The VIM design criteria have been typically obtained from towing tank model testing. Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been used to assess the VIM response and to augment the understanding of physical model test results. A joint industry effort has been conducted for developing and verifying a CFD modeling practice for the semi-submersible VIM through a working group of the Reproducible Offshore CFD JIP. The objectives of the working group are to write a CFD modeling practice document based on existing practices validated for model test data, and to verify the written practice by blind calculations with five CFD practitioners acting as verifiers.\n This paper presents the working group’s verification process, consisting of two stages. In the initial verification stage, the verifiers independently performed free-decay tests for 3-DOF motions (surge, sway, yaw) to check if the mechanical system in the CFD model is the same as in the benchmark test. Additionally, VIM simulations were conducted at two current headings with a reduced velocity within the lock-in range, where large sway motion responses are expected,. In the final verification stage, the verifiers performed a complete set of test cases with small revisions of their CFD models based on the results from the initial verification. The VIM responses from these blind calculations are presented, showing close agreement with the model test data.","PeriodicalId":23502,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-63785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Platform Vortex Induced Motion (VIM) is an important cause of fatigue damage on risers and mooring lines connected to deep-draft semi-submersible floating platforms. The VIM design criteria have been typically obtained from towing tank model testing. Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been used to assess the VIM response and to augment the understanding of physical model test results. A joint industry effort has been conducted for developing and verifying a CFD modeling practice for the semi-submersible VIM through a working group of the Reproducible Offshore CFD JIP. The objectives of the working group are to write a CFD modeling practice document based on existing practices validated for model test data, and to verify the written practice by blind calculations with five CFD practitioners acting as verifiers. This paper presents the working group’s verification process, consisting of two stages. In the initial verification stage, the verifiers independently performed free-decay tests for 3-DOF motions (surge, sway, yaw) to check if the mechanical system in the CFD model is the same as in the benchmark test. Additionally, VIM simulations were conducted at two current headings with a reduced velocity within the lock-in range, where large sway motion responses are expected,. In the final verification stage, the verifiers performed a complete set of test cases with small revisions of their CFD models based on the results from the initial verification. The VIM responses from these blind calculations are presented, showing close agreement with the model test data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证深吃水半潜式船涡致运动的CFD建模实践
平台涡激运动是造成深吃水半潜式浮式平台隔水管和系缆疲劳损伤的重要原因。VIM设计标准通常是从拖曳舱模型试验中获得的。最近,计算流体力学(CFD)分析已被用于评估VIM响应,并增加对物理模型测试结果的理解。业界联合开展了一项工作,通过可再生海上CFD JIP工作组,开发并验证了半潜式VIM的CFD建模实践。工作组的目标是根据模型测试数据验证的现有实践编写CFD建模实践文档,并通过五名CFD从业者作为验证者的盲计算来验证书面实践。本文介绍了工作组的验证过程,包括两个阶段。在初始验证阶段,验证者独立进行了三自由度运动(浪涌、摇摆、偏航)的自由衰减测试,以检查CFD模型中的机械系统是否与基准测试中的机械系统相同。此外,在锁定范围内的两个当前航向下进行了VIM模拟,其中速度降低,预计会产生较大的摇摆运动响应。在最后的验证阶段,验证者执行了一套完整的测试用例,并基于初始验证的结果对他们的CFD模型进行了小的修订。给出了这些盲计算的VIM响应,显示出与模型试验数据的密切一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of the Inertial Components in Modal State Covariances Prelude FLNG Free Weathervaning Heading Prediction and Uncertainties, Based on Machine Learning Model Applying Open Web Architectures Towards Collaborative Maritime Design and Simulation Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Predicting Wave Impact Dynamic Response of a Generic Self-Elevating Unit in Operation With Hull in Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1