PLANNED HOME BIRTH: A REVIEW

T. Serdinšek, I. Takač
{"title":"PLANNED HOME BIRTH: A REVIEW","authors":"T. Serdinšek, I. Takač","doi":"10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Home birth is as old as humanity, but still most middle- and high-income countries consider hospitals as the safest birth settings, as complications regarding birth are highly unpredictable. Despite this there are a few countries in which home birth in integrated into official healthcare system (the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Canada etc.). Home births can be divided into unplanned and planned, and the latter can be further categorized by the presence of the birth attendants. This review focuses on planned home births, which are differently represented throughout the world. In the United States 0.6-1.0% of all children are born at home, in the United Kingdom 2-3%, in Canada 1.6% and in the Netherlands 20-30%. For Slovenia, the number of planned home births is unknown; however, in 2010 0.1% of children were born outside medical facilities. Conclusions: The safety of home birth in still under the debate. While research confirms smaller number of obstetric interventions and some complications in mothers who give birth at home, the data regarding the neonatal and perinatal mortality and morbidity is still conflicting. This confirms the need for large multicentric trials in this field. Current home birth guidelines emphasize that women should be well informed regarding the possible advantages and disadvantages of home births. In addition, the emphasis is on definition of selection criteria for home birth, indications for intrapartal transfer to the hospital and appropriate education of birth attendants.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"140 1","pages":"213-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Home birth is as old as humanity, but still most middle- and high-income countries consider hospitals as the safest birth settings, as complications regarding birth are highly unpredictable. Despite this there are a few countries in which home birth in integrated into official healthcare system (the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Canada etc.). Home births can be divided into unplanned and planned, and the latter can be further categorized by the presence of the birth attendants. This review focuses on planned home births, which are differently represented throughout the world. In the United States 0.6-1.0% of all children are born at home, in the United Kingdom 2-3%, in Canada 1.6% and in the Netherlands 20-30%. For Slovenia, the number of planned home births is unknown; however, in 2010 0.1% of children were born outside medical facilities. Conclusions: The safety of home birth in still under the debate. While research confirms smaller number of obstetric interventions and some complications in mothers who give birth at home, the data regarding the neonatal and perinatal mortality and morbidity is still conflicting. This confirms the need for large multicentric trials in this field. Current home birth guidelines emphasize that women should be well informed regarding the possible advantages and disadvantages of home births. In addition, the emphasis is on definition of selection criteria for home birth, indications for intrapartal transfer to the hospital and appropriate education of birth attendants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭计划生育:回顾
背景:家庭分娩与人类一样古老,但大多数中等收入和高收入国家仍然认为医院是最安全的分娩场所,因为分娩并发症是高度不可预测的。尽管如此,仍有少数国家将家庭分娩纳入官方医疗保健系统(荷兰、英国、加拿大等)。家中分娩可分为计划外分娩和计划分娩,计划外分娩可根据助产人员的在场情况进一步分类。本综述的重点是计划生育,这在世界各地有不同的代表性。在美国,0.6% -1.0%的孩子是在家里出生的,在英国是2% -3%,在加拿大是1.6%,在荷兰是20% -30%。在斯洛文尼亚,计划在家分娩的人数不详;然而,2010年,0.1%的儿童出生在医疗设施之外。结论:在家分娩的安全性仍存在争议。虽然研究证实,在家分娩的母亲进行产科干预的人数较少,而且出现了一些并发症,但有关新生儿和围产期死亡率和发病率的数据仍然相互矛盾。这证实了在该领域进行大型多中心试验的必要性。目前的在家分娩指导方针强调,妇女应该充分了解在家分娩可能的利弊。此外,重点是确定在家分娩的选择标准、分娩时转院的指征以及对接生员的适当教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy of an aerosol box to prevent infections during aerosol-generating procedures Sialendoscopy before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic THE EFFECT OF SARTANS ON THE PREGNANCY PARAVAGINAL AND RETROPERITONEAL HAEMATOMA POST PARTUM Iatrogenic streptococcus salivarius meningitis: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1