In the Castle of My Skin: (Re)Inscribing an African “Feminist” Identity in Changes and Faceless

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.25.3.0271
Grace Danquah
{"title":"In the Castle of My Skin: (Re)Inscribing an African “Feminist” Identity in Changes and Faceless","authors":"Grace Danquah","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.3.0271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The analysis of African feminism in literary works is now a well-established area in literature. Most of the research on Changes and Faceless focuses on a thematic or stylistic study of the text. An often-underexplored area is how these two authors utilize the element of characterization to (re)inscribe the boundaries of African-centered feminist identities. To fill this gap, this article comparatively analyses the portrayal of “feminist” identity in Aidoo’s Changes (1994) and Darko’s Faceless (2003). The article reaffirms the stance assumed by Nigerian theorists like Nnaemeka, Ogundipe-Leslie, and Akachi that the feminist in Africa is accommodative, compromising, and collaborative. Using negofeminism (No ego feminism) theory as an analytical framework, this article reveals that in Faceless, the female characters who survive and thrive are those who live out the very tenets of the theory. In Changes, Esi is isolated in the end because she chose individualism over communalism. Consequently, this article extends the scholarship on literary representation of African feminism in women-authored novels. This validates the conclusion that African feminism as portrayed by Aidoo and Darko is truly representative of indigenous societies.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.3.0271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The analysis of African feminism in literary works is now a well-established area in literature. Most of the research on Changes and Faceless focuses on a thematic or stylistic study of the text. An often-underexplored area is how these two authors utilize the element of characterization to (re)inscribe the boundaries of African-centered feminist identities. To fill this gap, this article comparatively analyses the portrayal of “feminist” identity in Aidoo’s Changes (1994) and Darko’s Faceless (2003). The article reaffirms the stance assumed by Nigerian theorists like Nnaemeka, Ogundipe-Leslie, and Akachi that the feminist in Africa is accommodative, compromising, and collaborative. Using negofeminism (No ego feminism) theory as an analytical framework, this article reveals that in Faceless, the female characters who survive and thrive are those who live out the very tenets of the theory. In Changes, Esi is isolated in the end because she chose individualism over communalism. Consequently, this article extends the scholarship on literary representation of African feminism in women-authored novels. This validates the conclusion that African feminism as portrayed by Aidoo and Darko is truly representative of indigenous societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在我皮肤的城堡里:(再)在《变化与无面》中刻下非洲“女权主义者”的身份
对文学作品中非洲女性主义的分析是目前文学研究的一个成熟领域。对《变与无面》的研究大多集中在对文本的主题或风格研究上。一个经常被忽视的领域是,这两位作者如何利用人物塑造的元素来(重新)界定以非洲为中心的女权主义身份的界限。为了填补这一空白,本文对比分析了Aidoo的《变化》(1994)和Darko的《无面者》(2003)对“女权主义者”身份的刻画。这篇文章重申了尼日利亚理论家如Nnaemeka、Ogundipe-Leslie和Akachi的立场,即非洲的女权主义是包容、妥协和合作的。本文以“无我女性主义”理论为分析框架,揭示了在《无面者》中,能够生存和发展的女性角色正是那些实践了该理论原则的人。在《变化》中,Esi最终被孤立,因为她选择了个人主义而不是社群主义。因此,本文拓展了非洲女性主义在女性小说中的文学表现研究。这证实了Aidoo和Darko所描绘的非洲女权主义真正代表了土著社会的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Retransmission of Culture through Literary Translation: Turkish–Ukrainian Interliterary Contact In the Castle of My Skin: (Re)Inscribing an African “Feminist” Identity in Changes and Faceless A Theory for Cultural Resistance: The Cases of L. M. Silko’s Ceremony and L. Erdrich’s Tracks Disjuncture as a Trope of Conjuncture in Sudeep Pakhrin’s Selected Poems Dostoevsky’s Philosophy: A Critical Overview of Its Interpretations and a Definition of Its Contradiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1