Constructing “Kin” Citizens: An Investigation of Canadian Kinesiology Programs’ Mission and Vision Statements

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quest Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1080/00336297.2022.2101495
Sarah Barnes, Yuka Nakamura, P. Safai
{"title":"Constructing “Kin” Citizens: An Investigation of Canadian Kinesiology Programs’ Mission and Vision Statements","authors":"Sarah Barnes, Yuka Nakamura, P. Safai","doi":"10.1080/00336297.2022.2101495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to explore how social forces related to the corporatization of universities play out at the granular level of institutional mission and vision statements in the racialized context of Canadian Kinesiology. The stated aims of Canadian Kinesiology academic units (N = 36) were collected from their public-facing websites, and we conducted a critical discourses analysis of our evidence. We argue that mission and vision statements construct Kinesiology as an altruistic and impactful scholarly project and conceal the contested nature of health, scientific knowledge, and community engagement in the field. Careful analysis of the data, with particular attention paid to that which is unspoken, silenced or erased, highlights how these guiding declarations can renew the field’s underlying racial and colonial logics. To conclude, we note instances when programs use institutional statements to unsettle dominant scripts and open possibilities to work toward a more progressive and just Kinesiology.","PeriodicalId":49642,"journal":{"name":"Quest","volume":"12 1","pages":"344 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2101495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to explore how social forces related to the corporatization of universities play out at the granular level of institutional mission and vision statements in the racialized context of Canadian Kinesiology. The stated aims of Canadian Kinesiology academic units (N = 36) were collected from their public-facing websites, and we conducted a critical discourses analysis of our evidence. We argue that mission and vision statements construct Kinesiology as an altruistic and impactful scholarly project and conceal the contested nature of health, scientific knowledge, and community engagement in the field. Careful analysis of the data, with particular attention paid to that which is unspoken, silenced or erased, highlights how these guiding declarations can renew the field’s underlying racial and colonial logics. To conclude, we note instances when programs use institutional statements to unsettle dominant scripts and open possibilities to work toward a more progressive and just Kinesiology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建构“Kin”公民:加拿大运动机能学专业使命与愿景陈述之调查
本文的目的是探讨在加拿大运动机能学的种族化背景下,与大学公司化相关的社会力量如何在机构使命和愿景声明的颗粒水平上发挥作用。加拿大运动机能学学术单位(N = 36)的既定目标从其面向公众的网站上收集,我们对我们的证据进行了批判性话语分析。我们认为,使命和愿景陈述将运动机能学构建为一门利他主义和有影响力的学术项目,并掩盖了该领域健康、科学知识和社区参与的争议性。仔细分析这些数据,特别注意那些未说出口的、沉默的或被抹去的数据,突出表明这些指导性宣言如何能够更新该领域潜在的种族和殖民逻辑。综上所述,我们注意到一些例子,当程序使用机构声明来扰乱主导脚本,并打开朝着更进步和公正的运动机能学工作的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quest
Quest 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today. Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.
期刊最新文献
Get it Together PETE: Utilizing Geographic Diversity to Provide Students New Collaborations Social Justice as a Force to Challenge the Status Quo Across Youth Sport Scholarship: A Letter to Academia To Standard or Not to Standard in Physical Education? That is the Question Nurturing Football Talent: A Conceptual Framework for Talent Development Environment Valuable Diversity or Pathological Problem?: A Comparative Thematic Analysis of Self-Advocate and Adapted Physical Activity Teachings About Autism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1