The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Method on Science Learning Outcomes in Grade V Students of SD Negeri 1 Amparita

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.37329/ijms.v1i2.2336
Ni Wayan, Sariani Binawati
{"title":"The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Method on Science Learning Outcomes in Grade V Students of SD Negeri 1 Amparita","authors":"Ni Wayan, Sariani Binawati","doi":"10.37329/ijms.v1i2.2336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning is still centered on the teacher so that students are still passive. Lack of teacher attention to the potential of students in terms of group cooperation, building their own knowledge by collecting data or hypothesizing and less involved in activities that are fun and move children's motoric. This is because the teacher has not used innovative learning methods so that it causes low student learning outcomes, so research is needed to test this. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of guided inquiry learning method on science learning outcomes of grade V students of UPT SD Negeri 1 Amparita, Sidrap Regency. This research approach is quantitative with experimental type. This study consists of two variables, namely the guided inquiry learning method as the independent variable and science learning outcomes as the dependent variable, with a research design of Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The population used was all grade V students, namely class Va as an experimental class with 27 students and class Vb as a control class with 26 students without being randomized. The data obtained were analyzed with descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The results of descriptive analysis showed that the increase in the average value of science learning outcomes of the experimental class was higher than the average science learning outcomes of the control class. The t-test analysis using the Paired Samples T-Test test shows that the significance value of 0.000 is smaller than α = 0.05 and the t-count is greater than the t-table, thus H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It can be concluded that the guided inquiry learning method has an effect on science learning outcomes about the human respiratory system in class V UPT SD Negeri 1 Amparita Sidrap Regency.","PeriodicalId":43006,"journal":{"name":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences-RIMCIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/ijms.v1i2.2336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning is still centered on the teacher so that students are still passive. Lack of teacher attention to the potential of students in terms of group cooperation, building their own knowledge by collecting data or hypothesizing and less involved in activities that are fun and move children's motoric. This is because the teacher has not used innovative learning methods so that it causes low student learning outcomes, so research is needed to test this. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of guided inquiry learning method on science learning outcomes of grade V students of UPT SD Negeri 1 Amparita, Sidrap Regency. This research approach is quantitative with experimental type. This study consists of two variables, namely the guided inquiry learning method as the independent variable and science learning outcomes as the dependent variable, with a research design of Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The population used was all grade V students, namely class Va as an experimental class with 27 students and class Vb as a control class with 26 students without being randomized. The data obtained were analyzed with descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The results of descriptive analysis showed that the increase in the average value of science learning outcomes of the experimental class was higher than the average science learning outcomes of the control class. The t-test analysis using the Paired Samples T-Test test shows that the significance value of 0.000 is smaller than α = 0.05 and the t-count is greater than the t-table, thus H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It can be concluded that the guided inquiry learning method has an effect on science learning outcomes about the human respiratory system in class V UPT SD Negeri 1 Amparita Sidrap Regency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导性研究性学习方法对小学五年级学生科学学习成果的影响
学习仍然以老师为中心,使学生仍然是被动的。教师缺乏对学生在小组合作方面的潜力的关注,通过收集数据或假设来建立自己的知识,较少参与有趣的活动和运动儿童的运动。这是因为教师没有使用创新的学习方法,导致学生的学习效果很低,所以需要研究来验证。本研究的目的是确定指导性研究性学习方法对UPT五年级学生科学学习成果的影响。本研究方法为定量实验型。本研究包括两个变量,即指导性研究性学习方法为自变量,科学学习成果为因变量,研究设计为非等效对照组设计。使用的人群均为五年级学生,即Va班为实验班27人,Vb班为对照班26人,未进行随机化。所得资料采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析。描述性分析结果显示,实验班学生科学学习成果平均值的增幅高于对照组学生科学学习成果平均值的增幅。采用配对样本t检验进行t检验分析,结果表明,显著性值0.000小于α = 0.05, t计数大于t表,因此拒绝H0,接受H1。由此可见,引导研究性学习方法对UPT SD Negeri 1 Amparita Sidrap Regency V班人体呼吸系统科学学习效果有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Harmonization Between Humans and Animals Particularly the Balinese Dog Race in Bali Ethics And Social Procedures In Lontara Pappaseng As A Guideline And Philosophy Of Life Of Buginese Society In South Sulawesi Hindu Religious Ethics Values and Tolerance In Darmakaya's Gaguritan An Analysis of Differences in Online and Offline Learning at Mahardika Elementary School of Denpasar Humanist, Pluralist, and Dialogical Concepts in Hindu Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1