Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) adapted for HIV: Psychometric properties, sensitivity & specificity in depressive episodes, adjustment disorder & without symptomatology

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Salud Mental Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.037
V. Rodríguez-Pérez, Alicia Piñeirua Menéndez, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, José Antonio Mata Marín
{"title":"Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) adapted for HIV: Psychometric properties, sensitivity & specificity in depressive episodes, adjustment disorder & without symptomatology","authors":"V. Rodríguez-Pérez, Alicia Piñeirua Menéndez, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, José Antonio Mata Marín","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) is the most widely used instrument for assessing depression symptoms. Although it has been validated in the Mexican population, it has not been tested in people living with HIV (PLWH), who tend to have symptoms difficult to distinguish from those associated with viral infection. Objective. We obtained the psychometric properties, sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points to distinguish between a depressive episode, adjustment disorder and no symptoms. Method. Prospective study with 2,022 PLWH (88% men), who completed the BDI-IA between 2016 and 2017. Subjects had a mean age of 31.9 ± 9.3 years, with 12.0 ± 5.6 years of schooling, and 4.5 ± 4.3 years since diagnosis. The differentiation of items, internal consistency, factor analysis, and calculation of sensitivity and specificity were tested. Results. A Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .91 was obtained. Through factorial analysis with orthogonal rotation (average intercorrelations r = .40, KMO .929), we obtained three factors: general factor of depression, somatic, and cognition, which explained 39.7%, 6.01%, and 5.49% of the variance, respectively. Only the items in the first factor (the short version with 12 items) were tested. With a cut-off point of 11, it had 85.5% sensitivity and 76% specificity [(AUC) = .865, 95% CI [.83, .90], p ≤ .001], and distinguished major depressive disorder from cases without mental symptoms. Discussion and conclusion. We show that the short version of the BDI-IA is reliable, valid, sensitive, and specific for evaluating depression symptoms comorbid with HIV infection.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) is the most widely used instrument for assessing depression symptoms. Although it has been validated in the Mexican population, it has not been tested in people living with HIV (PLWH), who tend to have symptoms difficult to distinguish from those associated with viral infection. Objective. We obtained the psychometric properties, sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off points to distinguish between a depressive episode, adjustment disorder and no symptoms. Method. Prospective study with 2,022 PLWH (88% men), who completed the BDI-IA between 2016 and 2017. Subjects had a mean age of 31.9 ± 9.3 years, with 12.0 ± 5.6 years of schooling, and 4.5 ± 4.3 years since diagnosis. The differentiation of items, internal consistency, factor analysis, and calculation of sensitivity and specificity were tested. Results. A Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of .91 was obtained. Through factorial analysis with orthogonal rotation (average intercorrelations r = .40, KMO .929), we obtained three factors: general factor of depression, somatic, and cognition, which explained 39.7%, 6.01%, and 5.49% of the variance, respectively. Only the items in the first factor (the short version with 12 items) were tested. With a cut-off point of 11, it had 85.5% sensitivity and 76% specificity [(AUC) = .865, 95% CI [.83, .90], p ≤ .001], and distinguished major depressive disorder from cases without mental symptoms. Discussion and conclusion. We show that the short version of the BDI-IA is reliable, valid, sensitive, and specific for evaluating depression symptoms comorbid with HIV infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝克抑郁量表(BDI-IA)适用于HIV:抑郁发作的心理测量特性,敏感性和特异性,适应障碍和无症状
介绍。贝克抑郁量表(BDI-IA)是最广泛使用的抑郁症状评估工具。虽然它已在墨西哥人群中得到验证,但尚未在艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)中进行测试,这些人的症状往往难以与病毒感染相关的症状区分开来。目标。我们获得了心理测量特性、敏感性、特异性和分界点,以区分抑郁发作、适应障碍和无症状。方法。2016年至2017年期间完成BDI-IA的2,022名PLWH(88%为男性)的前瞻性研究。受试者平均年龄为31.9±9.3岁,受教育年限为12.0±5.6年,自诊断以来为4.5±4.3年。检验项目区分、内部一致性、因子分析、敏感性和特异性计算。结果。Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.91。通过正交旋转析因分析(平均相关系数r = 0.40, KMO = 0.929),得到抑郁一般因素、躯体因素和认知因素3个因素,分别解释39.7%、6.01%和5.49%的方差。只测试了第一个因素中的项目(包含12个项目的简短版本)。截断点为11,敏感性为85.5%,特异性为76% [(AUC) = 0.865, 95% CI]。[83, .90], p≤.001],并将重性抑郁症与无精神症状的患者区分开来。讨论与结论。我们表明,短版本的BDI-IA是可靠的,有效的,敏感的,特异性的评估抑郁症状与HIV感染合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of suicide mortality in Mexican young people (ages 15-29) from 1990 to 2020 Mexico at the United Nations: A step forward for mental health Clinical practice stressors and anxiety in nursing students during COVID-19 Emotional distress and self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic in women from an indigenous migrant cultural collective in Mexico City Is there interest of Mexican adults in being prepared should they develop Alzheimer’s or other dementia?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1