Ayaka Noda, Sounghee Kim, Angela Yung Chi Hou, I-Jung Grace Lu, Hua-Chi Chou
{"title":"The relationships between internal quality assurance and learning outcome assessments: challenges confronting universities in Japan and Taiwan","authors":"Ayaka Noda, Sounghee Kim, Angela Yung Chi Hou, I-Jung Grace Lu, Hua-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1080/13538322.2020.1838406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study probes the execution of internal quality assurance vis-à-vis learning outcome assessments in Japanese and Taiwanese universities. To this end, it applies Elken and Stensaker’s theoretical framework of ‘quality work’ to ascertain the following: (1) how universities build internal quality assurance; (2) what learning outcome assessments are embedded in internal quality assurance mechanisms; (3) how universities perceive internal quality assurance in relation to learning outcome assessments. Both nations offer shared perspectives on the correlations between internal quality assurance and learning outcome assessments: (i) tasks are simultaneously performed; (ii) internal quality assurance is the purpose and learning outcome assessment is a means to achieve it; (iii) the two tasks are decoupled. However, only Japan evinces the internal quality assurance as supply (assessment) and demand (outcomes). The finding initiates discourse on the purpose of internal quality assurance and cautions against their construction solely in response to external requirements.","PeriodicalId":46354,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1838406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study probes the execution of internal quality assurance vis-à-vis learning outcome assessments in Japanese and Taiwanese universities. To this end, it applies Elken and Stensaker’s theoretical framework of ‘quality work’ to ascertain the following: (1) how universities build internal quality assurance; (2) what learning outcome assessments are embedded in internal quality assurance mechanisms; (3) how universities perceive internal quality assurance in relation to learning outcome assessments. Both nations offer shared perspectives on the correlations between internal quality assurance and learning outcome assessments: (i) tasks are simultaneously performed; (ii) internal quality assurance is the purpose and learning outcome assessment is a means to achieve it; (iii) the two tasks are decoupled. However, only Japan evinces the internal quality assurance as supply (assessment) and demand (outcomes). The finding initiates discourse on the purpose of internal quality assurance and cautions against their construction solely in response to external requirements.
期刊介绍:
Quality in Higher Education is aimed at those interested in the theory, practice and policies relating to the control, management and improvement of quality in higher education. The journal is receptive to critical, phenomenological as well as positivistic studies. The journal would like to publish more studies that use hermeneutic, semiotic, ethnographic or dialectical research as well as the more traditional studies based on quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews and focus groups. Papers that have empirical research content are particularly welcome. The editor especially wishes to encourage papers on: reported research results, especially where these assess the impact of quality assurance systems, procedures and methodologies; theoretical analyses of quality and quality initiatives in higher education; comparative evaluation and international aspects of practice and policy with a view to identifying transportable methods, systems and good practice; quality assurance and standards monitoring of transnational higher education; the nature and impact and student feedback; improvements in learning and teaching that impact on quality and standards; links between quality assurance and employability; evaluations of the impact of quality procedures at national level, backed up by research evidence.