Field evaluation of three biopesticides for integrated management of major pests of tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L. in Sudan

H. El-Shafie, B. Abdelraheem
{"title":"Field evaluation of three biopesticides for integrated management of major pests of tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L. in Sudan","authors":"H. El-Shafie, B. Abdelraheem","doi":"10.5251/ABJNA.2012.3.9.340.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field experiments were conducted at two different locations in Khartoum State, Sudan during the cropping season 2007/2008 to evaluate the efficacy of three biopesticides on the major insects of tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Treatments applied were NeemAzal ® -T/S (2L/ha), XenTari ® (1kg/ha), Spinosad ® (2L/ha). Sumicidin ® 20% EC was applied at a rate of 0.7L/ha for comparison. Major insect pests studied were whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; aphids, Aphis gossypii and African bollworm (ABW), Helicoverpa armigera. All treatments significantly reduced the populations of the test insect pests. NeemAzal proved to be nearly as effective as Sumicidin. Higher numbers of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) were found in biopesticidestreated and control plots compared with fewer numbers in Sumicidintreated plots. The per cent increase in yield was 32%, 31.2%, 25.3% and 20% in plots treated with NeemAzal, Sumicidin, Xen Tari and Spionsad respectively.","PeriodicalId":7409,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America","volume":"23 1","pages":"340-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5251/ABJNA.2012.3.9.340.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at two different locations in Khartoum State, Sudan during the cropping season 2007/2008 to evaluate the efficacy of three biopesticides on the major insects of tomato, (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Treatments applied were NeemAzal ® -T/S (2L/ha), XenTari ® (1kg/ha), Spinosad ® (2L/ha). Sumicidin ® 20% EC was applied at a rate of 0.7L/ha for comparison. Major insect pests studied were whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; aphids, Aphis gossypii and African bollworm (ABW), Helicoverpa armigera. All treatments significantly reduced the populations of the test insect pests. NeemAzal proved to be nearly as effective as Sumicidin. Higher numbers of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) were found in biopesticidestreated and control plots compared with fewer numbers in Sumicidintreated plots. The per cent increase in yield was 32%, 31.2%, 25.3% and 20% in plots treated with NeemAzal, Sumicidin, Xen Tari and Spionsad respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种生物农药在苏丹番茄主要害虫综合治理中的田间评价
2007/2008年种植季,在苏丹喀土穆州的两个不同地点进行了两项田间试验,以评价三种生物农药对番茄主要昆虫(茄类)的药效。采用NeemAzal®-T/S (2L/ha)、XenTari®(1kg/ha)、Spinosad®(2L/ha)处理。以0.7L/ha的剂量施用20% EC的Sumicidin®进行比较。研究的主要害虫有粉虱、烟粉虱;棉蚜、非洲棉铃虫、棉铃虫。所有处理均显著减少了试验害虫的数量。NeemAzal被证明几乎和Sumicidin一样有效。生物农药处理区和对照区绿草蛉的数量较多,而杀虫剂处理区数量较少。施用NeemAzal、Sumicidin、Xen Tari和Spionsad的地块增产幅度分别为32%、31.2%、25.3%和20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil fertility in land use for sustainable food crops production in the southern Côte d'Ivoire Effect of date fruits quantity on the numbers of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), captured in aggregation pheromone traps Utilization of banana peels for citric acid production by Aspergillus niger Comparative use of botanical oil extracts in pest management Improving potato tuber yields using genotypes with multiple virus resistance in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1