The PERSONS score: A new tool for cancer patients’ symptom assessment in simultaneous care and home care settings

A. Cortellini, G. Porzio, V. Cofini, S. Necozione, A. Parisi, F. Peris, G. Ravoni, G. Spinelli, E. Masel, A. Berghoff, C. Ficorella, L. Verna
{"title":"The PERSONS score: A new tool for cancer patients’ symptom assessment in simultaneous care and home care settings","authors":"A. Cortellini, G. Porzio, V. Cofini, S. Necozione, A. Parisi, F. Peris, G. Ravoni, G. Spinelli, E. Masel, A. Berghoff, C. Ficorella, L. Verna","doi":"10.1017/S1478951519000543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Scientific societies recommend early interaction between oncologic and supportive care, but there is still a lack of systematic evaluations regarding symptoms from the perspective of oncologists. Patients and methods The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the PERSONS score, in both “simultaneous care” and “supportive care” settings using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) as a comparator. Results From November 2017 to April 2018, 67 and 110 consecutive patients were enrolled in outpatient and home care cohorts, respectively. The final study population comprised 163 patients. There were no significant changes over time in the total PERSONS scores and total ESAS scale. The intra-interviewer reliability (ICC2,1) and inter-interviewer reliability (ICC2,k) showed good reproducibility (test-retest) in each group of patients: 0.60 (0.49–0.70) and 0.82 (0.75–0.87), respectively, for the home care patients and 0.73 (0.62–0.81) and 0.89 (0.83–0.93), respectively, for the outpatient cohort. There were high correlations between PERSONS and ESAS, both at the baseline and final assessments. The mean PERSONS and ESAS scores between the home care patients and outpatients were not different at the baseline and final assessments. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the PERSONS total score revealed good diagnostic ability. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.825 and 0.805 for improvement and deterioration, respectively. Conclusions The PERSONS score is an easy to apply tool for symptom assessment. Importantly, the PERSONS score showed high concordance with the established ESAS scale and, therefore, provides an alternative for everyday use in supportive care assessment.","PeriodicalId":19953,"journal":{"name":"Palliative and Supportive Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"33 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative and Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951519000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Background Scientific societies recommend early interaction between oncologic and supportive care, but there is still a lack of systematic evaluations regarding symptoms from the perspective of oncologists. Patients and methods The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the PERSONS score, in both “simultaneous care” and “supportive care” settings using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) as a comparator. Results From November 2017 to April 2018, 67 and 110 consecutive patients were enrolled in outpatient and home care cohorts, respectively. The final study population comprised 163 patients. There were no significant changes over time in the total PERSONS scores and total ESAS scale. The intra-interviewer reliability (ICC2,1) and inter-interviewer reliability (ICC2,k) showed good reproducibility (test-retest) in each group of patients: 0.60 (0.49–0.70) and 0.82 (0.75–0.87), respectively, for the home care patients and 0.73 (0.62–0.81) and 0.89 (0.83–0.93), respectively, for the outpatient cohort. There were high correlations between PERSONS and ESAS, both at the baseline and final assessments. The mean PERSONS and ESAS scores between the home care patients and outpatients were not different at the baseline and final assessments. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the PERSONS total score revealed good diagnostic ability. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.825 and 0.805 for improvement and deterioration, respectively. Conclusions The PERSONS score is an easy to apply tool for symptom assessment. Importantly, the PERSONS score showed high concordance with the established ESAS scale and, therefore, provides an alternative for everyday use in supportive care assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PERSONS评分:在同步护理和家庭护理环境中癌症患者症状评估的新工具
科学协会推荐肿瘤治疗和支持性治疗之间的早期互动,但仍然缺乏从肿瘤学家的角度对症状的系统评估。患者和方法本前瞻性研究的目的是使用埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)作为比较,在“同步治疗”和“支持治疗”两种情况下评估PERSONS评分。结果2017年11月至2018年4月,分别有67例和110例患者连续入组门诊和家庭护理队列。最终的研究人群包括163名患者。随着时间的推移,总PERSONS分数和总ESAS量表没有显著变化。访谈者内信度(ICC2,1)和访谈者间信度(ICC2,k)在每组患者中显示出良好的再现性(测试-再测试):家庭护理患者分别为0.60(0.49-0.70)和0.82(0.75-0.87),门诊队列分别为0.73(0.62-0.81)和0.89(0.83-0.93)。在基线和最终评估中,PERSONS和ESAS之间存在高度相关性。家庭护理患者和门诊患者的平均PERSONS和ESAS评分在基线和最终评估时没有差异。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的PERSONS总分显示较好的诊断能力。改善和恶化曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.825和0.805。结论PERSONS评分是一种简便易行的症状评估工具。重要的是,PERSONS评分与ESAS量表高度一致,因此为日常支持治疗评估提供了另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining public stigma and expectations of grief following medical aid and dying in the US: A vignette-based experiment. Bedbound. Shores of acceptance Light of the setting sun PAX volume 20 issue 6 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1