The Impact of Diversified Income and Agricultural Tax Reform on the Consumption of Chinese Rural Residents

Fangyuan Zhou, Xiaoqu Luo, Kandorera Angela Nujoma
{"title":"The Impact of Diversified Income and Agricultural Tax Reform on the Consumption of Chinese Rural Residents","authors":"Fangyuan Zhou, Xiaoqu Luo, Kandorera Angela Nujoma","doi":"10.22158/jepf.v8n4p75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Income from different sources has become an important guarantee to sustain family life and normal expenses in China. How different sources of income affect farmers’ expenditure levels and how they have influenced farmers’ consumption since the agricultural tax reform in China since the 20th century has become a question worth exploring. Panel data from 2016 to 2020 are utilized to examine rural residents’ consumption expenditures and their sources of disposable income by region to analyze the impact of different income sources on farmers’ consumption and the correlation between income before and after agricultural tax reform, and finally conducts an analysis of future scenarios based on a time series model. The research results show that the elasticity of income from different sources on rural households’ per capita consumption expenditure is different, among which wage income is the most elastic, while household business income has a relatively small effect on consumption expenditure, but through data analysis we can find that agricultural tax reform has a significant and continuous promotion effect on rural households’ per capita consumption expenditure. The continuous cycle of agricultural tax reform is long, and the transmission chain through less tax payment, expanded reproduction, harvest, realization, and then consumption is long, thus there is a certain lag in tax reduction effect. Income from such sources in the first three years has a large impact on the current period data, while the first four and five years have a relatively small impact on current business income.","PeriodicalId":73718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economics and public finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economics and public finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jepf.v8n4p75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Income from different sources has become an important guarantee to sustain family life and normal expenses in China. How different sources of income affect farmers’ expenditure levels and how they have influenced farmers’ consumption since the agricultural tax reform in China since the 20th century has become a question worth exploring. Panel data from 2016 to 2020 are utilized to examine rural residents’ consumption expenditures and their sources of disposable income by region to analyze the impact of different income sources on farmers’ consumption and the correlation between income before and after agricultural tax reform, and finally conducts an analysis of future scenarios based on a time series model. The research results show that the elasticity of income from different sources on rural households’ per capita consumption expenditure is different, among which wage income is the most elastic, while household business income has a relatively small effect on consumption expenditure, but through data analysis we can find that agricultural tax reform has a significant and continuous promotion effect on rural households’ per capita consumption expenditure. The continuous cycle of agricultural tax reform is long, and the transmission chain through less tax payment, expanded reproduction, harvest, realization, and then consumption is long, thus there is a certain lag in tax reduction effect. Income from such sources in the first three years has a large impact on the current period data, while the first four and five years have a relatively small impact on current business income.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元收入与农业税改革对中国农村居民消费的影响
在中国,各种来源的收入已成为维持家庭生活和正常开支的重要保障。20世纪以来中国农业税改革以来,不同的收入来源如何影响农民的支出水平,如何影响农民的消费,成为值得探讨的问题。利用2016 - 2020年的面板数据,对各地区农村居民的消费支出和可支配收入来源进行考察,分析不同收入来源对农民消费的影响以及农税改革前后收入的相关性,最后基于时间序列模型对未来情景进行分析。研究结果表明,不同来源收入对农户人均消费支出的弹性存在差异,其中工资性收入弹性最大,而农户经营收入对消费支出的影响相对较小,但通过数据分析可以发现,农业税改革对农户人均消费支出具有显著且持续的促进作用。农业税改革的连续周期较长,通过少交税、扩大再生产、收获、变现、再消费的传导链较长,因此减税效果存在一定滞后。这些来源的收入在前三年对当期数据的影响较大,而前四年和五年对当期营业收入的影响相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Nexus between Profitability, Dividend Policy and Share Prices in Kuwaiti Insurance Companies Corporate Transformation, Income Inequality, and Consumer Commodity Choice: The Economic Cycle in the Rise and Fall of Industries The U.S. Sanitary Pads Market: A Competitive Profile The Economic Implications of China’s Demographic Problems Social Spending and Long-term Economic Performance in the US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1