J. Marks, Donald V. Belsito, V. Deleo, J. Fowler, Anthony F. Franswa, H. Maibach, C. Mathias, M. Pratt, R. Rietschel, E. F. Sherertz, F. Storrs, James S. Taylor
{"title":"North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.","authors":"J. Marks, Donald V. Belsito, V. Deleo, J. Fowler, Anthony F. Franswa, H. Maibach, C. Mathias, M. Pratt, R. Rietschel, E. F. Sherertz, F. Storrs, James S. Taylor","doi":"10.1097/01206501-200306000-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPatch testing is the most worthwhile diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThis study reports patch-testing results from July 1, 1998, to December 31, 2000, by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients were tested with the same screening series of allergens, using a standardized patch-testing technique. The data from these patients were recorded on a standard computer entry form and analyzed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifty allergens were tested on over 5,800 patients. Amidoamine, benzophenone-3, and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate were the new allergens. The top 10 allergens in frequency of positive reactions were identical to those of our 1996-to 1998-study period. The incidence of allergic nickel reactions continues to go up, leading all the test substances by 16.2%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur findings reinforce the need for a more comprehensive group of diagnostic allergens than is found in the T.R.U.E. TEST, which is sold in the United States.","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"59-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01206501-200306000-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Patch testing is the most worthwhile diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis.
OBJECTIVE
This study reports patch-testing results from July 1, 1998, to December 31, 2000, by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.
METHODS
Patients were tested with the same screening series of allergens, using a standardized patch-testing technique. The data from these patients were recorded on a standard computer entry form and analyzed.
RESULTS
Fifty allergens were tested on over 5,800 patients. Amidoamine, benzophenone-3, and iodopropynyl butylcarbamate were the new allergens. The top 10 allergens in frequency of positive reactions were identical to those of our 1996-to 1998-study period. The incidence of allergic nickel reactions continues to go up, leading all the test substances by 16.2%.
CONCLUSION
Our findings reinforce the need for a more comprehensive group of diagnostic allergens than is found in the T.R.U.E. TEST, which is sold in the United States.