Parental Rights and the Temporality of Attachment: Law, Kinship, and Child Welfare in Japan

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Positions-Asia Critique Pub Date : 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1215/10679847-8978308
Kathryn E. Goldfarb
{"title":"Parental Rights and the Temporality of Attachment: Law, Kinship, and Child Welfare in Japan","authors":"Kathryn E. Goldfarb","doi":"10.1215/10679847-8978308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article explores the legal norms and regulatory mechanisms in Japan that structure child welfare placement decisions, focusing specifically on the legal category of “parental rights.” It is suggested that the ways child welfare officers and caregivers understand the concept of “rights” — both those of the biological parent(s) and the child — construe kinship relationships as problems to be managed, but with a particular orientation toward what is called in the article the temporality of attachment. Child welfare caseworkers’ understandings of legal categories, processes, and forms of documentation (such as the Japanese family registry) produce particular forms of kinship that prioritize a child’s possible future relationship with an absent parent, above and beyond the day-to- day relationships children might develop with alternative caregivers such as foster parents. Despite the fact that the author’s Japanese interlocutors often described kinship as an immutable relationship of blood ties, the author shows how kinship is in fact produced through specific encounters between (mostly absent) parents and their children, child welfare caseworkers, and foster and institutional caregivers, scaffolded by their engagement with legal and bureaucratic regimes. The article explores what parenthood means within Japanese child welfare, both as a temporalized form of relationality and as a set of legally structured claims to the right to care.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"51 4 1","pages":"469 - 493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-8978308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article explores the legal norms and regulatory mechanisms in Japan that structure child welfare placement decisions, focusing specifically on the legal category of “parental rights.” It is suggested that the ways child welfare officers and caregivers understand the concept of “rights” — both those of the biological parent(s) and the child — construe kinship relationships as problems to be managed, but with a particular orientation toward what is called in the article the temporality of attachment. Child welfare caseworkers’ understandings of legal categories, processes, and forms of documentation (such as the Japanese family registry) produce particular forms of kinship that prioritize a child’s possible future relationship with an absent parent, above and beyond the day-to- day relationships children might develop with alternative caregivers such as foster parents. Despite the fact that the author’s Japanese interlocutors often described kinship as an immutable relationship of blood ties, the author shows how kinship is in fact produced through specific encounters between (mostly absent) parents and their children, child welfare caseworkers, and foster and institutional caregivers, scaffolded by their engagement with legal and bureaucratic regimes. The article explores what parenthood means within Japanese child welfare, both as a temporalized form of relationality and as a set of legally structured claims to the right to care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母权利与依恋的暂时性:日本的法律、亲属关系与儿童福利
摘要:本文探讨了日本构成儿童福利安置决策的法律规范和监管机制,重点关注“父母权利”的法律范畴。有人认为,儿童福利官员和照料者理解“权利”概念的方式——包括亲生父母和孩子的权利——将亲属关系解释为需要管理的问题,但特别倾向于文章中所谓的依恋的暂时性。儿童福利个案工作者对法律类别、程序和文件形式(如日本家庭登记)的理解产生了特殊形式的亲属关系,优先考虑儿童与不在父母的可能的未来关系,超越儿童可能与其他照顾者(如养父母)发展的日常关系。尽管作者的日本对话者经常将亲属关系描述为一种不可改变的血缘关系,但作者展示了亲属关系实际上是如何通过(主要是缺席的)父母与子女、儿童福利个案工作者、寄养和机构看护人之间的特定接触而产生的,这些接触是由他们与法律和官僚制度的接触构成的。这篇文章探讨了在日本儿童福利中,父母身份意味着什么,既是一种暂时的关系形式,也是一套对照顾权的法律结构要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Contributors Contributors Editor's Introduction: Aesthetics of the Uncanny Daizō Sakurai's Trans-Asian Tent Theater, Picun, and the Reenchantment of Urban Space How to Create a New Workers' Culture Together: An Interview with Wang Dezhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1